Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 2063 (RAJ)

Avtar Singh v. Didarsingh

2006-06-19

A.K.PUROHIT

body2006
iqjksfgr] lnL;—;g fuxjkuh /kkjk 230 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e*½ ds varxZr rglhynkj ¼Hkw-vfHkys[k½] ?kMlkuk ds vknsk fnukad 19-12-2005 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gSa fd ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 39 j?kqohjflag oYn m?keflag ds [kkrsnkjh dh vkjkth pd uacj 4 ,-,u-Mh-ch- rglhy ?kM+lkuk ftyk Jhxaxkuxj ds laca/k esa gYdk iVokjh }kjk nhnkjflag vizkFkhZ uacj 1 ds gd esa ukekUrjdj.k xksnukesa ds vk/kkj ij [kkrsnkj j?kqohjflag dk LoxZokl gksus ds ckn Hkj dj rglhynkj] ?kM+lkuk ds le{k izLrqr fd;kA bl ij rglhynkj] ?kM+lkuk us fnukad 23-7-1999 dks ;g vknsk ikfjr fd;k fd xksnukesa dk ukekUrjdj.k dh lquokbZ ds ipkr~ fu.kZ; fd;k tkuk gSA vr% ckn lquokbZ fu.kZ;kuqlkj vadu fd;k tkuk gS blfy;s ;g ukekUrjdj.k vLohdkj gSA orZeku izkFkhZ vorkjflag us ,d fu;fer jktLo okn fnukad 10-10-2005 dks miftyk/khk] ?kM+lkuk ds U;k;ky; esa *vf/kfu;e^ dh /kkjk 88] 188 ,oa 153 ds rgr orZeku vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) izLrqr fd;k ftlesa dFku fd;k x;k fd j?kqohjflag] foØeflag] vrjflag] vthrflag pkj HkkbZ Fks ftuesa ls vrjflag ds vykok vU; foØeflag yk-vkSykn rFkk j?kqohjflag vkSj vthrflag vfookfgr gksus ds dkj.k vrjflag ds iq=@iqf=;ka gh fgUnw fof/k ds vuqlkj tk;t okfjlku gS rFkk lkFk gh ;g Hkh fuosnu fd;k fd j?kqohjflag ds dksbZ vkSykn ugha gksus ds dkj.k oknh o izfroknh Lo:iflag] djusyflag] nhnkjflag] vorkjflag] bdckyflag] ljnhiflag] dqynhidksj] egsUnzdksj dk oknxzLr vkjkth esa 1@8 fgLlk fufgr gS vkSj e`rd Lo:iflag ds okfjlku dk 8@5 fgLlk rFkk e`rd ljnhiflag ds okfjlku dk 8oka fgLlk fufgr gS ftuds gdksa dh ?kks"k.kk dh tkosA blds ckn vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 nhnkjflag us rglhynkj] ?kM+lkuk ds le{k ,d izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k ftlesa xksnukesa ds vk/kkj ij ukekUrjdj.k Loh—r djus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA izkFkhZ dks uksfVl izkIr gksus ij izkFkhZ us rglhynkj ¼jktLo½ ?kM+lkuk ds le{k fnukad 23-12-2005 dks ,d izkFkZuk i= /kkjk 11 lh-ih-lh- lifBr /kkjk 151 ds rgr izLrqr dj dFku fd;k fd mä izkFkZuk i= esa nhnkjflag us U;k;ky; esa ikfjr vknsk fnukad 29-10-2005 dks xksnukesa ds vk/kkj ij bardky ntZ djokus dh izkFkZuk dh gS rFkk fnukad 10-10-2005 dks izkFkhZ }kjk mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] ?kM+lkuk ds le{k ,d okn *vf/kfu;e^ dh /kkjk 88] 188 vkSj 153 ds rgr izLrqr djus ds ipkr~ vizkFkhZ nhnkjflag ds mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] ?kM+lkuk ds le{k fnukad 21-10-2005 dks mifLFkr gksus ds ipkr~ isk fd;k gS tcfd blls iwoZ 23-7-1999 dks bardky fujLr fd;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZ }kjk rglhynkj] ?kM+lkuk ds le{k ,d vU; izkFkZuk i= /kkjk 10 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k x;k fd blh fo"k; ij tc ,d nkok miftyk dysDVj] ?kM+lkuk ds le{k *vorkjflag cuke~ nhnkjflag^ tSjdkj gS ftlesa rglhynkj Lo;a i{kdkj gS rFkk izkFkZuk i= o nkos dh fo"k; oLrq ,d gh gS] i{kdkj Hkh leku gSa] vr% lh-ih-lh- dh /kkjk 10 ds rgr okn ds fu.kZ; rd dk;Zokgh LFkfxr j[kh tkosA izkFkhZ ds bl izkFkZuk i= ij rglhynkj] ?kM+lkuk us fnukad 23-12-2005 dks izkFkhZ dk izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 