Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2005 DIGILAW 694 (RAJ)

Vishnu Dutt Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

2005-03-01

R.P.VYAS

body2005
Judgment R.P. Vyas, J.-The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction against the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Physical Training Instructor Grade III after granting him 10 bonus marks for the sports certificate (Annexure-4). 2. The brief facts of the case are that an advertisement was issued by the respondents on 28.07.2003 inviting applications for the post of Physical Training Instructor Grade III. The petitioner being eligible for appointment on the post of PTI Grade III, applied for the same. The last date of submission of the application form was 13.08.2003. 3. It has further been averred by the petitioner in the writ petition that he participated in Inter-College Kho-Kho tournament conducted by the Maharishi Dayanand Saraswati University, Ajmer. 4. Further case of the petitioner is that he submitted the said certificate alongwith the application form. A provisional merit list was prepared by the respondents and the candidates were called for the interview. The interviews were held on 03.09.2003. 5. The controversy involved in the present writ petition is that the sports certificate (Annexure-4) submitted by the petitioner alongwith the application form was equivalent to State Level Certificate, but the respondents have not awarded 10 bonus marks for the same. Hence, this writ petition. 6. A reply to the writ petition was filed by the respondents and their stand in the reply is that the sports certificate (Annexure-4) submitted by the petitioner is not of State level, and hence, he has rightly not been awarded 10 bonus marks for the same. It has also been contended by the respondents in the reply that since the name of the petitioner did not figure in the merit list, he was not called for the interview. 7. In the instant petition, the main contention of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the Inter-College certificate is a State Level Certificate and thus, he is entitled to get 10 bonus marks for the same. It has also been argued on behalf of the petitioner that this Court in the case of State of Rajasthan vs. Umesh Jangid D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 261/1997 decided on 04.08.1997 has held that Inter-College tournament certificates are State Level Certificate. It has also been argued on behalf of the petitioner that this Court in the case of State of Rajasthan vs. Umesh Jangid D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 261/1997 decided on 04.08.1997 has held that Inter-College tournament certificates are State Level Certificate. Thus, when it has been held by this Court that Inter-College tournament Certificate is State Level Certificate, he is entitled to get 10 bonus marks for the same and he could not be denied the benefit of said certificate. 8. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 9. During the course of arguments, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the instant case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Raees Ahmed Qureshi vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., S.B. CWP No. 5300/2003 decided on 1.2005 and the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Umesh Jangird (Supra). 10. Since, the controversy involved in the instant petition is squarely, covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Raees Ahmed Qureshi and Umesh Jangird (Supra) and this fact has not been controverted by the learned Counsel for the respondents, therefore, the present writ petition deserves to be allowed in terms of the observations made in the case of Raees Ahmed Qureshi (Supra) and it is held that the petitioner is entitled to get 10 bonus marks on the basis of Certificate (Annexure-4). 11. Accordingly, in view of the observations made by this Court in the case of Raees Ahmed Qureshi (Supra), the instant petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to consider the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Physical Training Instructor Grade III after granting 10 bonus on the basis of Certificate (Annexure 4) and in case after granting 10 bonus marks, if any person who stood lower in merit than the petitioner, has been offered appointment, then the case of the petitioner be also considered for appointment form the date the person less meritorious to him has been given appointment. On his appointment, the petitioner shall not be entitled for the emoluments of the post for the past, however, he will be entitled to claim seniority over the persons who were lower in merit, but have been offered appointment prior to him. 12. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the instant petition is allowed. On his appointment, the petitioner shall not be entitled for the emoluments of the post for the past, however, he will be entitled to claim seniority over the persons who were lower in merit, but have been offered appointment prior to him. 12. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the instant petition is allowed. There will be no order as to costs.