Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Asit Kumar Bisi ( 1 ) THIS appeal is at the instance of a husband in proceedings under section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act and is directed against Order No. 2, dated June 15, 2005 passed by the learned District Judge, Howrah thereby passing an ad interim order of injunction in connection with the said proceedings for permanent alimony. ( 2 ) IN our view, an order of ad interim order of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure passed in proceedings under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act is not appealable under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) of the Code. ( 3 ) IT appears from the provisions of Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage act that only final decree passed in the proceedings and final order under sections 25 and 26 of the Act are appealable and no other orders are appealable under the provisions of the said Act. ( 4 ) MR. Basu, learned Advocate for the appellant tried to convince us that as by virtue of Section 21 of the Act the Code of Civil Procedure is applicable, therefore, even an order passed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 is appealable under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) of the Code. ( 5 ) WE are afraid we are not at all impressed by such submission. By section 21 of the Act, only the procedural part of the Code of Civil procedure is made applicable to the proceedings under Hindu Marriage act, but there being specific provision for appeal contained in the Act itself in Section 28, we cannot conceive of any appeal except those provided under Section 28 of the Act. ( 6 ) THUS, the order impugned is not appealable and the appeal is dismissed on that ground alone. ( 7 ) WE make it clear that we have not gone into the merit. ( 8 ) THE learned Advocate for the appellant is at liberty to take back the certified copy of the order impugned from the Court itself. Let xerox certified copy of this order be given to the parties within one week from the date of making of such application.