Judgment 1. Heard. 2. This is an application for quashing the order dated 31.3.2006 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari, in Sessions Trial No. 143/2002 whereby and whereunder he has summoned the petitioners under Section 319 Cr. P.C. 3. From the impugned order it appears that two prosecution witnesses who were earlier discharged have been recalled for the purpose of their cross-examination by the accused on payment of cost has not been challenged. 4. So far the bone of contention is concerned, these petitioners have been summoned on the petition filed under Section 319 Cr. P.C. to face the trial. Initially, these petitioners were not shown as sent up for trial in the chargesheet by the Investigating Officer and the informant accordingly moved this Court in Cr. Misc. No.12984/2003 which was disposed of with an observation to consider this aspect of the submission of the informant in case of some legal evidence is led in course of trial. On tiie basis of the observations of this Court, evidence of the witnesses were led in the trial and they did support the involvement of these petitioners in the case and as such in the impugned order the learned trial court has referred the evidence of almost all the witnesses who have supported the participation of these petitioners in the alleged murder of two persons, Mishri Rai and Ram Nandan Rai. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has, no doubt, attempted to justify in his argument that law does not permit such inclusion of the accused persons at this stage i.e. at the fag end of the trial. But it was strongly controverted by the learned counsel for O.P. No. 2 on the ground that the interest of justice should be served and the delay in trial or the stage of the trial should not come in the way when the interest of justice is at stake. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I do not find any illegality or jurisdictional error in the impugned order and no interference in it is required. 7. In the result, this application is dismissed. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in accordance with law at the earliest.