Judgment 1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and perused the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition. The appellant was engaged as a Class IV employee on daily wages by the respondent Bank in the year, 1994. His services were terminated by order dated 26th May, 1997. On Industrial dispute being raised, reference was made to the Labour Court, Jodhpur. The Labour Court found that the appellant was engaged for cleaning the bank building. He was initially paid Rs. 10/-per day and later on Rs. 40/-per day. His appointment was also found to be not by a regular process of selection against a permanent post. However, the Tribunal found the order of termination bad in view of the violation of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Tribunal in lieu of reinstatement directed to pay compensation in the sum of Rs. 20,000/-. The appellant aggrieved of the part of the order filed a petition before this Court. The learned Single Judge after examining the issue in depth and detail and taking guidance from the parameters laid down by the various decisions of the Apex Court and this Court found that the Tribunal was right in directing payment of compensation in lieu of reinstatement. 2. Having perused the Judgment of the learned Single Judge, we are of the view that the learned Single Judge after testing the case on the para meters laid down by this Court and the Apex Court has rightly refused to interfere with the order of the Tribunal directing payment of compensation in lieu of reinstatement. No interference is warranted with the order of the learned Single Judge. The special appeal stands dismissed.