Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2006 DIGILAW 1084 (RAJ)
Gopisingh v. State of Raj.
2006-04-04
M.S.KHAN
body2006
[kku] lnL;-&;g utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= e.My dh ,dy ihB ds fu.kZ; fnukad 23-7-2003 ds fo:) jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 229 ds vUrxZr izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd izkFkhZx.k us lgk;d vk;qä mifuosku dksyk;r ds le{k vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 88] 188 ,oa Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 125] 136 ds rgr fooknxzLr Hkwfe ds ckcr~ okn izLrqr fd;k ftUgksaus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 22-2-88 ds }kjk oknh dks xSj [kkrsnkj jsdkMZ esa vafdr djus ds vknsk fn;s ,oa blh vkk; dh fMØh tkjh dhA bl fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 22-2-88 dks fujLr djkus gsrq ;g jsQjsUl e.My esa izsf"kr fd;k x;k Fkk ftls e.My dh ,dy ihB us vius fu.kZ; fnukad 27-3-2003 ds }kjk Lohdkj dj lgk;d vk;qä mifuosku dksyk;r ds fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 22-2-88 dks fujLr djus ds vknsk fn;sA blls O;fFkr gksdj ;g utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= e.My ds le{k isk fd;k x;k gSA 3- mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl utjlkuh ds ,Mehku ij lquh xbZA 4- izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= esa vafdr rF;ksa dks gh foLrkj iwoZd nksgjk;k vkSj dFku fd;k fd ekuuh; U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; esa dqN Li"Vr;k ifjyf{kr Hkwy jg xbZ gS ftlls U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; fjO;w fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA 5- blds foijhr jktdh; vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd bl izdj.k esa fjO;q izkFkZuk i= 3 o"kZ ckn izLrqr fd;k x;k gS tks fd vizR;kfkr foyEc gksus ds dkj.k utjlkuh esUVsusfcy ugha gSA vius i{k ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1998 ,l-lh- 2276 dh uthj isk dhA mUgksaus ;g Hkh dFku fd;k fd iwoZ ,dy ihB dk fu.kZ; izkFkhZ ds odhy dh ekStwnxh esa ikfjr fd;k x;k gS blfy;s fMys dUMksu ugha fd;k tkuk pkfg;sA eSfjV~l ij cgl djrs gq;s crk;k fd izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd bl izdj.k esa dksbZ ,jj visjsUV vku nh Qsl vkWQ jsdkMZ ugha crk ik;s gS vr% ;g fjO;q [kkfjt fd;k tkuk pkfg;sA vius i{k ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1995 ,l-lh- 455] MCyw ,y lh 2003 oksY;we 1 ,l-lh- ist 499] vkj-vkj-Vh- 2005 ist 545 dh uthjsa isk dhA 6- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- loZizFke rks ;g fjO;w izkFkZuk i= rhu o"kZ foyEc ls izLrqr fd;k x;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd }kjk tks dkj.k crk;s x;s gS og lUrks"ktud ugha dgs tk ldrs D;ksafd iwoZ ,dy ihB dk fu.kZ; izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dh ekStwnxh esa ikfjr fd;k x;k FkkA blfy;s bl fcUnq ij gh ;g fjO;w izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA tgkW rd eSfjV~l dk izu gS izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd viuh cgl esa dksbZ ,jj visjsUV vku jsdkMZ ugha crk ik;s gSA fjO;q izdj.kksa ds lEcU/k esa ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1995 ,l-lh- 455 esa ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd& "Civil P.C. (5 of 1908) O. 47 R. 1—Review—Error apparent on face of record—Means an error which strike one on mere looking at record and would not require anylong drawn process of reasoning on points where there may conceivably be two opinions.
MCyw ,y lh 2003 oksY;we&1 ,l-lh- ist 499 ea Hkh iqu% bl ckr dks nksgjk;k x;k gS fd& Civil Procedure Code, O. 47 R. 1—Scope—Hearing of Review does not mean giving one more chance for rehearing matter already disposed of—High Court in hearing Review as if it was rehearing whole petition overstepped its limits—Order of High Court set aside and original order restored. vkj vkj Vh 2005 ist 545 esa ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd& Code of Civil Procedure, 1908—Order 47 Rule 1—Review—Point that has been held & decided—View taken in the judgment may be erroneous but can not be a ground for review. 8- vr% mijksä of.kZr leLr rF;ksa dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ,oa U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s ;g utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= ,Mehku LVst ij gh [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gS ,oa jktLo e.My dh iwoZ ,dy ihB ds fu.kZ; fnukad 27-3-2003 dks ;Fkkor j[kk tkrk gSA 9- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA[ 2006 DIGILAW 1084 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]