Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 175 (RAJ)

Mitha Lal v. State of Rajasthan

2006-01-17

H.R.PANWAR

body2006
Judgment H.R. Panwar, J.-By the instant criminal revision under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (for short, “the Act” hereinafter”), on behalf of the petitioner, the order dated 112.2005 passed by the Sessions Judge, Udaipur (for short, “the Appellate Court” hereafter) in Criminal Appeal No. 194/2005 has been challenged, whereby the Appellate Court dismissed the appeal filed on behalf of the petitioner and affirmed the order dated 112.2005 passed by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Udaipur (for short, “the Juvenile Justice Board” hereinafter) passed in Criminal Case No. 381/2005. 2. The facts of the case, relevant and necessary for decision of this revision petition are that complainant T.N. Narayanan lodged an FIR on 012.2005 with Police Station, Hiranmagri, Udaipur to the effect that when he came to home at 1:15 PM and called the bell, his wife did not response. He opened the door and when entered the house, he saw the goods scattered in the bed-room and his wife was found lying in an unconscious state having her hands and legs tied with cloth. He informed his neighbourer Mathur and called the doctor on telephone. Dr. Goyal came and checked his wife. The police was informed telephonically. The police came and his wife was taken to the hospital where the doctors declared her dead. After investigation the police detained the petitioner and produced him before the Court. An application under Section 12 of the Act was filed on behalf of the petitioner for releasing him on bail on the ground that the petitioner is a minor of 14 years and his name does not find mention in the FIR. The Juvenile Justice Board, vide order dated 112.2005 dismissed the bail application on the ground that though the Probation Officer has reported that it is petitioners first offence, there is no information regarding his criminal antecedents and his conduct and behaviour are good but looking to the fact that the petitioner has left the study, his father is collecting cow-dung and doing labour work, mother does domestic works of cleaning the house and utensils etc. and his sister is also not going to school, the chances of petitioners coming in the contact of known criminals cannot be ruled out. 3. and his sister is also not going to school, the chances of petitioners coming in the contact of known criminals cannot be ruled out. 3. Aggrieved by the order of the Juvenile Justice Board, an appeal was filed which has been dismissed by the Appellate Court vide impugned order. Hence, this revision. Sub-clause (k) of Section 2 of the Act deflines "Juvenile" or "child", which reads as under:-"Section 2(k). -"Juvenile" or "child" means a person who has not completed eighteenth year of age." Section 12 of the Act reads as under:-“Section 12. Bail to Juvenile.-(1) When any person accused of a bailable or non-bailable offence, and apparently a juvenile, is arrested or detained or appears or is brought before a Board, such person shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or in any other law for the time being in force, be released on bail with or without surety but he shall not be so released if there appear reasonable grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger or that his release would defeat the ends of justice. (2) When such person having been arrested is not released on bail under Sub-section (1) by the officer-in-charge of the police station, such officer shall cause him to be kept only in an observation home in the prescribed manner until he can be brought before a Board. (3) When such person is not released on bail under Sub-section (1) by the Board it shall, instead of committing him to prison, make an order sending him to an observation home or a place of safety for such period during the pendency of the inquiry regarding him as may be specified in the order.” 4. From the perusal of Section 12 of the Act, it is clear that a delinquent juvenile ordinarily has to be released on bail irrespective of nature of offence alleged to have been committed by him, unless, it is shown by evidence that if he is released on bail, there appear reasonable grounds for believing that the release of delinquent juvenile is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger or that his release would defeat the ends of justice. Section 12 of the Act is a special provision injucting the Courts from refusing bail to a delinquent juvenile except for the reasons stated in the section itself , i.e., if he be so released there are reasonable grounds for believing that he will come into association with any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger or that his release would defeat the ends of justice. 5. At the time of consideration of bail under Section 12 of the Act, the merit or nature of offence has no relevancy. The language of Section 12 of the Act, using the word “shall” is mandatory in nature and providing non-obstante clause by using the expression “notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or any other law for the time-being in force be released on bail” shows the intention of the Legislature to grant bail to the delinquent juvenile offender by releasing him on bail who is arrested or produced before a Court; however, with exception to release him on bail if there are reasonable grounds for believing that his release is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger or that his release would defeat the ends of justice. It is for the prosecution to bring on record such material while opposing the bail and to make out any of the grounds provided in this section which may persuade the Court not to release the juvenile on bail. 6. The Act is beneficial and social-oriented legislation which needs to be given full effect by all concerned whenever the case of juvenile comes before them. In absence of any material or evidence of reasonable ground to believe that the delinquent juvenile, if released on bail, is likely to come into association with any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger, it cannot be said that his release would defeat the ends of justice. On the contrary, keeping in view the legislative intent in enacting the Act, the juvenile offender deserves to be released on bail. 7. On the contrary, keeping in view the legislative intent in enacting the Act, the juvenile offender deserves to be released on bail. 7. It is no doubt, true that the petitioner, who is a juvenile delinquent, is an offender for the offences under Sections 454, 302 IPC but looking to the fact that his name does not find mention in the FIR and the report of the Probation Officer does not show any adverse criminal antecedents, I consider it just and proper to allow the revision petition and release the petitioner on bail under Section 12 of the Act. 8. Consequently, the revision petition is allowed. The orders of the Juvenile Justice Board as well as of the Appellate Court declining bail to the juvenile delinquent are set aside and it is directed that he shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond by his natural guardian in the sum of Rs. 5,000/-and a surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board with a stipulation that on all subsequent dates of hearing, he shall appear before the said Court or any other Court during pendency of inquiry in the case and that the guardian shall keep proper look after of the delinquent child and keep him away from the company of known criminals.