JUDGMENT 1. - Petitioner has been contributing towards the medical welfare scheme throughout his service tenure. He stood retired on 31.1.2001. After retirement, he is settled in his village. Since there have been no proper medical facilities in the nearby area, he opted for getting the medical relief to the tune of Rs. 100/- per month. 2. As the fate would have it, the petitioner had to undergo heart surgery in the SMS Hospital, Jaipur in June, 2004. Petitioner has been denied reimbursement of the bills only on the basis of his option already given for Rs. 100/- per month. 3. Serious observations have already been made by this court on the aim, objects and practicability of the scheme itself in case of Uma Shankar Srivastava v. State of Rajasthan & ors., SB Civil Writ Petition No. 5083/2003, D/d. 6.1.2006 : [2006(3) SLR 325 (Raj.)]. 4. By no stretch of imagination, it can be assumed and presumed that the member could get treatment of serious ailment for just Rs. 100/- per month. The benefit of giving medical aid of Rs. 100/- per month must be for routine medical treatment, however, in serious ailment, the technicalities should not and could not have been applied. The hyper-technical stand taken by the respondents is wholly unreasonable and unjustified. Even otherwise, under the scheme, the Board of Trustees had the discretion to allow reimbursement to the petitioner in the present case, but, as has been observed by this court in number of cases, the Board of Trustees are deciding the matters without any norms in highly arbitrary manner. Since the surgery had been conducted at SMS Hospital, Jaipur, the genuineness of the bills also cannot be disputed. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to reimburse entire amount as per the bills submitted by the petitioner within thirty days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order alongwith a cost of Rs. 10,000/- also.Petition allowed. *******