Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 1752 (RAJ)

Chhittar v. State of Rajasthan

2006-05-18

M.S.KHAN

body2006
[kku] lnL;—;g utjlkuh ÁkFkZuk i= e.My dh ,dy ihB ds fu.kZ; fnukad 13-7-2000 ds fo:) jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 229 ds vUrxZr ÁLrqr fd;k x;k gSA 2- Ádj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl Ádkj gSa fd lgk;d dysDVj pkdlw dSEi lkaxkusj }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 27-9-1986 dks fujLr fd;s tkus gsrq ftyk dysDVj t;iqj }kjk jsQjsUl e.My dks Ásf"kr fd;k x;kA e.My dh ,dy ihB ds fu.kZ; fnukad 13-7-2000 }kjk jsQjsUl Lohdkj fd;k tkdj ijh{k.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 27-9-1986 dks fujLr dj fn;kA blls O;fFkr gksdj ;g fjO;w vkosnu e.My ds le{k isk fd;k x;k gSA 3- mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA 4- ÁkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa fjO;w ÁkFkZuk i= esa vafdr rF;ksa dks cgl ds nkSjku nksgjkrs gq;s crk;k fd jkT; ljdkj o ts-Mh-,- }kjk ÁLrqr ÁkFkZuk i= vne iSjoh esa [kkfjt gks x;s vkSj muds oktnk;jh dk dksbZ ÁkFkZuk i= ÁLrqr ugha fd;k x;kA fnukad 27-9-1986 dks tks oknh dk okn fMØh gks x;k Fkk mldks utj vUnkt dj vknsk ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA vius i{k ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus ,-vkbZ-vkj- 2000 ,l-lh- ist 1676 ,-vkbZ-vkj- 2005 ,l-lh- ist 592 vkj-vkj-Mh- 2005 ist 479 dh uthjsa isk dhA 5- jkT; ljdkj dh vksj ls mi jktdh; vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd ÁkFkhZ us fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd vius fjO;w ÁkFkZuk i= esa ,oa cgl esa tks rF; crk;s gS mu ij iwoZ ,dy ihB }kjk vius fu.kZ; esa foLrkjiwoZd viuk fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gSA ÁkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd bu fcUnqvksa dks fjO;w ÁkFkZuk i= ds ek/;e ls u;s fljs ls ugha mBk ldrsA ÁkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd iwoZ ,dy ihB ds fu.kZ; esa dksbZ ,jj visjsUV vku fjdkMZ ugha crk ik;s gSA vius dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1995 ,l-lh- 455] MCY;w-,y-lh- 2003 oksY;we 1 ,l-lh- ist 499 ,oa vkj-vkj-Vh- 2005 ist 545 dh uthjsa isk dhA 6- geusa ÁkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- ÁkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd }kjk vius fjO;w ÁkFkZuk i= esa ,oa cgl esa tks rF; crk;s gS mu ij iwoZ ,dy ihB }kjk vius fu.kZ; esa foLrkjiwoZd viuk fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gSA ÁkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd bu fcUnqvksa dks fjO;w ÁkFkZuk i= ds ek/;e ls u;s fljs ls ugha mBk ldrsA ÁkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd iwoZ ,dy ihB ds fu.kZ; esa dksbZ ,jj visjsUV vku fjdkMZ ugha crk ik;s gSA fjO;w Ádj.kksa ds lEcU/k esa ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1995 ,l-lh- 455 esa ;g fl)kUr Áfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd & Civil P.C. (5 of 1908) O. 45 R. 1 — Review — Error apparent on face of recorded — Means an error which strike one on mere looking at record and would not require any long drawn process of reasoning on points where there may conceivably be two opinions. MCY;w-,y-lh- 2003 oksY;we 1 ,l-lh- ist 499 esa Hkh iqu% bl ckr dks nksgjk;k x;k gS fd& Civil Procedure Code, O. 47 R. 1 — Scope — Hearing of review does not mean giving one more chance for rehearing matter already disposed of — High Court in hearing review as if it was rehearing whole petition overstepped its limits — Order of High Court set aside and original order restored. vkj-vkj-Vh- 2005 ist 545 esa ;g fl)kUr Áfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd& Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 47 Rule 1 — Review — Point that has been held and decided — View taken in the judgment may be erroneous but cannot be a ground for review. ÁkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd }kjk ÁLrqr uthjsa bl Ádj.k ds foks"k rF;ksa ds ifjÁs{; esa pLik ugha gksrh gSA 8- vr% mijksä of.kZr leLr rF;ksa dkuwuh Áko/kkuksa ,oa U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s ;g utjlkuh ÁkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gS ,oa jktLo e.My dh iwoZ ,dy ihB ds fu.kZ; fnukad 13-7-2000 dks ;Fkkor j[kk tkrk gSA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA