JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned Counsel for the parties.The injured appellant has filed this appeal for enhancement of the amount of compensation against the judgment/award 12.1.1998 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Motor Accident Claims Case No. 289/1994, whereby the learned Tribunal awarded total compensation of Rs. 58,840 in favour of the claimant appellant. 2. Learned Counsel for the claimant appellant contended that looking to the head injury of the injured and further that he was operated, the amount of Rs. 15,000 as compensation for 10% permanent disability is a meagre amount and the same be enhanced. 3. Learned Counsel for the respondents contended that the amount of compensation awarded in the present case is just and reasonable and no case for interference in the impugned award is made out. 4. I have considered the rival submissions and examined the impugned judgment passed by the Tribunal. 5. Learned Tribunal while discausesing Issue No. 4 has considered that as per the injury report Ex. 1, there is only one injury and as per the x-ray report Ex. 8 the said injury was found on head of the injured. Ex. 11 is the permanent disability certificate, which has been proved by Dr. M.K. Mathur, A.W. 5. The injured was hospitalized for six days and could not attend his duty during the period from 24.2.1994 to 30.3.1994. Learned Tribunal has awarded Rs. 15,000 for 10% permanent disability, Rs. 3,840 for 35 days leave as per his monthly salary of Rs. 3,290, Rs. 25,000 for "physical and mental agony", Rs. 5,000 for transportation etc., and Rs. 10,000 has further been awarded for permanent disfiguration. Thus, total amount of Rs. 58,840 has been awarded in favour of the injured appellant. 6. Learned Tribunal has awarded compensation on each and every count and in my view the total amount of compensation appears to be just and reasonable in the facts and circumstances of the present case. 7. I do not find any merit in this appeal and the same is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.Appeal dismissed. *******