G. P. SRIVASTVA, J. ( 1 ) HEARD learned Counsel for the applicants and learned A. G. A. ( 2 ) IT is alleged that the applicant committed rape upon the victim a married lady of 45 years of age. It is argued by the learned Counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated because the victim was not paying grinding charge of his flour mill. The argument is unacceptable because a lady of this age will not put her prestige at stake on flimsy ground. ( 3 ) THE F. I. R. was lodged by the husband of the victim and it cannot be imagine that a husband will involved his wife in such type of cases without any substantial gain. No ground for bail is made out. The bail application is rejected. . .