Judgment 1. We have heard learned Counsel for the appellant and perused the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition. 2. The appellant had taken a loan of Rs.4.50 lacs in the year 2001 from the respondent Bank for purchase of tourist bus. The recovery proceedings are being taken against the appellant as he has been found to be defaulter. Before the learned Single Judge a statement was made by the Counsel for the appellant that he is prepared to deposit the entire amount. Similar stand has been taken before this Court. However, the appellant has been shifting his stand. Attempt has been to take the Court into matter of calculation as well as the interest part. We are not inclined to entire into such controversy. The repeated opportunities was given to the appellant to settle the account has been misused. No interference is warranted with the order of the learned Single Judge. 3. The special appeal stands dismissed.