Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2005 DIGILAW 2845 (RAJ)
Prithvi Singh v. Bhagwana thr. LRs.
2005-10-27
M.S.KHAN
body2005
[kku] lnL;&;g fuxjkuh Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh vyoj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 21-9-2002 ds fo:) jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e 1955 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr izLrqr dh xbZ gSA ¼2½ izdj.k esa rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gSa fd oknh vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 ds }kjk ,d okn bLedjkj gd o nq:Lrh bUnzkt fo:) izfroknhx.k@vizkFkhZx.k la[;k 2 o 3 ijh{k.k U;k;ky; ds le{k isk fd;kA ftls ijh{k.k U;k;ky; us fnukad 9-6-2000 dks [kkfjt dj fn;kA bldh vihy jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh vyoj ds U;k;ky; esa isk dh xbZA nkSjkus vihy vizkFkhZ }kjk ,d izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr vknsk 6 fu;e 17 lifBr /kkjk 151 tkIrk nhokuh fnukad 26-8-2002 dks okn esa lakks/ku gsrq izLrqr fd;kA vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk mDr izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj fy;kA blls O;fFkr gksdj ;g fuxjkuh e.My ds le{k isk dh xbZ gSA ¼3½ mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA ¼4½ izkFkhZa ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd oknh vizkFkhZa la[;k 1 }kjk nkok o lakksf/kr izkFkZuk i= rF;ksa dks fNikrs gq;s izLrqr fd;s x;s gSaA ijh{k.k U;k;ky; }kjk vius fu.kZ; fnukad 9-6-2000 esa rF;ksa dks Li"V fd;k x;k gS fd oknh }kjk isk dh xbZ tekcUnh o [kljk fxjnkojh lEor 2012 ls Li"V gksrk gS fd lkfcd [kljk uEcj 522 dk dqy jdck 3 ch?kk 7 fcLok gSA feyku {ks=Qy dh udy eqrkfcd ;g jdck gky [kljk uEcj 1091 jdck feu 2 fcLok 1092 esa 12 fcLok 1093 esa 1 ch?kk 6 fcLok o 1094 esa 1 ch?kk 7 fcLok kkfey fd;k x;k gS ijUrq ;gkW ,d vuqRrfjr izu NksM+ fn;k x;k gS fd ;g 8 fcLok jdck fdl gky [kljk uEcj esa ls de fd;k tkuk gSA oknh us u gh ;g crk;k fd ;g jdck fdl [kljk uEcj ls feyk gqvk gS o u gh mlds orZeku [kkrsnkj dks i{kdkj cuk;k x;k gS ,slh fLFkfr esa oknh vizkFkhZa }kjk fcuk fdlh lk{; o nLrkosth lcwr ds vk/kkj ij lh/kk gh lakks/ku izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj fn;k x;k fd 8 fcLok jdck [kljk ua- 1092 esa kkfey fd;k x;k gSA jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us fcuk fdlh lk{; lcwr ds mDr lakks/ku izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj fy;k tks dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ds loZFkk foijhr gSA ¼5½ vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dk fu.kZ; dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj lgh gSA jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us vizkFkhZ dk vknsk 6 fu;e 17 dk vkosnu vihy Lrj ij fu;ekuqlkj lgh Lohdkj fd;k gSA mudk dFku gS fd vizkFkhZa }kjk vknsk 6 fu;e 17 ds vkosnu esa okn esa lakks/ku ds tks dkj.k crk;s gSa mudks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s gh jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us gekjk vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k FkkA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd mijksDr lakks/ku ls okn dh iz—fr ij dksbZ ifjorZu ugha vkrk gS blesa dksbZ vfrfjDr kgknr lcwr dh vko;drk ugha gksxhA vius dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkj vkj Mh 1987 ist 103] vkjvkjVh 2002 ist 875 o 1075] vkj vkj Mh 2002 ist 470] vkj vkj Mh 1993 ist 160 o 520] vkj vkj Mh 1994 ist 547] vkj vkj Mh 2003 ist 331 o vkj vkj Vh 2002 ist 129 dh uthjsa isk dhA mUgksaus ;g Hkh dFku fd;k fd vizkFkhZ vuqlwfpr tkfr dk O;fDr gS tcfd fooknxzLr Hkwfe lkekU; tkfr ds O;fDr ds uke dj nh xbZ gS tks fd dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ds foijhr gSA ¼6½ geusa mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA ¼7½ Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us vius fu.kZ; fnukad 21-9-2002 esa ;g fu"d"kZ fudkyk gS fd bl lakks/ku ls nkosa dh uksb;r ugha cny jgh gSA blfy;s izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS izkFkhZ vihykFkhZx.k lakksf/kr nkok isk djsaA ge jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds mijksDr fu"d"kZ ls lger gSA D;ksafd vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vknsk 6 fu;e 17 tk-nh- ds vkosnu esa okn esa lakks/ku ds tks dkj.k crk;s x;s gS og U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrs gSA bl lEcU/k esa vkjvkjMh 1987 ist 103 ¼lqijk½] esa jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g O;oLFkk nh xbZ gS fd& Civil P.C., O.6.
R.17—Amendment of plaint—Ptff. seeking permission to amend plaint so as to include subsequent event giving rise to further cause of action—Decision of dispute being sought on basis of same title, which he had claimed initially in plaint—Held, it is appropriate and opposite that all such disputes between parties be decided in same suit—Appln. for amendment allowed. vkj-vkj-Mh- 2003 ist 331 ¼lqijk½] esa ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd& Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955, Secs, 183, 188, 212, 209—Code of Civil procedure, 1908 Order 6 Rule 17—Application under O.6, R.17—Application under O.6, R.17 CPC claiming an alternative relief that defendants be ejected u/s 183 of Act of 1955 allowed by Board of Revenue in revision peititon—Order allowing application challenged by writ petition—Dismissal of—Appeal against—Held, amendment of pleadings seeking an alternative relief is permissible at any stage—Amendment sought should neither take away that right accrued in favour of a party nor should change cause of action—Delay in seeking amendment, not fatal unless other sides cause gets prejudiced. blh izdkj vkj vkj Vh 2002 ist 129 ¼lqijk½] ij jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us iqu% ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955—Sec. 209 is meant for grant of relief without there being any formal amendment in the plaint and to prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. ¼8½ vr% mijksDr of.kZr leLr rF;ksa ,oa U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s ;g fuxjkuh [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh vyoj dk fu.kZ; fnukad 21-9-2002 ;Fkkor j[kk tkrk gSA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA[ 2005 DIGILAW 2845 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]