Judgment 1. By this writ application the petitioner seeks a direction for re-investigation and for taking action against the erring investigating officer. 2. It is submitted that the informant has subsequently in a statement u/s 164 Cr.PC. stated that the FIR, as registered purporting to be on the basis of a statement, which is not what he had given to the police. Petitioner further states that it is now established that the petitioner was nowhere nor seen but was hospitalised and virtually not in a position to move. In spite of that investigating officer has submitted charge-sheet on the basis of which the court has proceeded. 3. In my view, proper remedy for the petitioner is to move the trial court before whom the matter is pending. The allegation, counter-allegation, alibi or otherwise are all disputed question of fact, which required to be established in course of trial. It would thus be open to the petitioner to raise all issues before the trial court. The trial court has sufficient power to direct further investigation if it finds that the investigation has not been properly conducted. Similarly it has power to order for prosecution of those persons who have lodged a false information or party to false prosecution. 4. With this observation this writ application stands disposed of.