Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 1599 (RAJ)

RICHHPAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2006-05-10

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS

body2006
Judgment ( 1 ) I have heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. I have also perused the challan papers. ( 2 ) IT is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that in this case accused persons namely om Prakash, Vijay Kumar and Virendra have already ben enlarged on bail and against them there is no specific allegation. Further, it is contended that the case of the present applicant is not distinguishable from that of other co-accused because there is no specific allegation against him for inflicting any specific injury. ( 3 ) TAKING into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. ( 4 ) ACCORDINGLY, the application filed under section 439 Cr. P. C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant Richhpal S/o Kashi Ram shall be released on bail (in FIR No. 49/2005 P. S. Ghamoorwali District sri Ganganagar) provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- and furnishes two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so, till the completion of trial.