Research › Search › Judgment

Punjab High Court · body

2005 DIGILAW 315 (PNJ)

Harbansh v. State Of Haryana

2005-02-28

KIRAN ANAND LALL

body2005
Judgment Kiran Anand Lall, J. 1. It is not disputed that quantity of Smack alleged to have been recovered from the possession of petitioner does not fall with the category of commercial quantity. 2. Petitioner is in judicial custody and challan has also been filed in Court. 3. Bail allowed to the petitioner to the satisfaction of concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate.