ORDER R.B. Misra, J. 1. Heard Mr. N. Sailo, learned Counsel for the Appellants. 2. The Letters Patent appeal (in short L.P.A.) has been preferred against judgment and order dated 23/2/2005 passed by Single Judge of this High Court in RSA No. 4/04 (i.e. Smt. Chalthiangi v. State of Mizoram and Ors.) allowing the regular second appeal above mentioned preferred by Plaintiff/Opp. Party herein. 3. The Rule 2 of Chapter V-A of Gauhati High Court Rules provides as below: 2. An appeal from the judgment and order of a single Judge disposing of an application shall lie to the Division Bench if preferred within thirty days of the date of such judgment and order. The Division Bench may condone the delay in filing any appeal, if good and sufficient cause is shown. 4. The above rules deals with a provision of appeal namely writ appeal only against the judgment and order of a Single Judge preferred within 30(thirty) days, however, there is no provision of preferring an appeal against an order of a Single Judge of this Court disposing of regular second appeal. 5. The Code of Civil Procedure (amendment) Act, 2002 (applicable with effect from 1.7.2002) provides as below: 4. Substitution of new Section for Section 100A. For Section 100A of the principal Act as substituted by Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (amendment) Act, 1999 (46 of 1999), the following Section shall be substituted, namely: 100A. No further appeal in certain cases: Notwithstanding anything contained in any letters patent for any High Court or in any instrument having the force of law or in any other law for the time being in force, where any appeal from an original or appellate decree or order is heard and decided by a Single Judge of a High Court no further appeal shall lie from the judgment and decree of such Single Judge. 6. In view of the non-availability of any provision provided in High Court Rules for entertaining an appeal against the order of a Single Judge passed in Regular Second appeal and in view of the amendment brought in the Code of Civil Procedure above mentioned, this L.P.A. is not maintainable. 7. Any particular or specific relief by way of appeal could only be sought under an 'Act' or 'Code' provided the appropriate provision is specifically available in the 'Act' or 'Code' for such legal remedy. 8. 7. Any particular or specific relief by way of appeal could only be sought under an 'Act' or 'Code' provided the appropriate provision is specifically available in the 'Act' or 'Code' for such legal remedy. 8. Accordingly, in view of the above observations this Letters Patent Appeal (L.P.A.) is dismissed as not maintainable. Appeal dismissed.