Radha Swami Bus Service v. State Transport Commissioner, Punjab
2006-04-21
JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, P.S.PATWALIA
body2006
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment J. S. Khehar, J. 1. The petitioner is stated to have submitted an application for grant of a permit on the Bathinda-Chandigarh via Barnala-Ludhiana route. 2. He is also stated to have deposited the application fee prescribed therefor. It is, however, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that no decision has been taken on the aforestated application submitted by the petitioner by the Regional Transport Authority, Ferozepur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied if the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2 i. e. the Regional Transport Authority, Ferozepur, requiring it to take a final decision on the application. Notice of motion. 4. On our asking, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Additional Advocate general, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. Learned counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection to the disposal of the instant writ petition in terms of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of the above, without going into the claim raised by the petitioner, we consider it just and appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition by directing respondent No.2 i. e. the Regional Transport authority, Ferozepur, to take a final decision on the application filed by the petitioner on 22.10.2005 (Annexure P1) by passing a well reasoned speaking order within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Disposed of accordingly. --- *** ---