11 lifBr /kkjk 151 rFkk nwljk izkFkZuk i= /kkjk 10 lh-ih-lh- dks vLohdkj dj fn;k ftlds fo:) izkFkhZ us ;g fuxjkuh izLrqr dh gSA 3- fuxjkuh ij cgl izkjaHk djrs gq, orZeku jsLiksaMs.V@vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us izkjfEHkd vkifÙk izLrqr dh fd ;g fuxjkuh ikS"k.kh; ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izLrqr izdj.k esa izkFkhZ }kjk vuko;d :i ls 13 O;fä;ksa dks vizkFkhZ cuk fn;k x;k gS blfy;s misjoinder of parties ds vk/kkj ij Hkh ;g fuxjkuh [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA ;g izkjfEHkd vkifÙk Hkh dh xbZ fd fnukad 13-12-2005 dk vknsk rglhynkj us izkFkhZ ds nks izkFkZuk i= Øek% izFke /kkjk 10 lh-ih-lh- rFkk nwljk lh-ih-lh- ds izkFkZuk i= dks vLohdkj fd;k gS] blfy;s nks fuxjkfu;ka izLrqr dh tkuh pkfg;s Fkha tcfd ,d gh fuxjkuh izLrqr dh xbZ gS] bl vk/kkj ij Hkh ;g fuxjkuh [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA 4- izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dh izkjfEHkd vkifÙk;ksa dk tokc nsrs gq, dFku fd;k fd fnukad 23-12-2005 dk rglhynkj dk vknsk *dkseu^ vksMZj gS ftlds }kjk mlds nksuksa izkFkZuk i=ksa dks vLohdkj fd;k x;k gS blfy;s muds }kjk izLrqr dh xbZ ,d gh fjohtu oS/kkfud gSA izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us ;g Hkh dFku fd;k gS fd tks fu;fer okn mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ds ;gka ij yafcr gSa muesa tks Hkh i{kdkj cuk;s x;s gSa mu lHkh dks bl fuxjkuh esa i{kdkj cuk;k x;k gS] blfy;s izdj.k esa misjoinder of parties ugha fd;k x;k gSA 5- geusa loZizFke vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dh izkjafHkd vkifÙk;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA ;g lgh gS fd ukekUrjdj.k dh dk;Zokgh esa jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 ds rgr fuxjkuh izLrqr dh tkuh pkfg;s Fkh ysfdu bl izdj.k esa jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 dh /kkjk 230 dk vadu dj fuxjkuh izLrqr dh xbZ gS ysfdu dsoy ek= /kkjkvksa ,oa *vf/kfu;e^ ds xyr vadu ds vk/kkj ij bl fuxjkuh dks bl vkifÙk ij [kkfjt fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr ugha gSA tgka rd misjoinder of parties dk izu gS] ;g rF; izdV gq, gSa fd blh fookfnr vkjkth ds laca/k esa yafcr fu;fer okn esa tks Hkh i{kdkj Fks mu lcdks bl fuxjkuh esa i{kdkj cuk;k x;k gS] blfy;s ;g fuxjkuh misjoinder of parties ds vk/kkj ij Hkh [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA fnukad 23-12-2005 ds vknsk ls orZeku izkFkhZ ds nksuksa izkFkZuk i=ksa dks [kkfjt fd;k x;k ftuds fo:) ,d fuxjkuh izLrqr dh xbZ gSA ge vizkFkhZ dh bl izkjfEHkd vkifÙk ls lger ugha gSa fd bl vknsk ds fo:) dsoy ,d fuxjkuh izLrqr dj fn;s tkus ek= ls gh fuxjkuh [kkfjt dh tkosA 6- xq.kkxq.k ij cgl djrs gq, izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us rdZ izLrqr fd;k gS fd rglhynkj] ?kM+lkuk us fnukad 23-12-2005 dk vknsk ikfjr djrs le; vius {ks=kf/kdkj dk nq#i;ksx fd;k gS vkSj tc ,d ckj fnukad 23-7-1999 dks rglhynkj] ?kM+lkuk esa ukekUrjdj.k vLohdkj dj fn;k rks blds ipkr~ iqu% ukekUrjdj.k dh dk;Zokgh djus dk mUgsa dksbZ {ks=kf/kdkj ugha Fkk rFkk ,slk djus ls /kkjk 11 lh-ih-lh- esa fn;s x;s izko/kkuksa dh Li"V vogsyuk dh xbZ gSA blh izdkj tc oknxzLr vkjkth ds ckcr~ fu;fer okn yafcr gS rks ukekUrjdj.k dh dk;Zokgh dks /kkjk 10 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr LFkfxr fd;k tkuk pkfg;s Fkk ysfdu