Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 1608 (RAJ)

State of Rajasthan v. Budha

2006-05-10

M.S.KHAN

body2006
[kku] lnL;—;g jsQjsUl vfrfjä ftyk dysDVj Hkjriqj ds }kjk vius vknsk fnukad 29-7-2000 ds }kjk jktLo e.My vtesj dks ÁLrqr fd;k x;k gSA 2- la{ksi esa Ádj.k ds rF; bl Ádkj gS fd rglhynkj :iokl us v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa ÁkFkZuk i= ÁLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k fd [kljk uEcj 1028@616] 622 jdck 11 ch?kk 10 fcLok] 13 jdck 6 ch?kk] 19 fcLok] 14 jdck 2 ch?kk 6 fcLok] 15 jdck 1 ch?kk 2 fcLok] 16 jdck 2 ch?kk 14 fcLok] 894@344-347 jdck 4 ch?kk 5 fcLok] 944@394] 395 jdck 3 ch?kk 19 fcLok] 429 jdck 1 ch?kk] 433 feu jdck 13 fcLok] 434 jdck 2 ch?kk 6 fcLok] 339 jdck 17 fcLok dqy fdrk 11 jdck 37 ch?kk 11 fcLok okds xzke okjgeklh rglhy :iokl esa fLFkr gS tks efUnj Jh y{ke.k th egkjkt oSadVsoj fojkteku Hkjriqj kgj dks o,ot Hkksx jkt iqU;kFkZ vrk QjekbZ xbZ FkhA fookfnr Hkwfe fely cUnkscLr lEor~ 1985 esa efUnj Jh y{ke.k th egkjkt ds uke ntZ Fkh rFkk tekcUnh lEor~ 2016 esa efunj ds uke vafdr gSA fooknxzLr Hkwfe ij vÁkFkhZ us tfj;s ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 124 [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj ÁkIr dj fy;s gSA ewfrZ efUnj kkor fdkksj gksus ds dkj.k vo;Ld dh Js.kh esa vkrh gS o jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 46¼1½ ds vUrxZr fu/kkZfjr v;ksX;rk j[krs gSA Lohdkj fd;k x;k mä ukekUrjdj.k [kkfjt ;ksX; gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us nksuksa i{kksa dks lqudj ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 124 dks fujLr fd;s tkus gsrq ;g jsQjsUl e.My dks Ásf"kr fd;k x;k gSA 3- mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA 4- ÁkFkhZ jkT; ljdkj dh vksj ls vfrfjä jktdh; vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd fooknxzLr Hkwfe ewfrZ efUnj ,oa lkoZtfud mi;ksx dh gSA vr% mUgksaus bl Hkwfe dks iqu% ewfrZ efUnj ds uke ntZ djus dh ÁkFkZuk dhA vius i{k ds leFkZu esa vkj-vkj-Mh- 1994 ist 1 ,oa ttesaV VwMs ekpZ 2004 ,l-lh- ikVZ 1 esa Ádkfkr fu.kZ; i`Foh yky cuke~ cksMZ vkWQ jsosU;w ,.M vnlZ dh uthjsa isk dhA jsQjsUl foyEc ls ÁLrqr djus ds lEcU/k esa mUgksaus vkj-vkj-Mh- 1993 ist 411 ,oa vkj-vkj-Mh- 2002 ist 1 dh uthjsa isk dhA 5- vÁkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd ;g jsQjsUl fel dUlhOM gSA fooknxzLr Hkwfe efUnj dh [kqndkr dh Hkwfe ugha gSA 46 o"kZ ckn jsQjsUl ÁLrqr fd;k x;k gS tks esUVsusfcy ugha gSA vius i{k dh leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkj-vkj-Mh- 2005 ist 669 dh uthj isk dhA 6- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- vfrfjä dysDVj us vius jsQjsUl fu.kZ; esa ;g fu"d"kZ fudkyk gS fd ;g fufoZokn gS fd ;g Hkwfe efUnj Jh y{ke.k th egkjkt ds uke FkhA efUnj ekQh dh Hkwfe ij fdlh Hkh O;fä dks ;k egUr iqtkjh dks [kkrsnkjh jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 19 ds rgr ugha nh tk ldrh gSA jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 46 esa Hkh ,slh Hkwfe;ksa ij fdlh Hkh O;fä dks [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj fn;s tkus ij ÁfrcU/k fd;k x;k gSA vÁkFkhZ;ku us efUnj dh Hkwfe ij vius vkidks jktLo fjdkMZ esa ntZ djk fy;k x;kA rRipkr~ ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 124 }kjk [kkrsnkjh ntZ djk yhA bl ukekUrjdj.k esa rglhynkj }kjk jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 19 dsrgr [kkrsnkjh ntZ fd;s tkus dh vkKk nh xbZ gSA tcfd ewfrZ efUnj tks lrr~ vo;Ld gS fd Hkwfe ij jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 15 o 19 ds rgr fdlh Hkh O;fä dks [kkrsnkjh ugha nh tk ldrh gSA vr% rglhynkj }kjk Loh—r fd;k x;k ukekUrjdj.k dkfcy fujLr gSA 8- ewfrZ efUnj lrr~ vo;Ld gS ftldh Hkwfe dk gLrkUrj.k /kkjk 46 