Judgment G.K. Vyas, J.-Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. According to Counsel for the petitioner, the learned revisional Court has dismissed the revision petition on the ground that the Judgment reported in 2005 (2) RCrD 99, (Teja Ram vs. State of Rajasthan, has been passed by this Court while exercising the powers under Section 482, CrPC, therefore, the revision petition is not maintainable. It is contended by the Counsel for the petitioner that his Tractor No. RRC-2990 and trolley were seized by the police in connection with FIR No. 105/2005 registered against the petitioner for committing offence under Sections 41 and 42 of the Forest Act. 3. It is contended at bar by the Counsel for petitioner that the petitioner is registered owner of the vehicle in question, therefore, the vehicle may be released to him upon Supurdginama. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case. While exercising powers under Section 482, CrPC and following the Judgment rendered in case to Teja Ram (Supra), the learned trial Court is directed to release the vehicle to the petitioner on Supurdginama on his furnishing one surety in the sum of Rs. 50,000/-to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of .