[kku] lnL;& ;g fuxjkuh jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh izkf/kdkjh t;iqj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 26-12-01 ds fo:} jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; lgk;d dysDVj kkgiqjk ds U;k;ky; esa fu;fer okn fopkjk/khu gSA nkSjkus okn izkFkhZ us fooknxzLr Hkwfe ij fjlhoj fu;qDr fd;s tkus gsrq ,d izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;kA ijh{k.k U;k;ky; us nksuksa i{kdkjksa dks lqudj vius fu.kZ; fnukad 20-4-98 ds }kjk fooknxzLr vkjkth ij rglhynkj kkgiqjk dks fjlhoj fu;qDr dj fn;k blls O;fFkr gksdj vizkFkhZ us jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh t;iqj ds U;k;ky; esa viuhnk;j dh ftUgksus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 26-12-2001 ds }kjk vihy Lohdkj dj ijh{k.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; fnukad 20-4-98 dks fujLr dj fn;kA blls O;fFkr gksdj ;g fuxjkuh e.My ds le{k izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 3- mHk; i{k d fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA 4- izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh t;iqj us dsoy blh fcUnq ij izkFkhZ dh vihy [kkfjt dj nh fd ewy nkok [kkfjt gks tkus ls vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 212 ds izdj.k esa fjlhoj fu;qDr djus ds vknsk Hkh Lor% gh izHkkoghu gks tkrs gS ftls ijh{k.k U;k;ky; esa iqu% izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djds gh iqu% vknsk izkIr dj cgky djk;k tk ldrk gSA mUgksus dFku fd;k fd jktLo izkf/kdkjh us vkjvkjlh 1993 ist 112 ds fu.kZ; dks vk/kkj cuk;k gS tcfd bl lEcU/k esa jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk MCyw,ylh 1992 oks&2 ist 223 ij tks fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gS mlds ifjizs{; esa jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh dk mDr fu.kZ; loZFkk xSj dkuwuh gSA vius i{k ds leFkZu esa vkjvkjMh 2001 ist 111 dh uthj isk dhA mUgksus dFku fd;k fd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds vihy eSfjVl ij fuf.kZr djuh pkfg;s FkhA 5- vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds U;k;ky; esa nksuksa i{kdkjksa us ekuk gS fd ewy nkok [kkfjt gks x;k gSA izkFkhZ us jktlo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds U;k;ky; esa bl rF; ls badkj Hkh ugh fd;k gS fd ewy nkok [kkfjt ugh gqvk gS cfYd izkFkhZ }kjk ;g dgk x;k gS fd ewy nkok iqu% uEcj ij ys fy;k x;k gS tSlk fd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds fu.kZ; ds iSjk 2 ls Li"V gSA mUgksus dFku fd;k fd izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd }kjk jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; dh ftl uthj dk gokyk fn;k gS og bl izdj.k ds foks"k rF;ksa ds ifjizs{; esa ykxw ugh gksrh gSA ;g vknsk 39 :y 1 lhihlh ds lEcU/k esa flfoy okn ds laca/k esa ikfjr fd;k x;k fu.kZ; gS tcfd fopkjk/khu izdj.k vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 213 ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr gSA 6- mi jktdh; vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd }kjk fn;s x;s rdksZ dk leFkZu fd;k rFkk ;g fuxjkuh [kkfjt djus dh izkFkZuk dhA 7- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa i=koyh [kkfjt djus dh izkFkZuk dhA 8- fopkjk/khu izdj.k esa vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 212 ds izdj.k esa ewyHkwr fopkj.kh; fcUnq dkuwuh gSA jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us vius fu.kZ; esa izkFkhZ }kjk muds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr vihy dsoy bl dkuwuh fcUnq ij [kkfjt dh gS fd ;fn ijh{k.k U;k;ky; esa ewy nkok [kkfjt gks tkrk gS rks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 212 ds izdj.k esa fjlhoj fu;qDr djus laca/kh ;k vU; tks Hkh vknsk ikfjr fd;k tkrk gS kog vknsk Hkh Lor% gh izHkkoghu gks tkrk gS ftls fd iqu% izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djds gh U;k;ky; dk iqu% vknsk izkIr dj jsLVkssj djk;k tk ldrk gSA jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us viuk fu.kZ; vkjvkjlh 1993 ist 112 dks vk/kkj cukdj ikfjr fd;k gSA geus vkjvkjlh 199 ist 112 dh :fyax dk voyksdu fd;kA bl fu.kZ; esa mijksDr