ORDER 1. The statement made by this Court on 15-3-2005t had been that "it had been indirectly enquired whether the High Court could transfer the Special Judge trying the case and the reply had been that the High Court could do what it wants and we would do what we think necessary". Counsel had then interjected that pressures were being brought on Judges. Because of the large-scale coverage by the media and the consequent controversy it has become necessary for this Court to clarify that it was not mentioned or implied by me that pressure had been brought on me to have the Special Judge changed. There has been no such pressure. It is to be clarified that no one from the High Court or on behalf of the High Court had enquired of me. The person concerned has since clarified to me that the enquiry was just an academic inquiry. I am satisfied that the explanation is correct and my original inference that there was an attempt to influence me was wrong. Hence this clarification to clear up the misunderstanding which has arisen. 2. Let this clarification be a part of the record. 3. List on 12-4-2005. Court Masters