Judgment Prakash Tatia, J.-Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner was granted authorisation for running a fair price shop vide order dated 14.06.2000. When complaints were found against the petitioner, a notice was issued to the petitioner to show-cause and after detailed enquiry, a report was submitted holding petitioner guilty. The matter was considered by the Competent Authority and thereafter by the District Collector, Dungerpur in appeal. The District Collector recorded all the facts in its order dated 10.07.2002 and also found that the appellant himself admitted that he was not resident of the Panchayat. All the facts again considered by the Food Commissioner in its order dated 22.08.2003 in detail. 3. According to learned Counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was not given full opportunity to contest the matter. 4. In the light of the facts mentioned in the impugned order, it is clear that petitioner was given full opportunity to contest the allegations levelled against the petitioner. 5. Therefore, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed.