Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2006 DIGILAW 1892 (RAJ)
State of Rajasthan v. Mooliya
2006-05-25
M.S.KHAN
body2006
[kku] lnL;—;g jsQjsUl vfrfjä ftyk dysDVj t;iqj }kjk vius vknsk fnukad 6-3-2002 ds }kjk jktLo e.My vtesj dks ÁLrqr fd;k x;k gSA 2- la{ksi esa Ádj.k ds rF; bl Ádkj gS fd rglhynkj cLlh us v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa ÁkFkZuk i= ÁLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k fd ,dhdj.k [krkSuh tekcUnh lEor~ 2019 xzke Xokyuh rglhy cLlh esa [kljk uEcj 300@1 jdck 12 fcLok Hkwfe ekQh efUnj Jh ekrk th fojkteku nsg iqtkjh ijHkkrk iq= ?khL;k xksfoUnk iq= tqxyk dkSe yqgkj lkfdu Xokyuh fgLlk cjkcj dh [kkrsnkjh esa ntZ Fkh rFkk —"kd ds dkye esa dkuk iq= ekaX;k dkSe czkã.k lkfgu Xokyuh dk uke ntZ FkkA dkykUrj esa tekcUnh lEor~ 2023-26 cukrs le; ekQh efUnj dk uke foyksfir dj fn;k x;k vkSj [kkrsnkjh dkuk iq= ekaX;k dkSe czkã.k lkfgu Xokyuh ds uke ntZ dj nh xbZA [kkrsnkj dkuk ds QkSr gksus ij ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 121 fojklr ls dkuk ds ctk; ewY;k iq= ekaX;k ds uke ntZ dj nh xbZA ekaX;k ds }kjk Hkwfe dk cspku fd;s tkus ij tfj;s ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 289 ls Hkwfe gjlgk; iq= jkelgk; dkSe g- czkã.k lkfgu Xokyuh ds uke [kkrsnkjh Lohdkj gksdj orZeku tekcUnh lEor~ 2052-55 esa Hkwfe vÁkFkhZ ds uke ntZ gSA bl Ádkj Hkwfe dk tks gLrkUrj.k gqvk gS og xyr gSA vr% mä Áfof"V;ka foyksfir dh tkdj okil Hkwfe ekQh efUnj Jh ekrkth fojkteku nsg ds uke yxkbZ tkosA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us mHk; i{k dks lqudj fooknxzLr vkjkth iqu% efUnj ds uke ntZ djus gsrq ;g jsQjsUl e.My dks iszf"kr fd;k gSA 3- mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA 4- ÁkFkhZ jkT; ljdkj dh vksj ls mi jktdh; vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd fooknxzLr Hkwfe ewfrZ efUnj ,oa lkoZtfud mi;ksx dh Hkwfe gSA vr% mUgksaus bl Hkwfe dks iqu% ewfrZ efUnj ds uke ntZ djus dh ÁkFkZuk dhA vius i{k ds leFkZu esa vkj-vkj-Mh- 1994 ist 1 ,oa ttesaV VwMs ekpZ 2004 ,l-lh- ikVZ 1 esa Ádkfkr fu.kZ; i`Foh yky cuke~ cksMZ vkWQ jsosU;w ,.M vnlZ dh uthjsa isk dhA blds vfrfjä xSj dkuwuh vknsk dks dHkh Hkh fujLr fd;k tk ldrk gSA bl lEcU/k esa mUgksaus vkj-vkj-Mh- 1993 ist 411 ,oa vkj-vkj-Mh- 2002 ist 1 dh uthjsa isk dhA 5- vÁkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd mUgksaus fookfnr vkjkth dk tfj;s cSukek Ø; fd;k tkrk gS vkSj [kjhn dh fnukad ls vkt rd yxkrkj fookfnr vkjkth ij dkfct gSA mä Hkwfe ewfrZ efUnj dh [kkrsnkjh dh ugha jgh gSA jsQjsUl vR;f/kd foyEc ls ÁLrqr fd;k x;k gS tks pyus ;ksX; ugha gSA vius i{k ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkj-vkj-Vh- 2005 oks- 1 ist 479 vkj-ch-ts- 2003 ist 402 vkj-vkj-Vh- 2003 oks- 2 ist 769] vkj-vkj-Vh- 2006 ist 99 dh uthjsa isk dhA 6- geusa mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- vfrfjä ftyk dysDVj us vius jsQjsUl fu.kZ; esa ;g fu"d"kZ fudkyk gS fd i=koyh ij miyC/k ,dhdj.k [krkSuh tekcUnh lEor~ 2019 xzke Xokyuh rglhy cjlh ds voyksdu ls Li"V gksrk gS fd [kljk uEcj 300@1 jdck 12 fcLok Hkwfe ekQh efUnj Jh ekrkth fojkteku nsg iqtkjh ijHkkrk iq= ?khL;k] xksfoUnk iq= tqxyk dkSe yqgkj lkfgu Xokyuh fgLlk cjkcj dh [kkrsnkjh esa ntZ Fkh rFkk —"kd ds dkye esa dkuk iq= ekaX;k dkSe czkã.k lkfgu Xokyuh dk uke ntZ FkkA dkykUrj esa tekcUnh lEor~ 2023-26 cukrs le; ekQh efUnj dk uke foyksfir dj fn;k x;k vkSj [kkrsnkjh dkuk iq= ekaX;k dkSe czkã.k lkfgu Xokyuh ds uke ntZ dj nh xbZA [kkrsnkj dkuk ds QkSr gksus ij ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 121 fojklr ls dkuk ds ctk; ewY;k iq= ekaX;k ds uke ntZ dj nh xbZA ekaX;k ds }kjk Hkwfe dk cspku fd;s tkus ij tfj;s ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 289 ls Hkwfe gjlgk; iq= jkelgk; dkSe g- czkã.k lkfgu Xokyuh ds uke [kkrsnkjh Lohdkj gksdj orZeku tekcUnh lEor~ 2052-55 esa Hkwfe vÁkFkhZ ds uke ntZ gSA bl Ádkj Hkwfe dk tks gLrkUrj.k gqvk gS og xyr gS rFkk ÁkjEHk ls gh ÁHkko kwU; gSA efUnj ewfrZ ,d kkor ukckfyx gS] mldh Hkwfe ij fdlh O;fä ds dkr djus ls ;k iqtkjh gksus ls dksbZ LoRo ÁkIr ugha gksrs gSA ge vfrfjä ftyk dysDVj }kjk fudkys x;s fu"d"kksZ ls viuh lgefr O;ä djrs gS D;ksafd ewfrZ efUnj lrr~ vo;Ld gS ftldh Hkwfe dk gLrkUrj.k /kkjk 46 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e ds Áko/kkuksa ds foijhr gSA tSlk fd vkj-vkj-Mh- 1994 ist 1 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gSA jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds mä fu.kZ; dks ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us ttesaV VwMs ekpZ 2004 ,l-lh- ikVZ 1 esa Ádkfkr fu.kZ; i`Foh yky cuke~ cksMZ vkWQ jsosU;w ,.M vnlZ ds dsl esa vigsYM fd;k gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fuEu Ádkj ls gS& Having heard learned counsel for the parties on either side, we are satisfied that the common impugned order which is under challenge in these appeals, does not call for interference at the hands of this Court.
The High Court has elaborately considered the respective contentions looking to the facts and also the record as well as the position of law. In the view, it is unnecessary to us to support them again at we agree with the conclusions recorded by the High Court. vfHkHkk"kd vÁkFkhZ }kjk ÁLrqr uthjsa bl Ádj.k ds foks"k rF;ksa ds ifjÁs{; esa pLik ugha gksrh gSA tgka rd jsQjsUl vÁR;kfkr foyEc ls ÁLrqr fd;s tkus dk Áu gS] xSj dkuwuh vknsk dks dHkh Hkh fujLr fd;k tk ldrk gSA bl lEcU/k esa vkj-vkj-Mh- 1993 ist 411 esa ;g fl)kUr Áfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd& Limitation Act Section 3 — Entries regarding title changed by Asstt. Land Records Officer on the basis of application by opposite party though during settlement operations existing entries can be changed only in accordance with decree/judgment of competent Court, legal transfer deed or order of Court — Order, void ab initio and could be set aside at any time — No question of limitation involved — Order of Settlement Commissioner, setting aside impugned order cannot be assailed. bl lEcU/k esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; dh [k.M ihB us ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1994 ,l-lh- 1128] 1990¼1½ vkj-,y-vkj- 556] 2000¼2½ vkj-,y-vkj- 39] ¼1994½4 ,l-,l-lh- 575] ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1964 ,l-lh- 1536 esa Áfrikfnr fl)kUrksa dks Qksyks djrs gq;s vkj-vkj-Mh- 2002 ist 1 esa ;g fl)kUr Áfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& Raj. Land Revenue (Allotment of Land for Agricultural Purposes) Rules, 1970, Rule 14(4) — Cancellation of allotment — Allotment obtained by petitioner appellant by misrepresenting the fact that she was landless person whereas 43 bighas 5 biswas land already existing in favour of her husband-petitioner acquired khatedari rights after 10 years — Allotment cancelled by Collector after 30 years — Validity of — Held, allotment order being bad in eye of law being obtained by misrepresentation can be said to be ineffective — Conferment of khatedari right is only consequential which also cannot be maintained — Long lapse of time cannot be considered sufficient to save such allotment order obtained by misrepresenta-tion — Order of Collector not liable to be interfered with.
8- vr% mijksä rF;ksa] dkuwuh Áko/kkuksa ,oa U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s vfrfjä ftyk dysDVj t;iqj }kjk ÁLrqr ;g jsQjsUl Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk xzke Xokyuh rglhy cLrh esa fLFkr [kljk uEcj 300@1 jdck 12 fcLok Hkwfe ekQh efUnj Jh ekrkth fojkteku nsg ds uke ntZ djus ds vknsk fn;s tkrs gSA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA[ 2006 DIGILAW 1892 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]