fopkjk/khu fo"k; laca/kh dksbZ fu.kZ; gh ugh gSA ;g :fyax rks vU; dkuwuh fcUnq ds laca/k ugh gSA ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us fcuk :fyax dk voyksdu fd;s gh ml ij viuk fu.kZ; vk/kkfjr dj fn;k gSA tcfd izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk dFku gS fd bl laca/k esa MCY;w,ylh 1992 oks&2 ist 223 ij ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ds ifjizs{; esa jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh dk mDr vknsk lgh ugh gSA mDr uthj esa ;g O;oLFkk nh xbZ gS fd & Civil Procedure Code - Order 9 R. 9, Order 39 R. 1 2 - Effect of defaulted dismissal of suit on temporary injunction - Temporary injunction abates along with dismissal of suit but is restored automatically along with restoration of suit unless the temporary injunction is revoked by separate speaking order in which case fresh application for temporary injunction would be needed. 9- orZeku fopkjk/khu izdj.k esa Hkh ijh{k.k U;k;ky; esa ewy nkok vne gktjh esa [kkfjt gqvk Fkk fdUrq vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 212 ds izdj.k ftlesa fd fjlhoj fu;qDr Fkk ,oa ftldh vihy jktLo izkf/kdkjh ds ;gkWa fopkjk/khu Fkh] esa ijh{k.k U;k;ky; esa fjlhoj fu;qfDr laca/kh izdj.k esa i`Fkd ls dksbZ vknsk gh ikfjr ugh fd;k FkkA blh izdkj vjvkjMh 2001 ist 111 ij Hkh ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vfHker O;Dr fd;k x;k gS fd & 11. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record the order passed by the Assistant Collector on 4.6.74 appointing the receiver during the pendency of these proceedings. The order unmistakably directs that receiver is appointed until further orders. His appointment was not confined until pronouncements of the order of the Assistant Collector in the proceedings before it. Therefore applying the aforesaid principle it must be held that appointment of receiver continued until he was discharged from his office by a subsequent order or suit between the parties stood finally determined. After which he could not act as receiver, though he may be responsible and answerable to the Court for that count for his actions. Viewed in that light the revision arising out of these proceedings was in continuation of the suit and passing an order by the Trial Court by itself does not attain finality, if challenged and the orders are passed by the superior Courts exercising such powers. In the present case the appeal filed by the `petitione before the Revenue Appellate Authority against the order dt. 2.9.75 was continuation of the same proceedings which were pending before the Assistant Collector and being unsuccessful his revision before the Board of Revenue would also be treated as continuation of the same proceeding. As the Board of Revenue did not decide the controversy finally, but remanded the case back to the original authority for making fresh orders after impleading Ramu Ram as a party. The lis continued to exist. The operation of appointment of receiver which was to be effective until further orders continue to operate throughout until discharged. The fact that during the subsequent stages of the proceeding the land remained in possession of the petitioner would not affect this position. 12. It may further be further be viewed from another perspective. It is not in dispute between the parties that order dt. The fact that during the subsequent stages of the proceeding the land remained in possession of the petitioner would not affect this position. 12. It may further be further be viewed from another perspective. It is not in dispute between the parties that order dt. 4.9.74 continued to operate until 2.7.75 that is to say the receiver came in possesion of the property under the order dt. 4.6.74 on passing of the order dt. 2.9.75 the possession of the Tehsildar as a receiver became possession of State under its own right which continued to be so until order passed by the Board of Revenue dt. 14.2.83 setting aside the two orders and remanding the case back to the original authority. In that even at best the petitioner would have been entitled to claim restitution. Before restoring the possession question would still be for the Trial Courts to consider whether the possession may be delivered to him or possession should be handed over to the receiver which has not been discharged by the Court. 