Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 1945 (RAJ)

RAMA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2006-05-29

H.R.PANWAR

body2006
Judgment ( 1 ) BY an application under Section 389 Cr. P. C. the applicant-appellant Rama Ram seeks temporary suspension of sentence on the ground that his wife is to undergo operation. He has placed on record the treatment record as also various prescriptions of Dharti Hospital, Tharad (Banas Kanta), Gujarat. ( 2 ) LEARNED public prosecutor submits that on humanitarian consideration, a reasonable period of 20 days would be just and proper for treating the wife of the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there being no other member except the applicant to take his wife to Gujarat and get her operated as the medical authorities have advised an urgent surgery. ( 3 ) HAVING regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I think it just and proper to temporarily suspend the sentence awarded to the accused appellant-applicant for a period of 20 days from the date of his release. ( 4 ) ACCORDINGLY, the bail application filed under Sec. 389 cr. P. C. is partly allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Jodhpur vide judgment dt. 20. 12. 2005 in sessions case No. 23/05 against applicant-appellant Rama Ram S/o Hukma Ram shall remain temporarily suspended for a period of twenty days from the date of his release and direct that the applicant appellant be released on bail provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his surrender before trial court on expiry of twenty days period from the date of his release and to undergo the sentence awarded.