Judgment ( 1 ) THE matter came before me on various occasions but no one appeared for the petitioners. Today also, no one appears for the petitioners. ( 2 ) THE petitioners have challenged the order dated 24. 2. 2005 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Jodhpur (for short, "the Family Court" hereinafter) in Criminal Original Case no. 109/1996 on an application filed by the petitioners under section 125 Cr. P. C. . whereby the application filed by the petitioners against non-petitioner No. 2 was allowed and the maintenance @ Rs. 1000. 00 each, totalling Rs. 2000. 00, was awarded in favour of the petitioners and against the non-petitioner No. 2. By the instant petition, the petitioners seek enhancement of maintenance. ( 3 ) I have carefully gone through the order impugned. A sum of Rs. 1000. 00 each in favour of petitioners No. 1 and 2 awarded by the Family Court appears to the just and proper. In the circumstances, therefore, I do not find any error, illegality or perversity in the order impugned. The revision petition is dismissed.