Judgment 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. The delay in filing of this appeal is condoned. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the order impugned is not a speaking order, nor any reason has been assigned categorically rejecting the claims of the writ petitioners. 4. It appears that the learned Single Judge of this Court dismissed the writ application merely on the ground that writ petitioner no.1 applied for appointment on compassionate ground beyond a period of five years provided for in accordance with the Government instructions. There is no finding of the Court as to under what circumstances the application or claim of the petitioners was barred. 5. In this view of the matter, the order impugned is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the appropriate bench to re-hear the same and pass necessary orders in accordance with law.