JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material/record of the case made available to me during arguments of the case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in respect of the disputed house, earlier one FIR No.6/2002 was registered on 9.1.2002. Subsequently, the accused petitioner filed a Civil Suit for permanent injunction on 15.2.2002 and they gave reference to so called agreement dated 3.1.91 in para 2 of the Civil suit. Copy of the civil suit was served on defendant who is complainant in the present case. The complainant came to know about the said agreement, but no immediate FIR was registered. The written statement was filed in 2003, which clearly shows that it was in the knowledge of the complainant that an agreement was executed on 3.1.91. The so called agreement is a subject matter of civil suit also the Civil Court is competent to decide the question on the basis of evidence, as to whether the said agreement is forged or not. There is no explanation as to why the present FIR was lodged after so much delay. This case appears to be a case of harassment to the petitioner. 3. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I am inclined to allow the bail application of the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 4. Therefore, the SHO I.O. of Police Station Patan Disk Sikar is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Leela Ram in FIR No.106/2004 registered under Sections 420, 467, 120-B & 379 Indian Penal Code he shall enlarge him on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions : (i) He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii) He shall not directly (or indirectly) make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii) He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. *******