Judgment 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal is directed against the Judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 03.05.1999 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 348/1999. 3. Learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant against the termination of his services by holding that the petitioner has alternative remedy under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, he should persue that remedy. 4. The petitioner appellant was serving as Chowkidar in the Government Boys Hostel, Bhukhredi, district Churu. His services were terminated vide order dated nil Annexure-2 which reads when translated that "his services are terminated with immediate effect in pursuance of the directions issued by the Additional Director, Social Welfare Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur, vide his letter No. 75397-447 dated 212.1998." 5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner points out that the Government order dated 212.1998 referred to in the order of termination itself has been quashed by this Court in Dayalal & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., 2003 (3) RLR page 226, and the termination order passed in pursuance thereof was quashed. The said decision was rendered on 07.05.2003 and Judgment was affirmed in D.B. Special Appeal No. 454/2004, State vs. Dayalal, against the Judgment rendered in S.B. Civil Writ No. 619/1999. 6. Learned Counsel further informs that though SLP in aforesaid Judgment has been granted but no interim relief was granted in respect of setting aside the termination order. However, by way of interim relief regularisation of such employees, whose termination of services have been set aside have been stayed. 7. This position has not been disputed by the learned Additional Advocate General. 8. In view of the aforesaid decision, it is apparent that very foundation of the order of termination cases to exist, therefore, termination order cannot be sustained. Accordingly, question of availability of alternative remedy becomes of academic importance. 9. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the Judgment under appeal is set aside and the writ petition is allowed. The impugned order terminating the services of the petitioner is quashed. Since, regularisation of such employees have been stayed by Supreme Court, the appellants case may also be considered in the light of Supreme Courts order, that may be passed in pending appeal. The petitioner shall be reinstated in service forthwith.