Judgment :- (Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 16.04.1998 made in M.C.O.P. No: 3146 of 1995 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (V Judge, Court of Small Causes), Chennai.) The claimant in M.C.O.P. No: 3146 of 1995 has preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal challenging the quantum awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (V Judge, Court of Small Causes), Chennai, by its judgment dated 16.04.1998 in the above M.C.O.P. 2. The facts leading to the filing of this appeal are: On 17.03.1995, at 3.00 p.m. when the minor R. Kumaresan was crossing the road at the junction of North Mada Street and Sengeni Pillayar Koil Street at Chennai, due to the rash and negligent driving of the scooter, bearing Registration No: TN 07 2576, belonging to first respondent, the scooter hit against the minor. Consequent to the accident, Kumaresan sustained grievous injuries and hence he filed a claim petition claiming a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- as compensation. But, the Tribunal has passed an award to the tune of Rs.21,000/-. Aggrieved against the amount granted by the Tribunal, the claimant is before this Court in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that as per the disability certificate, the permanent disability of the claimant is assessed at 15% for which the Tribunal has awarded only a sum of Rs.15,000/- as against the claim of Rs.64,000/-. Besides, the Tribunal has not awarded any amount under the heading loss of earning power. He would therefore submit that the quantum awarded by the Tribunal should be interfered with and the same should be enhanced. 4. The learned counsel for the respondent on the other hand would contend that since the injured is only a minor, the question of awarding any amount under the heading loss of earning capacity does not arise; besides contending that for the disability of 15% the award of Rs.15,000/- is reasonable. He would also add that since the injured is a minor the amount awarded under the other conventional heads are also reasonable. 5. I have heard the learned counsel on either side. As per the finding of the Tribunal, because of the said accident the claimant/ minor had suffered a fracture in both the knees in addition to an injury in the ankle. 5. I have heard the learned counsel on either side. As per the finding of the Tribunal, because of the said accident the claimant/ minor had suffered a fracture in both the knees in addition to an injury in the ankle. The age of the claimant was only 7 years at the time of the accident. In my considered opinion, the injuries sustained by him will have an impact on the physical condition of the injured. Certainly that would affect his earning power as well. That apart, since the injured was studying in first standard at the time of the accident, because of the injuries sustained by him in the accident, even in his life as a student he cannot enjoy which the other students of this age group can. His options with regard to his higher education viz. his professional choices will also be restricted. Therefore, certainly the injured is eligible to get some amount under the head loss of earning power. In my opinion, awarding a sum of Rs.20,000/- to the injured under the head loss of earning power would be reasonable. 6. The injured had suffered a fracture in both the knees and also in the ankle. Hence, the Tribunal ought to have awarded compensation under the head pain and suffering. In my opinion, awarding a sum of Rs.5,000/- under the head pain and suffering, is reasonable under the circumstances of the case. As per the order of the Tribunal, the total amount awarded is Rs.21,000/-. But in fact actually Tribunal has awarded compensation only to the tune of Rs.16,000/- (Rs.15,000/- for the disability; Rs.500/- towards transport expenses and Rs.500/- for extra nourishment). The amount of Rs.500/- awarded for nutritious food is also low since the appellant was under treatment for quite some time. Hence, I enhance the same to Rs.1,000/-. 7. In the result, the appellant/claimant is eligible for an enhanced amount of Rs.25,500/- in addition to what was awarded by the Tribunal. Totally the claimant is entitled for a compensation of Rs.41,500/- that can be rounded of as Rs.42,000/-. As regards the rate of interest, the Tribunal has awarded 12% interest for the compensation awarded by it. But as per the Supreme Court judgment, the claimant is entitled to 9% interest from the date of the claim petition till 31.12.2000 and at the rate of 7.5% from 01.01.2001 till the date of payment. As regards the rate of interest, the Tribunal has awarded 12% interest for the compensation awarded by it. But as per the Supreme Court judgment, the claimant is entitled to 9% interest from the date of the claim petition till 31.12.2000 and at the rate of 7.5% from 01.01.2001 till the date of payment. For the enhanced amount, the claimant is entitled to interest at the rate of 7.5% from the date of the claim petition till the date of payment. With the above, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands ordered accordingly.