Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2005 DIGILAW 866 (RAJ)
Rajasthan Housing Board v. Bhanwari
2005-03-18
A.K.PUROHIT, R.N.ARVIND
body2005
iqjksfgr] lnL;&;g vihy /kkjk 224 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e ¼la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e*½ ds vUrxZr jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] chdkusj ds fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 17-3-98 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds laf{kIr esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd lgk;d ftyk/khk] eq[;ky; chdkusj ds ;gka jktLo okn bl vkk; dk isk gqvk fd xzke pdoxhZ rglhy chdkusj ds iqjkus [kljk uEcj 813@365 jdck 6-7 ch?kk ,oa [kljk uEcj 10441@365@59 jdck 12-10 ch?kk dqy 18-17 ch?kk gky [kljk uEcj 782 jdck 2-2 ch?k [kljk uEcj 766 jdck 9 ch?kk dqy 11-2 ch?kk fookfnr vkjkth oknh la[;k 1@1 eq- Hkaojh csok eksguyky ds olqj] oknh uEcj 1@2 eq- lqkhyk iq=h eksguyky ds nknk o oknh uEcj 2 o 3 kadjyky] dkukjke ds firk chatkjke ds dCts dkr jktLo fjdkMZ esa FkhA jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e izHkko esa vkus ds le; oknhx.k /kkjk 15 ^vf/kfu;e* ds vuqlkj Lor% gh [kkrsnkj gks tkrs gSA jktLFkku ugj ifj;kstuk {ks= esa vkus ls oknhx.k dks [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj 15&, jktLFkku fVuSUlh ,DV ds rgr iznRRk ugha fd;s x;s rFkk izfroknhx.k la[;k 2 ,oa 3] uxj fodkl U;k;ky; chdkusj o jktLFkku gkÅflax cksMZ mDr vkjkth ij edku fuekZ.k djus dh fQjkd esa gS] blfy, mDr fookfnr vkjkth dk mudks [kkrsnkj ?kksf"kr fd;k tkos ,oa blh vuqlkj jktLo fjdkMZ esa nq:Lrh dh tkos ,oa izfroknhx.k ds fo:) LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk tkjh dh tkosA izfroknh uEcj 1 ¼uxj fodkl U;kl½ us fnukad 26-10-93 dks tokc izLrqr dj okn ds rF;ksa dks udkjrs gq, /kkjk 98 uxj fodkl U;kl ,DV ds vuq:i nks ekg ds uksfVl ds vHkko esa okn [kkfjt djus dk fuosnu fd;kA fnukad 5-12-88 dks izfroknh uEcj 2 izfroknh uEcj 3 us tokc izLrqr dj jktLFkku gkmflax cksMZ ,DV dh /kkjk 50 ds rgr nks ekg dk uksfVl ugha nsus ds QyLo:i okn la/kkj.kh; ugha crk;k rFkk okn dh lquokbZ dks jktLo U;k;ky; ds {ks=kf/kdkj esa ugha gksuk Hkh dgkA okni= ,oa tokcnkos ds vk/kkj ij lkr rudh;kr dk;e dj okn ij fopkj.k dj lgk;d ftyk/khk us okn oknh ds i{k esa fnukad 10-11-97 dks fuf.kZr dj fMØh tkjh dh ftlds fo:) jktLFkku vkoklu e.My us jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] chdkusj ds le{k vihy izLrqr dh ftls mUgksaus vius fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 17-3-98 }kjk [kkfjt dj fn;k ftlds fo:) ;g f}rh; vihy izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 3- vihykaV gkmflax cksMZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk rdZ gS fd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; lhihlh ds vknsk 41 fu;e 31 ds izko/kkuksa ds foijhr gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd jktLFkku vkoklu ,DV dh /kkjk 50 ds rgr oknh us nks ekg dk lwpuk i= fn;s okn izLrqr fd;k gS tks pyrs ;ksX; ugha FkkA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd oknh us vius okn ds leFkZu esa tks nLrkostkr izLrqr fd;s gS] os lk{; esa xzg.k fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha Fks D;ksafd oknh us ewy nLrkost isk ugha djds lfVZQkbZM dksih dh QksVks dkWih isk dh rFkk bl okn esa bu nLrkost dks iznkZ Hkh ugha fd;k x;kA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd fookfnr Hkwfe dks vokIr dj gkmflax cksMZ dks nh xbZ gS] blfy, Hkwfe dh foØ; vkcknh esa ifjofrZr gks tkus ls jktLo U;k;ky; esa okn Jo.k ;ksX; ugha