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e ds Áko/kkuksa ds foijhr gSA tSlk fd vkj-vkj-Mh- 1994 ist 1 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gSA jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds mä fu.kZ; dks ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us ttesaV VwMs ekpZ 2004 ,l-lh- ikVZ 1 esa Ádkfkr fu.kZ; i`Foh yky cuke~ cksMZ vkWQ jsosU;w ,.M vnlZ ds dsl esa vigsYM fd;k gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fuEu Ádkj ls gS & Having heard learned counsel of the parties on either side, we are satisfied that the common impugned order which is under challenge in these appeals, does not call for interference at the hands of this Court. The High Court has elaborately considered the respective contentins looking to the facts and also the record as well as the position of law. In the view, it is unnecessary to us to support them again at we agree with the conclusions recorded by the High Court. tgka rd jsQjsUl foyEc ls ÁLrqr fd;s tkus dk Áu gS fof/k fo:) (illegal) fu.kZ; dks dHkh Hkh fujLr djk;k tk ldrk gSA bl lEcU/k esa vkj-vkj-Mh- 1999 ist 411 esa ;g fl)kUr Áfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd & Limitation Act Section 3 — Entries regarding title changed by Asstt. Land Records Officer on the basis of application by opposite party though during settlement operations existing entries can be changed only in accordance with decree/judgment of competent Court, legal transfer deed or order of Court — Order, void ab initio and could be set aside at any time — No question of limitation involved — Order of Settlement Commissioner, setting aside impugned order cannot be assailed. blh lEcU/k esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; dh [k.M ihB us ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1994 ,l-lh- 1128] 1990¼1½ vkj-,y-vkj- 556] 2000¼2½ vkj-,y-vkj- 39] ¼1994½ 4 ,l-,l-lh- 575] ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1964 ,l-lh- 1536 esa Áfrikfnr fl)kUrksa dks Qksyksa djrs gq;s vkj-vkj-Mh- 2002 ist 1 esa ;g fl)kUr Áfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& Raj. Land Revenue (Allotment of Land for Agricultural Purposes) Rules, 1970, Rule 14(4) — Cancellation of allotment — Allotment obtained by petitioner appellant by misrepresenting the fact that she was landless person whereas 43 bighas 5 biswas land already existing in favour of her husband-petitioner acquired khatedari rights after 10 years — Allotment cancelled by Collector after 30 years — Validity of — Held, allotment order being bad in eye of law being obtained by misrepresentation can be said to be ineffective — Conferment of khatedari right is only consequential which also cannot be maintained — Long lapse of time cannot be considered sufficient to save such allotment order obtained by misrepresenta-tion — Order of Collector not liable to be interfered with. 9- vr% mijksä rF;ksa] dkuwuh Áko/kkuksa ,oa U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s vfrfjä ftyk dysDVj Hkjriqj }kjk ÁLrqr ;g jsQjsUl Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk [kljk uEcj 1028@616] 622 jdck 11 ch?kk 10 fcLok] 13 jdck 6 ch?kk 19 fcLok] 14 jdck 2 ch?kk 6 fcLok] 15 jdck 1 ch?kk 2 fcLok] 16 jdck 2 ch?kk 14 fcLok] 894@344-347 jdck 4 ch?kk 5 fcLok] 944@394] 395 jdck 3 ch?kk 19 fcLok] 429 jdck 2 ch?kk 6 fcLok] 339 jdck 17 fcLok dqy fdrk 11 jdck 37 ch?kk 11 fcLok okds xzke okjgeklh rglhy :iokl dh Hkwfe dks efUnj Jh y{ke.k th egkjkt oSadVsoj fojkteku Hkjriqj kgj ds uke ntZ djus ds vknsk fn;s tkrs gSA blh vuqlj.k esa vÁkFkhZx.k ds uke Loh—r fd;k x;k ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 124 dks Hkh fujLr djus ds vknsk fn;s tkrs gSA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA