( 1 ) LIST has been revised. ( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the defendant-appellant are not present. Sri Sanjeev Kumar holding brief for Sri Shashi Nandan, learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent is present. A perusal of the orders dated 16-11-2005, 16-12-2005, 30-01-2006, 06-03-2006, 20-03-2006 and 03-04-2006 passed on the Order-Sheet show that the case has been repeatedly adjourned on account of the reasons mentioned in the respective orders passed on the said dates. Pursuant to the order dated 3-4-2006, the case is listed today. As noted above, even though the case has been taken up in the revised list today, still the learned counsel for the defendant-appellant are not present. ( 3 ) IN view of the above, there is no option but to dismiss the Second Appeal for want of prosecution. The Second Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. .