FkkA 4- uxj lq/kkj U;kl ds vf/koDrk us jktLFkku gkmflax cksMZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd ds rdksZ dk leFkZu fd;kA 5- fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd jsLiksMsaV dk dFku gS fd dsoy ek= rudhokj fu.kZ; ugha djus ls jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh dk fu.kZ; voS/k ugha gks tkrk gS D;ksafd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us izdj.k ds reke fookfnr fcUnqvksa ij fopkj dj mudk foospu djds viuk fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd /kkjk 50 ds uksfVl ds ckcr dksbZ rudh dk;e ugha dh xbZ blfy, f}rh; vihy esa bl fcUnq dks mBkus dk mudks dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd okn ds leFkZu esa izLrqr nLrkostksa ds ,XthfcV isk ugha djus ds mijkUr Hkh mu nLrkostksa dks okn ds fu.kZ; dk vk/kkj cuk;k tk ldrk gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd okn jktLo jsdkMZ ds vk/kkj ij fuf.kZr fd;k x;k gS blfy, Hkwfe dh fdLe ds ifjorZu dk muds okn ij dksbZ vlj ugha iM+rk D;ksafd ftl Hkwfe dks vokIr fd;k x;k og d`f"k Hkwfe FkhA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd jkT; ljdkj dh vksj ls /kkjk 80 ds rgr vkifRr;ka djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha gSA 6- geus mHk;i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdksa ds rdZ lqusA mu ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- fookfnr Hkwfe dks jkT; ljdkj }kjk vokIr dh tkdj Hkwfe jkT; ljdkj }kjk uxj lq/kkj U;kl dks lu~ 1976 ds uksfVfQdsku ds tfj;s lqiqnZ dj nh xbZ bldk [k.Mu u rks v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds le{k orZeku jsLiksMsaV us fd;k gS u gh bl U;k;ky; ds le{kA mDr Hkwfe jktLFkku vkoklu e.My dks vkoafVr dj nh xbZ ;g Hkh fookfnr ugha gSA jsLiksMsaV }kjk fookfnr Hkwfe ckcr dh xbZ vokfIr dh dk;Zokgh dks ijks{k :i ls bl ls bl okn esa pqukSrh nh gS vkSj fopkj.k U;k;ky; us bl laca/k esa rudh uEcj 6 ,oa 7 dk fu"d"kZ fudkyrs le; vokfIr dk;Zokgh dh oS/kkfudrk ij gh izu fpUg yxk fn;k rFkk vokIr dh xbZ Hkwfe dks jktLFkku gkmflax cksMZ dks fd;s x;s vkoUVu dh krksZ dk mYys[k djrs gq, bu rudh;kr dks oknh@jsLIkksMsaV ds i{k esa fuf.kZr fd;k gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk fudkyk x;k mDr fu"d"kZ voS/kkfud gS vkSj fof/k ds loZ ekU; fl)karksa ds izfrdwy gSA vokfIr dk;Zokgh dks pqukSrh nsus ,oa mldh vokfIr dk;Zokgh dh oS/kkfudrk dh tkap djus dk dk;Z jktLo U;k;ky;ksa dk drbZ ugha gSA fookfnr Hkwfe ds vkoUVu dj fy;s tkus vkSj mldks uxj lq/kkj U;kl dks lqiqZn dj fn;s tkus rFkk uxj lq/kkj U;kl }kjk Hkwfe dks jktLFkku gkmflax cksMZ dks vkoUVu dj fn;s tkus ds ipkr ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd fookfnr Hkwfe d`f"k Hkwfe jg xbZA mDr Hkwfe vjcu Hkwfe gh ekuh tkosxh vkSj vjcu Hkwfe ds ckcr jktLo U;k;ky; esa okn drbZ la/kkj.k ;ksX; ugha jgrkA bl lEcU/k esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk Smt. Kaushalya Devi vs. State of Rajasthan (1989 (2) RLW P. 380) ds iSjk uEcj 10 ij tks fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS] og fuEu izdkj gS%& ¼d½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku & vuqPNsn 226 & jktLFkku Hkwfe jktLo vf/kfu;e & /kkjk 92 rFkk 102&d & Hkwfe jktLo foHkkx dh lEifRr gS & /kkjk 92 jkT; ljdkj kfDr ls l{ke gS fd og utwy Hkwfe vFkok mlds fdlh Hkkx dks LFkkuh; izkf/kdj.k dks lkSi ldrh gS & jkT; ljdkj }kjk /kkjk 3¼1½ lifBr /kkjk 2¼1½ en la[;k ¼l½ lfgr ds vUrxZr ,d vf/klwpuk tkjh gqbZ & vc ;g Hkwfe uxjh; {ks= esa vk xbZ gS vkSj uxj lq/kkj U;kl ds dCts esa j[kh xbZ gSA ¼[k½ jktLFkku uxj lq/kkj U;kl] vf/kfu;e 1959 & /kkjk 2 rFkk 3 vkSj jktLFkku jktLo vf/kfu;e jktLo vf/kfu;e & /kkjk 102 & d jktLo ds v/khu xkao ds foks"k Hkkx dks uxjh; {ks= ?kksf"kr djuk & rc ml {ks= foks"k ij Hkwfe jktLo vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku egRoghu gks tkosaxsA 8- blh izdkj 1995 vkjvkjMh ist 325 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us tks fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS] og fuEu izdkj gS%& (A) Raj.
Land Revenue (Allotment, Conversion and Regularisation of Agricultural Land for Residential and Commercial Purposes in Urban Areas) Rules, 1981, Rules 11 & 13 - Held, no conversion charges for residential purpose to be imposed for land even if it was earlier agricultural but subsequently treated as ``Abadi (residential) land on the basis of entries in record of rights-Rules of 1981 not applicable to such land-Further held that Rr. 11 & 13 of 1981 Rules are ultra vires of Art. 14 of Constitution of India being arbitrary and discriminatory and, therefore, struck down-(Raj. Land Revenue Act, 1956) S.90A) - (Constn, Art,14) (B) Land Laws - Raj. Tenancy Act. Sec. 5(24) - Raj. Land Revenue Act. Sec. 103(b) - Land shown in record of rights as ``Gair Mumkin Abadi cannot be treated as agritultural aldn - Lands failing within populated area including lands reserved and set apart for development of populated area, irrespective of fact whether building has been raised or not, are deemed and considered to be ``Abadi Lands in contradistinction to agricultural land. 9- blh izdkj 1975 vkjvkjMh ist 191 = 1974 RLW 151 ij izdj.k vuqokuh ^xksiky cuke nqxkZizlkn* ds ekeys esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk tks fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS] og fuEu izdkj gS%& (a) Raj. Tenency Act, Secs. 5(24) & (2) and 207 - Raj. Land Revenue Act, Sec. 103(b) - In suit filed Civil Judge ptff. alleged that suit land, situated in Abadi of Kasba was a graden, enclosed with a pussa compound wall and leased out to defts for one year and defts were also allowed to use certain apartments - Ptff. so alleged that land of garden, converted into agri. land be defts - Defts, pleaded that suit was in respect of agri. land not cognizable by civil court - Whether Land, used for agri. purpose for a considerable time - Lease deed authorised defts, ro carry out agri. operations - Khataunis and Khasara Girdwaries also pointed that land was let or held for agril. purpose or for purpose subservient thereto - House, attached to temple and occupied by defts - Mere that land was put to agri.
purpose for a considerable time - Lease deed authorised defts, ro carry out agri. operations - Khataunis and Khasara Girdwaries also pointed that land was let or held for agril. purpose or for purpose subservient thereto - House, attached to temple and occupied by defts - Mere that land was put to agri. purposes, held no sufficient to hold that it is ``land defined u/S 5(24) which definition clearly excludes ``abadi land - Determination as to whether suit land is ``abadi land necessary - Suit land was in populated area - Merely because a portion of land in compound of temple, used as garden or for cultivation not changed character of land being ``abadi land - Grantor of patta, not fixed land revenue or rent - Land, granted by Patta was being held for building purpose - Suit land held ``abadi land on basis of evidence and facts and circumstances of the case - Contention that suit, exclusively triable by Revenue court, over - ruled.
10- Hkwfe vokfIr vf/kfu;e esa ;g izko/kku fd;s gq, gSa fd vokIr dh xbZ Hkwfe ds VkbZVy ds lEc/k esa dksbZ fookn gksxk rks mldk fuLrkj.k mDr ,DV ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr fdl izdkj fd;k tk;sxkA vokIr dh gqbZ Hkwfe ds ckcr jktLo U;k;ky; esa [kkrsnkjh dk okn izLrqr dj vokfIr dk;Zokgh dks csvlj drbZ ugha fd;k tk ldrkA nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa us fookfnr Hkwfe vjcu gksrs gq, Hkh orZeku jsLiksMsaV dks mlds [kkrsnkjh ds vf/kdkj dh ?kks"k.kk dh gS] og voS/kkfud gSA jktLFkku gkmflax cksMZ }kjk okni= ds tokc nkos ds foks"k dFku ds isjk uEcj 11 esa jktLFkku gkmflax cksMZ dh /kkjk & 50 ds rgr uksfVl fn;s cxSj nkok pyus ;ksX; ugha crk;k gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk bl vkifRr ij dksbZ rudh dk;e ugha dh xbZA ;g vkifRr fokq) :Ik ls dkuwuh vkifRr gSA jktLo e.My }kjk jktLFkku gkmflax cksMZ ,DV dh /kkjk 50 ds lEcU/k esa fuEufyf[kr fofup;ksa esa fuEufyf[kr fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;s gS] tks bl izdkj gS%& jktLFkku gkmflax cksMZ cuke ek/kksjke ¼1997 vkjvkjMh ist 265½ esa ;g izfrikfnr fd;k gS%& ``Rajasthan Tenancy Act, Section 188 - Rajasthan Housing Board act, Section 50 - Code of Civil Procedure, Order 7, Rule 11 - Trial Court dismissed the suit being not maintainable after hearing the parties on the application under Order 7, Rule 11 - Second appeal - Held, expiry of two months notice is a must u/s. 50 before filing the suit in the instant case - Order of trial Court, upheld and order of R.A.A., set aside. jktLFkku gkmflax cksMZ] dksVk cuke jesk pUnz ¼2001 vkjvkjMh 470½ esa ;gh fl)kar crk;k x;k gS%& ``Rajasthan Tenancy Act, Section 188 - Appeal against order of R.A.A. - Suit filed by respondent without giving prior notice to Housing Board - Two months notice must be given u/s. 50 of Rajasthan Housing Board Act, 1970 to the Board before filing the suit - Orders of subordinate Courts, set aside. /kkjk 50 ds uksfVl dk fcUnq dkuwuh fcUnq gS ftls f}rh; vihy es mBkus dk vihykUV dh vf/kdkfjrk gSA bl lEcU/k esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk 1992¼1½ vkj-,y-vkj- ist 716 esa tks fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS] og bl izdkj gS%& (c) ``C.P.C., 1908, S. 100 - Legal question sought to be raised for the first time at stage of second appeal - premissibility of - Court allowed it to be raised.