13. Thus viewed from any angle the order passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority affirming the order of the SDO does not suffer from any apparent error which may require interference by this Court. 14. In this connection reference is made to decision of this Court in (2) Kanchand Bail vs. Ketsidas & Ors. AIR 1991 Rajasthan 94. In that case it has been held that on the setting aside of the order of rejection of the plaint and its remand by the appellate Court, the temporary injunction issued by the Trial Court does not automatically stand revived. The interlocutory order viz., striking out defence which are meant to aid and supplement the ultimate decision arrived at in the main suit or appeal would be ancillary order and such order would stand revived automatically on the restoration of the suit. Therefore keeping in view that principle, the Court held that temporary injunction granted by the Trial Court come to an end when the proceedings before the Trial Court end and temporary injunction does not survive. That principle in my opinion cannot be imported while considering the question of appointment and duration of office of receiver. This question invariably is linked with the order of appointment. That principle in my opinion cannot be imported while considering the question of appointment and duration of office of receiver. This question invariably is linked with the order of appointment. mijksDr n`"Vkar esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; dh ghjk yky ikVuh cuke ywudj.k lsfB;k ,oa vU; ds dsl esa nh xbZ :fyax dks Hkh dksV djrs gq;s ;g fu"d"kZ fudkyk gS fd & 9. I have given my careful consideration to the rival contentions. The duration for which a receiver is appointed in a given case has not been provided specifically under any provision. However the question is not res integra and it stands settled by a decision of the Supreme Court in Hiralal Patni vs. Loonkaran Sethiya & Ors. AIR 1962 SC P. 21. Where in the Court stated the law about the duration of appointment as receiver, in the following words: "The law may briefly be stated thus if a receiver is appointed in a suit until judgment, the appointment is brought to an end by the judgment in the act on. If a receiver is appointed in a suit, without is tenure being expressly defined, he will continue to be receiver till he is discharge. But after the final disposal of the suit as between the parties to the litigation, the receiver functions are terminated, he would still be answerable to the Court as its officer has ample power to continue receiver even after the final decree. bl dkuwuh fcUnq ij jktLo e.My dk vkjvkjMh 1994 ist 736 esa izdkfkr fu.kZ; gh miyC/k gS ftlesa dgk x;k gS fd & Rajasthan Tenancy Act - Section 212 - Code of Civil Procedure, Order 9 R.8 -Temporary injunctions and orders of appointment of receiver are automatically vacated when the suit is dismissed in default and on restoration of the suit, they are not revived. 10- jktLo e.My dh ,dy ihB esa ekuuh; lnL; Jh vks-ih- tSu }kjk mijksDr fu.kZ; tks fu"d"kZ fudkyk x;k gS mlls MCY;w,ylh 1992 ist 223 vkjvkjMh 2001 ist 111 rFkk ghjk yky ikVuh cuke yw.kdj.k o vU; ,vkbZvkj 1962 ,llh ist 21 fn;s x;s fu.kZ;ksa ds ifjizs{; esa ge lger ugh gSA 11- mijksDr of.kZr leLr rF;ksa] dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ,oa U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa j[krs gq, ;g fuxjkuh Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh t;iqj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 26-12-01 dks fujLr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa mUgs funsZk fn;s tkrs gS fd og bl fuxjkuh dk fu.kZ; nksuksa i{kksa dks lqudj eSfjVl ij ikfjr djsaA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA