Jheky] lnL;&;g Lisky vihy jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼ftls la{ksi esa rRipkr~ ^vf/kfu;e 1956* kCn ls lakksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ dh /kkjk 10 ds vUrxZr jktLo e.My dh ,dyihB ds fu.kZ; fnukad 12-1-98 ¼fuxjkuh@dksyks@79@93@Jhxaxkuxj½ ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA ¼2½ la{ksi esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd fnukad 17-7-84 dks lgk;d vk;qDr mifuosku bZ-xk-u- ifj;kstuk] Nrjx<+ eq- chdkusj us e[kuflag o xQwj [kka ds e/; Mcy vYkksVesaV dk ekeyk ekurs gq, pd 8i ,e Mh ^,* ds eq-ua- 155@37 dk dqy 25 ch?kk dk vkoaVu xQwj [kkWa ds i{k esa bl vk/kkj ij fd;k fd mlus fdrsa tek dj nh gSa rFkk ml ij mldk dCtk gS o e[kuflag ds i{k esa fd;s x;s vkoaVu dks fujLr dj fn;kA mDr vknsk ls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZ e[kuflag us jktLFkku mifuosku ¼bafnjk xka/kh ugj ifj;kstuk {ks= esa Hkwfe dk foØ; ,oa vkoaVu½ fu;e] 1975 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa ^fu;e 1975* kCn ls lEcksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds fu;e 23 ds rgr~ vihy la[;k 197@92 vfrfjDr vk;qDr mifuosku] b-xk-u-i-] NRrjx<+ ds le{k izLrqr dh] ftls mUgksaus muds fu.kZ; fnukad 11-12-92 }kjk [kkfjt dj fn;kA mDr fu.kZ; fnukad 11-12-92 ds fo:) vihykFkhZa us fuxjkuh@dksyks@79@93@xaxkuxj jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa izLrqr dh] tks fu.kZ; fnukad 12-1-98 }kjk vLohdkj dj nh xbZA mDr fu.kZ; ds fo:) vihykFkhZa us ,l-ch- flfoy fjV fiVhku ua-525@98 }kjk vLohdkj dj nh xbZA mDr fu.kZ; ds fo:) vihykFkhZa us ,l-ch- flfoy fjV fiVhku ua- 525@98 e[kuflag cukr LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku o vU; isk dhA vizkFkhZx.k ds }kjk izkFkfed vkifRr us fjV fiVhku dh iks"k.kh; ds lEcU/k esa izkjfEHkd vkifRr dh] ftl ij vihykFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us fjV fiVhku okil ysus dk vuqjks/k fd;k rFkk ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;k] tks/kiqj us fnukad 19-1-1-99 dks fuEu vknsk ikfjr fd;k%& "Mr. Rajendra Mehta and Mr. Baboo Lal Dangi, learned counsel appearing for Respondents has reised preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition on the statutory special appeal lies against implugned order. In view of preliminary objection Mr. N.K. Goyal learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the petition and for permission to approach Appellate forum. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, if petitioner to approach Appellate forum. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, if petitioner prefersf and present memo of appeal within 30 days before the Appellate Authority. In view of preliminary objection Mr. N.K. Goyal learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the petition and for permission to approach Appellate forum. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, if petitioner to approach Appellate forum. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, if petitioner prefersf and present memo of appeal within 30 days before the Appellate Authority. The Appellate forum is requested to decide the case on merit without raising objection of limitation." ¼3½ vihykFkhZ us fnukad 29-11-99 dks ^vf/kfu;e 1956* dh /kkjk 10 ds vUrxZr Lisky vihy izLrqr dhA jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB us vihy dks Jo.kkFkZ fd;kA Lisky vihy ds yfEcr jgrs vihykFkhZa e[kuflag dh e`R;q gks xbZ o mlds okfjlku dks vknsk fnukad 29-11-2005 }kjk vfHkys[k ij fy;k x;kA ¼4½ i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dks lquk x;kA ¼5½ izR;FkhZ la- 1 ds fo}ku vf/koDRkk us izkjfEHkd vkifRr mBkrs gq, dgk fd vihykFkhZ dh Lisky vihy iks"k.kh; ugha gksus ds dkj.k fujLr dh tkosa D;ksafd ^vf/kfu;e 1956* dh /kkjk 77&ch ds rgr~ fuxjkuh ds fo:) vihy ckf/kr gS o Lisky vihy esa vihy Hkh lek;~r gSA ¼6½ vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us vius vknsk fnukad 19-11-99 esa jktLo e.My }kjk iwoZ esa fuxjkuh esa fn, x, fu.kZ; fnukad 12-1-98 ds fo:) statutory vihy iks"k.kh; ekuh gS o vihy dk xq.kkoxq.k ij fu.kZ; fd;k tkosa] ,sls funsZk fn, gSA vr% vihy dk xq.kkoxq.k ds vk/kkj ij fuLrkj.k fd;k tkosaA ,dyihB us vknsk fnukad 15-12-99 dks ekeyk vihy fd;s tkus ;ksX; ekuk gSA vf/kfu;e 1956 dh /kkjk 77 esa kCn ^vihy* gS fd u fd ^Lisky vihy*A ¼7½ fo}ku vfrfjDr jktdh; vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd vihykFkhZ us ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; esa fjV foMªk dj vihy isk djuk pkgk ftldh ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us Loh—fr ns nh ijUrq bldk dnkfi ;g vFkZ ugha yxk;k tk ldrk fd ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us vihy iks"k.kh; eku yhA vr% vihykFkhZx.k dh vihy fujLr dh tkosaA ¼8½ geusa i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k ds rdZ lqusa o ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; dk v/;;u fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA ¼9½ ^vf/kfu;e 1956* dh /kkjk 77¼[k½ bl izdkj gS%& ^^77 dfri; ekeyksa esa vihy ugha gksxh & ¼1½ ¼d½----- ¼[k½ iqujkoyksdu ;k iqujh{k.k ds fy, vkosnu i= dks vLohdkj djus dh vkKk ls] ;k** eLrkuk nw/k mRiknd lgdkjh lfefrg ikyh cuke cksMZ vkWQ jsosU;w Qksj jktLFkku] vtesj 1976 vkj-,y-MCY;w- 380 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; dh [k.MihB us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "Land Revenue Act Sec. 10 (before amendment in 1964) read with Sec. 77(b) - Where revision rejected by Single Member, no special appeal could lie before Division Bench - order of Division Bench set aside. Sec. 77(b) of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act specifically bars special a appeal against an order of rejection of a revision petition. The necessary infereence is that in case where revision petition under the provisions of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act is rejected no special appeal shall lie. The provisions of Sec. 77(b) are mandatory in character and contains no ambiguity. The learned Division Bench, therefore, seriously erred in law in admitting an appeal for hearing against the order of rejection of revision petition. As indicated above, such a special appeal was clearly barred by the provision of Sec. 77(b) of the Rajasthan and Revenue Act. It therefore, follows that the Division Bench acted without jurisdiction in entertaining and accepting an appeal against the order rejecting the revision petition as the learned Division Bench could not entertain the appeal. There was no occasion for the Division Bench to have decided matter on merits." ¼10½ geusa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds vknsk fnukad 19-11-99 dk voyksdu fd;kA ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us fjV ds xq.kkoxq.k ds lEcU/k esa dksbZ vknsk ikfjr ugha fd;k gSA vr% vihykFkhZx.k ds bl rdZ ls ge lger ugha gSa fd ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us vknsk fnukad 19-11-99 }kjk vknsk fnukad 12-1-98 ds fo:) statutory appeal lie djrh gS] ,slk eku fy;kA eLrkuk nw/k mRiknd lgdkjh lfefr ikyh ds fu.kZ; ds ifjizs{; esa izR;FkhZx.k dh izkjfEHkd vkifRr Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA vknsfkdk fnukad 15-12-99 ds voyksdu ls ;g izrhr gksrk gS fd vihykFkhZax.k ds vf/koDrk us ;g vfHkO;Dr fd;k fd Lisky vihy [k.MihB ds lquokbZ {ks= dh gSA muds bl fuosnu ij ,dyihB us vihy dks [k.MihB ds le{k izLrqr djus ds vknsk ikfjr dj fn;s] ftldk dnkfi ;g vFkZ ugha yxk;k tk ldrk fd ,dyihB us ;g ?kks"k.kk dj nh fd izuxr ekeyk vihy fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA ¼11½ mijksDr ds ifjizs{; esa vihykFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr Lisky vihy iks"k.kh; ugha gksus ds dkj.k fujLr dh tkrh gSA ¼12½ fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA