Judgment ( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the nonbailable warrant issued against him and, therefore, submits that it may be converted into a bailable warrant. ( 2 ) FROM the perusal of the impugned order, it appears that in S. B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 181/2005, by the order dated 17-4-2006, it was directed that the petitioner be impleaded as an accused and be tried together with the accused already facing trial. In compliance of that order, a non-bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioner. ( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will appear before the trial Court on 10-6-2006 and move a regular bail application and till then, non-bailable warrant issued against him may not be executed. ( 4 ) IN view of the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the trial court on 10-6-2006. Till 10-6-2006, the non-bailable warrant against the petitioner shall not be executed. However, it is made clear that if petitioner fails to surrender before the trial Court on 10-6-2006, it will be open for the trial Court to secure the presence of the petitioner by non-bailable warrant. The criminal miscellaneous petition stands disposed of accordingly.