11- izLrqr izdj.k esa fuZfookn :i ls u rks /kkjk 50 jktLFkku gkmflax cksMZ ,DV ds rgr rFkk u gh ;wvkbZVh ,DV dh /kkjk 98 ds rgr okn ls iwoZ dksbZ uksfVl tkjh fd;s cxSj mDr uksfVlksa ds izLrqr okn dks Lohdkj dj fMØh djus dk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fof/k fo:) gSA 12- izLrqr izdj.k esa ;g Lohd`r rF; gS fd oknh us fopkj.k U;kk;y; esa tks nLrkost isk fd;s gSa muesa ewy nLrkost u gksdj QksVks dksih gS mudks lk{; ds :i esa eku dj fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k x;k gS rFkk mudks iznkZ Hkh ugha fd;k x;kA ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; us orZeku vihykUV }kjk bl lEcU/k esa izLrqr dh xbZ vkifRr dks njfdukj djrs gq, fdlh Hkh nLrkost dks iznkZ djuk t:jh ugha ekukA bl laca/k esa bl U;k;ky; ds le{k Hkh jsLiksMsUV ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us ;gh nyhy nh gS tks ekuus ;ksX; ugha gSA 13- ,-vkbZ-vkj 1975 lqizhe dksVZ ist 1748 esa ds vuqlkj fdlh Hkh ewy nLrkost dh txg QksVks&dksih izLrqr djus dks oS/kkfud ugha ekuk x;k gS] bl lEcU/k esa tks fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS] og fuEu izdkj gS%& (A) Evidence Act (1872), Section 65 of manuscript of leaflet - Successful candidate not shown to be in possession of original - Document, not above suspicion - Leading of secondary evidence - Not permissible. Where in an election petition by an elector challenging the election of successful candidate to the Legislative Assembly the petitioner sought to file a photo state copy of the manuscript of a leaflet alleged to have been written by that candidate making defamatory and false averments against an unsuccessful candidate and the petitioner failed to explain as to what were the circumstances under which the photostat copy was preparedand who were in possession of the original document at the time its photo-graph was taken, the photostat copy being not above suspiction the petitioner could not be permitted to lead secondary evidence in the scape of photostate copy when therewas neither any averment not any material to show that the original document was in possession of the successful candidate. Ele.Pten. No. 36 of 1972. D/21.7.1973 (Madh. Pra.) Affirmed. 14- blh izdkj ,vkbZvkj 1946 ,llh ist 24 ij tks fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;kx;k gS] og fuEu izdkj gS%& AIR (33) 1946 Privy Council 24 : ``Babula Anand Behari Lal vs. Messrs, Dinshaw and Co; Bankers Lal; Lucknow.
Ele.Pten. No. 36 of 1972. D/21.7.1973 (Madh. Pra.) Affirmed. 14- blh izdkj ,vkbZvkj 1946 ,llh ist 24 ij tks fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;kx;k gS] og fuEu izdkj gS%& AIR (33) 1946 Privy Council 24 : ``Babula Anand Behari Lal vs. Messrs, Dinshaw and Co; Bankers Lal; Lucknow. Evidence Act(1872), S. 65 - Loss of original pleaded and copy offered in evidence - Copy cannot be admitted unless loss of original is proved and copy is proved to be a correct copy. 15- izLrqr izdj.k esa nLrkostkr dh QksVks izfr isk djrs le; orZeku jsLiksMsaV }kjk bl laca/k esa dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha fn;k fd nLrkost dh ewy izfr vFkok izekf.kr lR;izfr mudks izkIr ugha gks ldrh FkhA jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; ds voyksdu ls Hkhizrhr gksrk gS fd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us vihy dk fu.kZ; djrs le; lhihlh ds vksMZj 41 :y 31 ds izko/kkuksa dh vuns[kh djrs gq, lHkh rudh;ksa ij vyx vyx fu"d"kZ ugha fudkyk gSA bl izdkj fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk okn Lohdkj djus rFkk jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh }kjk orZeku vihykUV dh vihy dks [kkfjt djus dk fu.kZ; fof/k ds loZekU; fl)karksa ds izfrdwy gksus ls fujLr ;ksX; gSA 16- mijksDr foospu ds vk/kkj ij ;g f}rh; vihy Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa lgk;d ftyk/khk ¼eq[;ky;½ chdkusj }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 10-11-97 ,oa jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] chdkusj dk fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 17-3-98 dks fujLr djrs gq, orZeku izR;kFkhZx.k }kjk nk;j@izLrqr fd;s x;s okn dks fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA 17- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA[ 2005 DIGILAW 866 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]