ORDER : 1. Leave granted. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the Appellant has submitted that the learned single Judge has come to the conclusion that "I am prima facie of the opinion that the disputes raised by the Petitioner do arise from the said Agreement and the MOU. The disputes, therefore, require to be referred to arbitration as agreed under clause 10 of the agreement.", but without giving any reasons that how prima facie he is satisfied that the dispute exists and required to be referred to arbitration as per the Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement. Learned single Judge has not passed a detailed reasoned order for coming to the aforesaid conclusion. This Court in the case of SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering Ltd. and Another, (2005) 8 SCC 618 , has held that since the order for appointment of an Arbitrator is a judicial order, learned Single Judge should give a reasoned order while arriving at a conclusion that the dispute requires to be referred to arbitration. The submission of learned counsel is correct. In our opinion, no reasons whatsoever have been recorded by the learned Single Judge while referring the dispute to arbitration except conclusion. We, accordingly, set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 26.4.2006 and remit the case back to the learned Single Judge to decide the issue afresh in light of the decision of this Court in the case of Patel Engineering Ltd. (supra) by a detailed reasoned order. It is expected that the learned single Judge will dispose of the matter expeditiously. 3. The Appeal stands disposed of accordingly.