Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2006 DIGILAW 1696 (RAJ)
Tara Chand v. Mukesh
2006-05-16
B.L.MEENA, M.S.KHAN
body2006
eh.kk] lnL;-&;g vihy vUrxZr /kkjk 225 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ds rgr Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] vyoj }kjk vihy la- 3@98 esa ikfjr fd;s x;s fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 24-6-1999 ds fo:) bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd vihyk.V@oknhx.k us ,d okn vUrxZr /kkjk 88 o 188 jkLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ds rgr jsLiksaMsaV la-1 o rjrhch jsLiksaMsaV 3] 4] 5 ds fo:) mi[k.M vf/kdkjh fdkux<+okl ds U;k;ky; esa oknxzLr vkjkth [k-ua- 886@0-14] 915@2-10] 918@3-5] 1170@0-4] 1199@1-1] 1200@1-00] 1202@1-10] 1204@0-13] 1208@0-16] 1212@1] 3] 1216@0-7] 1224@1-4 dqy fdrk 12 jdck 14 ch?kk 10 fcLok tks fd xzke ukaxyk lkfy;k esa fLFkr gSA rFkk [k-ua- 40@6-12] 46@1-17] 48@2-12 fdrk 3 jdck 11-01 ch?kk [k-ua- 45@4-5 esa 1@4 fgLlk gS tks fd xzke dknbZ;k rglhy fdkux<+okl esa fLFkr gS] ckcr~ izLrqr fd;kA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us okn izLrqr gksus ij nkos ,oa tokcnkos ds vk/kkj ij 7 rudh;kr dk;e dhA eqdíek fnukad 16-7-1990 ls izfroknhx.k dh lk{; esa pyrk jgk rFkk muds }kjk dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha djus ds dkj.k fnukad 9-4-1997 dks ,drjQk dk;Zokgh ds vknsk ikfjr fd;s x;sA rRipkr~ fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vihyk.V@oknhx.k dh cgl lqudj okn dks Lohdkj dj vius fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 29-9-1997 ds }kjk e`rd ;ksnku ds iq=@iqf=;ksa o csok dk vkjkth esa 1@7-1@7 fgLls dk [kkrsnkj ?kksf"kr dj fn;k rFkk jktLo fjdkMZ esa vey njken ds vknsk iznku dj fn;s rFkk jsLiksaMsaV vly izfroknhx.k dks ikcUn dj fn;k fd vkjkth dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls jgu o eqUrfdy vkfn ugha djsA mä fu.kZ; o fMØh ds fo:) Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] vyoj ds U;k;ky; esa vihy izLrqr dh ftls mUgksaus vius fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 24-6-1999 ds }kjk mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] fdkux<+okl ds fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 29-9-1997 dks fujLr dj iqu% vly jsLiksaMsaV@izfroknhx.k dks lk{; o lquokbZ dk volj iznku dj fu.kZ; djus gsrq fjek.M fd;kA bl fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 24-6-1999 ds fo:) ;g vihy bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 3- geus odqyk; Qjhdsu dh cgl vihy ij lquhA 4- vihyk.V ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh us bl ckr ij xkSj ugha fd;k fd vly jsLiksaMsaV@izfroknhx.k nkos esa mifLFkr gq, Fks vkSj mUgksaus viuk tokcnkok isk fd;k Fkk o mlds ckn oknh dh lk{; iw.kZ gks xbZ Fkh rFkk izfroknhx.k dh lk{; esa eqdíek fnukad 16-7-1990 ls 8-4-1997 rd pyrk jgk Fkk fdUrq muds }kjk dksbZ lk{; ;k xokg ds c;ku ugha djk;s vkSj U;k;ky; esa fnukad 9-4-1997 dks og gkftj ugha gq, uk gh muds vfHkHkk"kd gkftj gq,A rc U;k;ky; us fnukad 9-4-1997 dks ,drjQk dk;Zokgh dk vknsk fn;k vkSj ;g vknsk fof/klEer Fkk rFkk ,drjQk vknsk dks fujLr djus dh dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh xbZA bl dkj.k vihy esa U;k;ky; dks izdj.k dh esfjV~l ij tks lk{; jsdkMZ ij Fkh] mlh ds vuqlkj fu.kZ; ikfjr djuk pkfg;s FkkA fdUrq mUgksaus fcuk fdlh vk/kkj ds v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; o fMØh dks vikLr dj izdj.k dks iqu% fjek.M djus esa dkuwuh Hkwy dh gSA mudk dFku gS fd fooknxzLr vkjkth i{kdkjksa dh eqLrjdk ifjokj dh lEifÙk gSA bl dkj.k e`rd ;ksnku ds lHkh okfjlku dk leku fgLlk gS rFkk bl rF; dks fl) djus gsrq vihyk.V }kjk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa nLrkosth lk{; tekcUnh lEor~ 2010] 2014] 2015] 2034] 2035 o feyku {ks=Qy izLrqr fd;k rFkk /kudkSj csok ;ksnku] txnhk] ykyflag] jftjke] jekyky o dj.k flag ds c;ku djk;s FksA ftlls vihyk.V dk okn iw.kZr;k fl) Fkk rFkk jsLiksaMsaV@izfroknhx.k ds }kjk bl lk{; ds fojks/k esa 7 lky rd le; ysus ds ipkr~ Hkh dksbZ lk{; isk ugha dh FkhA bl fcUnq ij jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dks jsLiksaMsaV dh vihy dks [kkfjt dj nsuh pkfg;s FkhA fdUrq fjek.M djus esa dkuwuh Hkwy dh gSA mudk dFku gS fd vknsk 41 fu;e 24 lh-ih-lh- ds vuqlkj izdj.k dks fjek.M ugha dj xq.kkoxq.k ij r; djuk pkfg;s FkkA jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh ds le{k jsliksaMsaV }kjk tks vihy izLrqr dh xbZ Fkh] og fe;kn ckgj Fkh ,oa /kkjk 5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e ds vkosnu esa tks dkj.k vafdr fd;s [TRUNCATED]
blh izdkj 2002 vkj-vkj-Vh- ikVZ 1 ist 648 ij ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us ;g vfHker O;ä fd;k gS fd %& Limitation Act, 1963—Section 5—Condonation of delay—While considering the question of condonation of delay, Court has to first consider the merit of the case—If case is a good on merits, delay ought to have been condoned. 12- vr% mijksä U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa ds ifjizs{; esa jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dk fu.kZ; gekjh jk; esa lgh gS vkSj mlesa ge fe;kn ds fcUnq ij fdlh izdkj ds gLr{ksi dh vko;drk ugha le>rs gSA 13- tgka rd bl izdj.k dh esfjV~l dk izu gS& ge bl izdj.k esa jsLiksaMsaV ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dh bl nyhy ls lger gS fd bl izdj.k esa vo;Ld jsLiksaMsaV dk lfQfl;UV fjiztsUVsku mlds xkftZ;ku }kjk ugha gks ik;k gSA vr% bl n`f"V ls ekbZuj ds fo:) ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh ufyVh dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrh gSA bl lEcU/k esa 1988 vkj-vkj-Mh- 222 gSMuksV&ch ij ;g dgk x;k gS fd%& "(b) Civil Procecure Code, Order 32, Rule 3 & 4—Decree against minor who is not represented by guardian adlitem is a nullity— AIR 1973 Mad. 12 & AIR 1968 Pat. 12 . relied upon. 1991 vkj-vkj-Mh 103 gSMuksV ch ij Hkh ;g dgk x;k gS fd %& (b) Civil Procedure Code, Order 32, Rule 3— Provision is mandatory and Court is bound to appoint a proper guardian for a minor defendant—Decree passed against minor defendant without appointing his guardian and without his proper representation must be regarded a decree passed against a person not a party to the suit or proceeding and, is therefore, without jurisdiction, null and void—In order to set aside such a decree it is not necessary to show that the minor has suffered any prejudice by non-representation.
14- i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ;g Hkh fofnr gksrk gS fd jsLiksaMsaV ds vfHkHkk"kd fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa xSjgkftj U;k;ky; dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, jsLiksaMsaV ds vfHkHkk"kd dh vuqifLFkfr gksus ij i{kdkjksa dks uksfVl nsrs rFkk fQj Hkh os mifLFkr ugha gksrs rks fQj ,d rjQk fu.kZ; ikfjr djuk pkfg;s FkkA bl lEcU/k esa 1998 vkj-,y-MCY;w- 1071 ij jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vfHker O;ä fd;k x;k gS fd%& C.P.C. Order 3, Rule 4(2) and Section 151 and Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 9—Ex-parte decree for restitution of conjugal rights—Counsel pleaded no instructions—Not conveyed to the client (wife)—Counsel was expected to show to the Court the reasons for which he was doing so—The appointment of pleader is in force until determined with the leave of the Court by a writing signed by the client or the pleader, as the case may be and filed in Court—Held—Learned District Judge has erred in proceeding ex-parte merely on pleading no instructions by the counsel for the wife. Appeal allowed.
Appeal allowed. 15- vr% bl n`f"V ls Hkh jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dk fjek.M vknsk gekjh jk; esa mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA blh izdkj i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ;g Hkh tkfgj gksrk gS fd bl izdj.k esa ;ksnku dh lsYQ ,Dok;MZ izksiVhZ dks Hkh lfEefyr dj xyr fMØh nh xbZ gSA bl n`f"V ls Hkh jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dk fu.kZ; lgh izrhr gksrk gSA vknsk 20 fu;e 5 lh-ih-lh- ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj rudhokj fu.kZ; Hkh ikfjr ugha fd;k x;k gS& tks fd dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj vko;d gSA tSlkfd 2003 vkjvkjVh 709] 1985 ,-vkbZ-vkj- lq-dks- 726 o 1984 vkj-vkj-Mh- 51 ds U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa ls Li"V gSA bl izdj.k esa vihyk.V ds vfHkHkk"kd }kjk Hkh bl izdj.k dks jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dks gh esfjV~l ij fuf.kZr djus gsrq izkFkZuk dh xbZ gSA fdUrq bl fu.kZ; ds iSjk 13] 14 o 15 ds rF;ksa ,oa U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa ds ifjizs{; esa bl izdj.k esa orZeku jsLiksaMsaV dh fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa kgknr izLrqr ugha gksus ds dkj.k ge jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh }kjk izdj.k dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks gh fjek.M djus ds vknsk dks ;Fkkor~ j[kuk U;k;ksfpr le>rs gSaA 16- vr% mijksä of.kZr leLr rF;ksa] dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ,oa U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, ;g vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh vyoj dk fu.kZ; fnukad 24-6-1999 ;Fkkor~ j[kk tkrk gSA jsdkMZ ekrgr vnkyr ykSVk;k tkosA i{kdkjku~ U;k;ky; mi[k.M vf/kdkjh fdkux<okl ¼vyoj½ esa fnukad 30-6-2006 dks mifLFkr gksosA fu.kZ; fy[kk;k tkdj [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA[ 2006 DIGILAW 1696 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]