rglhynkj us izkFkhZ ds nksuksa gh izkFkZuk i=ksa dks [kkfjt djus esa voS/kkfudrk dh gSA 7- vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk rdZ gS fd rglhynkj] ?kM+lkuk }kjk fnukad 23-7-1999 dks ukekUrjdj.k bl vk/kkj ij fujLr fd;k Fkk fd xksnukesa ds vk/kkj ij ukekUrjdj.k dh lquokbZ ds ipkr~ fu.kZ; fd;k tkuk gSA vr% ckn lquokbZ fu.kZ;kuqlkj vadu fd;k tkuk gS blfy;s ;g ukekUrjdj.k vLohdkj gSA bl izdkj rglhynkj us mä vknsk fnukad 23-7-1999 esa xksnukesa ds vk/kkj ij ukekUrjdj.k Hkjus dh dk;Zokgh dks ckn lquokbZ LFkfxr djrs gq, ukekUrjdj.k Hkjus dh dk;Zokgh dks ckn lquokbZ LFkfxr djrs gq, ukekUrjdj.k fujLr fd;k gSA vc rglhynkj xksnukesa ds vk/kkj ij lquokbZ dj ukekUrjdj.k dh dk;Zokgh djrs gSa rks iwoZ ds vknsk fnukad 23-7-1999 ds vk/kkj ij ;g dk;Zokgh res judicata dh ifjf/k esa ugha vkrh gSA blh izdkj mudk rdZ gS fd fu;fer okn esa ukekUrjdj.k dks jksds tkus dk dksbZ vknsk U;k;ky; }kjk ugha fn;k x;k gS vkSj blds vykok Hkh ukekUrjdj.k dh dk;Zokgh lu~ 1999 ls gh yafcr gS tcfd ;g okn mlds ipkr~ isk fd;k x;k gS blfy;s ukekUrjdj.k dh dk;Zokgh okn ds nk;j dj fn;s tkus ek= ls gh LFkfxr ugha dh tk ldrh gS vkSj rglhynkj us bu leLr igyqvksa ij fopkj dj fn- 23-12-2005 dks tks vknsk ikfjr fd;k gS] og fof/k lEer vknsk gSA 8- geusa nksuksa i{kdkjksa }kjk izLrqr uthjksa dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa cgl ij euu fd;kA 9- izLrqr izdj.k esa [kkrsnkj j?kqohjflag dh e`R;q ij ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 39 j?kqohjflag }kjk orZeku vizkFkhZ nhnkjflag ds gd esa rlnhd djus gsrq rglhynkj] ?kM+lkuk ds le{k izLrqr fd;k x;k ftlesa rglhynkj us fnukad 23-7-1999 ds vknsk ls ;g vafdr djrs gq, mä ukekUrjdj.k dks rlnhd djus ls bUdkj fd;k fd xksnukesa dk ukekUrjdj.k dks rlnhd djus ls bUdkj fd;k fd xksnukesa dk ukekUrjdj.k lquokbZ ds ipkr~ gh fuf.kZr fd;k tk ldrk gSA bl dk;Zokgh ds ipkr~ ,d jktLo okn miftyk dysDVj] ?kM+lkuk ds U;k;ky; esa *vf/kfu;e^ dh /kkjk 88] 188 ,oa 153 ds rgr orZeku izkFkhZ us vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) nk;j fd;k tks fopkjk/khu gSA blds ipkr~ rglhynkj] ?kM+lkuk us vius iwoZ ds vknsk fnukad 23-7-1999 esa xksnukesa ds vk/kkj ij ukekUrjdj.k dh dk;Zokgh orZeku vizkFkhZ ds izkFkZuk i= ij kq: dh vkSj xksnukesa ds lEcU/k esa orZeku izkFkhZ ,oa vizkFkhZ dh lquokbZ vkjEHk dhA bl lquokbZ dks jksdus gsrq orZeku izkFkhZ us lh-ih-lh- ds lsDku 10 ,oa bldh lquokbZ gh u gks ldus dks ysdj /kkjk 11 lh-ih-lh- ds izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;s ftu ij fuxjk/khu vknsk ikfjr dj mä izkFkZuk i=ksa dks [kkfjt fd;k gSA tgka rd lh-ih-lh- dh /kkjk 11 ds izkFkZuk i= ds lEcU/k esa rglhynkj dk iwoZ vknsk fnukad 23-7-1999 ij rglhynkj dks tkap djus ls jksdus ds fy;s jslT;wfMdsVk dh ifjf/k esa ugha vkrkA bl laca/k esa lh-ih-lh- dh /kkjk 11 esa tks izko/kku fn;k x;k gS] og bl izdkj gS % Section 11 C.P.C. : Res judicata — No Court shall try any suit or issue in which the matter directly and substantially in issue has been directly and substantially in issue in a former suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim, litigating under the same title, in a Court competent to try such subsequent suit or the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised, and has been heard and finally decided by such court. Explanation I : The expression "former suit" shall denote a suit which has been decided prior to the suit in question whether or not it was instituted prior thereto. Explanation II : For the purpose of this section, the competence of a Court shall be determined irrespective of any provisions as to a right of appeal from the decision of such court. Explanation III : The matter above referred to must in the former suit have been alleged by one party and either denied or admitted, expressly or impliedly, by the other. Explanation IV : Any matter which might and ought to have been made ground of defence or attack in such former suit shall be deemed to have been a matter directly and substantially in issue in such suit. Explanation VI : Where persons litigate bona fide in respect of a public right or of a private right claimed in common for themselves and others, all persons interested in such right shall, for the purpose of this section, be deemed to claim under the persons so litigating. Explanation VII : The provisions of this section shall apply to a proceeding for the execution of a decree and references in this section to any suit, issue or former suit shall be contrued as references, respectively, to a proceeding for the execution of the decree, question arising in such proceeding and a former proceeding for the execution of that decree. Explanation VIII : An issue heard and finally decided by a Court of limited jurisdiction, competent to decide such issue, shall operate as res judicata in a subsequent suit, notwithstanding that such Court of limited jurisdiction was not competent to try such subsequent suit or the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised." 10- bl /kkjk ds rgr ;fn iwoZ esa fdlh fcanq ij fdlh okn esa dksbZ fcUnq ftl ij iwoZ ds okn esa nksuksa i{kdkjksa ds e/; lh/ks rkSj ij ;k ijks{k :i ls vafre :i ls fuf.kZr gks x;k gks] rks u;s okn esa iwoZ ds okn ds mä fcUnq ij fu.kZ; jslT;wfMdsVk ds fl)kar ij iqu% fopkj.kh; ugha jgrk ysfdu izFke rks bl izdj.k esa ;g ukekUrjdj.k dh izfØ;k gS u fd okn rFkk ;fn jslT;wfMdsVk ds fl)kUr dks ykxw fd;k tkos rks Hkh rglhynkj xksnukesa ds vk/kkj ij ukekUrjdj.k ds izu dks yafcr j[kk x;k gSA rglhynkj us vius vknsk fnukad 23-7-1999 esa mä xksnukesa ds izu dks vafre :i ls fuf.kZr ugha fd;kA tgka rd lh-ih-lh- dh /kkjk 10 ds izkFkZuk i= ij rglhynkj }kjk mls [kkfjt djus dk izu gS] fu;fer okn esa ukekUrjdj.k dh dk;Zokgh dks jksdus dk dksbZ vknsk ugha gksuk rglhynkj us vius vknsk esa vafdr fd;k gSA 11- fof/k dk ;g lqLFkkfir fl)kUr gS fd ukekUrjdj.k dh dk;Zokgh Fiscal Proceedings gSA blls i{kdkjksa ds vf/kdkj r; ugha gksrs] os rks fu;fer okn esa gh r; gksrs gSa vkSj E;wVsku ds lEcU/k esa rglhynkj jktLFkku yS.M jsosU;w ,DV ds rgr dk;Zokgh djus dks l{ke gS] foks"k :i ls tc ;g okn izkFkhZ us ukekUrjdj.k dh dk;Zokgh dks rglhynkj }kjk ikfjr vknsk fnukad 23-7-1999 ls vkjaHk djus ds ipkr~ okn fnukad 10-6-2005 dks izLrqr fd;k gS ftls rglhynkj us /kkjk 10 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr LFkfxr djus ls bUdkj fd;k gSA 12- geus bl izdj.k esa lh-ih-lh- dh /kkjk 10 ,oa /kkjk 11 esa fd;s x;s izko/kkuksa ds ifjizs{; esa bl izdj.k ds rF;ksa dk voyksdu ,oa v/;;u fd;kA gekjs }kjk bl laca/k esa fofHkUu fofup;ksa esa fof/k ds mijksä izko/kkuksa ds laca/k esa tks O;oLFkk nh xbZ gS mldk Hkh v/;;u fd;kA bl laca/k esa U;k;ky;ksa }kjk nh xbZ O;oLFkk bl izdkj gS% (i) jktLo e.My ds fofup; ¼vkj-vkj-Vh- 2004¼1½ ist 89 **egkohjizlkn@ uUnyky^^ esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr fuEu izdkj gS& "Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 - Sec. 84 - Revision - Mutation - Addl. Divisional Commissioner ordered to stay the mutation proceedings till the disposal of regular suit - Rights cannot be decided by mutation - Held, order is justified and confirmed." 2. RRT 2004(1) Page 454 "Mohari Beba (Smt.) vs. Nand Lal & Anr." "Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 - Sec. 84 - Revision - Mutation - Addl. Divisional Commissioner ordered to defer the mutation proceedings till the decision of regular suit pending between the parties - Order justified and upheld." 3. R.B.J. (13) 2006 Page 133 "Birji Bai vs. Pradeep Kumar " "Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 - Section 135 - It is not open for the revenue court to examine the validity of a Will in mutation proceedings - It is not open for the revenue court to examine the validity of a Will. The scope before the revenue court is very limited. It is only supposed to examine whether the Will was made or not and oly a preliminary scrutiny can be made to understand the Will property. Further, it is also correct that mutation are fiscal proceedings and any right/title of aperson can be decided in a declaratory suit. Revision accepted." (ii) ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ,l-ch- flfoy fjV fifVku uacj 1033 ls 1036 vkWQ 2002 vuqokuh **tsBwflag cuke~ Hkaojflag o vU;^^ esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr bl izdkj gS% "Rajasthan Land Revenue (Land Records) Rules, 1957 Rule 119 - Fiscal entries like mutation, do not create any title or interest in the property - Issue of succession either by Wil or adoption cannot be settled in mutation proceedings. The fiscal entries like mutation do not represent or create any title or interest in the property not the complicated issue of succession, either by way of Will or adoption can be settled in mutation proceedings and the parties have to approach the appropriate forum for adjudication of title. The fiscal entries like mutation do not represent or create any title or interest in the property not the complicated issue of succession, either by way of Will or adoption can be settled in mutation proceedings and the parties have to approach the appropriate forum for adjudication of title. Writ petition dismissed." (iii) fofup; vkj-vkj-Mh- 1999 ist 514 **,y-vklZ vkWQ Jherh pUnzkoyh@ Hkaojflag^^ ds izdj.k esa jktLo e.My dh ,dyihB }kjk izfrikfnr fl)kUr bl izdkj gS % "(C) Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, Section 135 - Revision filed against the order of the R.A.A. remanding the case - Held, question of adoption and Will is involved in the instant case - Matter is pending in competent court - The proceedings of mutation order to be kept pending till decision - Order of R.A.A., set aside - Decision of Collector, held justified." (iv) fofup; vkj-vkj-Vh- 2003¼1½ ist 650 **tsBwflag cuke~ Hkaojflag^^ }kjk izLrqr ,l-ch- flfoy fjV fifVku uacj 1033 ls 1336 vkWQ 2001 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr fl)kUr bl izdkj gS% "Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 - Sec. 135 - Mutation proceeding - Fiscal entries like mutation does not represent or create any title or interest in the property, nor the complicated issue of succession, either by way of will or adoption can be settled in mutation proceedings and the parties have to approach the appropriate forum for adjudication of title." (v) fofup; vkj-vkj-Vh- 2002¼1½ ist 77 **kkfUryky cuke~ cksMZ vkWQ jsosU;w o vU;^^ esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr fl)kUr bl izdkj gS% "Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 - Sec. 113 - Mutation - Once the dispute about the right to succession was raised at the time of mutation, it was not open to revenue authorities to adjudicate upon the right to succession but the matter should have been referred to the civil court." (vi) fofup; 2003¼2½ Mh-,u-ts- ¼,l-lh-½ ist 345 iSjk uacj 6 o 9 **efgyk ctjaxh tfj;s okfjlku cuke~ cnzhckbZ^^ ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr fl)kUr bl izdkj gS % "Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Sec. 11, Explanation VIII - M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sec. 44, 110(4) and 111 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Secs. 32 and 33 - Suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession of property - Maintainability of - Belated plea of res-judicata raised before Supreme Court - Appellant-plaintiff claiming (as daughter of GE who was married to one GO) recovery of possession from respondent who was adopted by GO - Contention that in earlier mutation proceedings claim of GO and plaintiff were allowed and claim of respondent was rejected - Held, Belated plea of res-judicata is lible to be rejected - Further, on merit also the plea is not sustainable as the Mutation proceeding before revenue authority is not a judicial proceeding and does not decide question of title of immovable property - High Court rightly dismissed suit." (vii) fofup; 1996 vkj-vkj-Mh- ist 120 iSjk 6 **izHkkor o vU; cuke~ dtksM o vU;^^ ds izdj.k esa jktLo e.My }kjk izfrikfnr fl)kUr bl izdkj gS % "Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10 - Raj. Tenancy Act, Sec. 183B - Parties in the present application and in the former suit are different and the point of issue is not directly the same - Moreover, provisions of Sec. 183B, are for the benefit of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe and the application u/S. 183B is to be disposed of summarily - Therefore, the present proceedings cannot be stayed. (Paras 6, 7)" (viii) fofup; 1995 vkj-vkj-Mh- ist 582 ¼Mh-ch-½ iSjk 7 **Hkwjk cuke~ ukuwjke o vU;^^ ds izdj.k esa jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB }kjk izfrikfnr fl)kUr bl izdkj gS % "(A) Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10 - Suit cannot be stayed when cause of action in both the suits is different. (Para 7)" (ix) fofup; 1995 vkj-vkj-Mh- ist 538 iSjk uacj 7 o 9 **mejko cuke~ jkepUnz o vU;^^ ds izdj.k esa jktLo e.My dh ,dyihB }kjk izfrikfnr fl)kUr bl izdkj gS % "Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10 - In a suit for declaration and temporary injunction, an application u/S. 10 and 151, C.P.C. was filed to stay the suit - Held, prima facie, the cause of action and relief claimed are different in both the cases - Proceedings in the Revenue Court cannot be stayed on account of suit pending in the civil court - Defendants are bound down by way of T.I. - Revenue Court has rightly rejected the application. (Para 7, 9)" (x) fofup; 1993 vkj-vkj-Mh- ist 812 iSjk 4 **vkSadkj o vU; cuke~ Jherh dqlqeyrk o vU;^^ ds izdj.k esa jktLo e.My dh ,dyihB }kjk izfrikfnr fl)kUr bl izdkj gS % "Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10 - Suit u/S. R.T. Act for permanent injunction - Prima facie revenue court has to see whether the right of the plaintiff/tenant to enjoyment of the whole or part of the holding is invaded or threatened to be invaded by his land holder or any other person - Cause of action and relief to be awarded is entirely different from that in a suit in the civil court for cancellation of sale deed - Proceedings in revenue court cannot be stayed on account of the suit pending in civil court." (xi) fofup; 1999¼1½ Mh-,u-ts- ist 262 iSjk 4 o 7 **jkefdkksj cuke~ inepUn^^ ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr fl)kUr bl izdkj gS % "(A) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Secs. 10, 151 and 115 - Stay of the suit petitioners filed a suit for protection of their possession and forcible ejectment - Subsequently, the landlord also filed a suit for eviction on the ground default in payment of rent - Application for stay of proceedings in the subsequent suit rejected - Matter in issue in both the suit is substantially different - Held, No jurisdictional error or illegality committed by trial Court." (xii) fofup; ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1995 ¼xqtjkr½ ,u-vks-lh- ist 220 **xqtjkr LVsV vkj-Vh-lh- Hkkouxj cuke~ foeykcsu ,y-kkg^^ ds izdj.k esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr bl izdkj gS % "(B) Civil P.C. (5 of 1908), Section 10 - Stay of subsequent proceedings - Section referable only to a suit in Civil Court cannot apply to any other proceedings under any statute - Eviction suit in Civil Court barred by special statute - Subsequent proceeding by competent authority under special statute cannot be stayed by Civil Court." (xiii) fofup; ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1994 ¼iatkc o gfj;k.kk½ ,u-vks-lh- ist 46 **lqjsUnzflag cuke~ rstkflag ekulkbZ;k^^ ds izdj.k esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr bl izdkj gS % "Civil P.C. (5 of 1908) S. 10 - Stay of suit - Requisites - Suit for partition and possession of half share in suit property - Application for stay under section 10 on ground that same issue pending consideration in a suit in other High Court - Plaintiff not getting possession over a decade even after establishing their rights through apex Court - Matter in issue in other suit apparently not same - Suit does not deserved to be stayed in law or equity." 13- fof/k ds izko/kku ,oa mijksä uthjksa dks /;ku esa j[kdj izLrqr izdj.k ds rF;ksa ij xkSj fd;s tkus ls ;g ik;k tkrk gS fd rglhynkj us E;wVsku dh dk;Zokgh esa fnukad 23-7-1999 dks tks vknsk ikfjr fd;k gS og vafre vknsk ugha gS cfYd mä vknsk esa ;g Li"V fd;k x;k fd xksnukes ds izu ij lquokbZ ds ckn fu.kZ; djus dk Li"V vadu fd;k x;k gS vkSj rglhynkj ds vknsk dks vafre vknsk ekudj jslT;wMhdsVk ds fl)kUr dks ykxw djuk bl izdj.k esa drbZ oS/kkfud ugha gksxk vkSj rglhynkj us fuxjk/khu vknsk esa jslT;wMhdsVk dk fl)kUr ykxw ugha gksus ds laca/k esa dksbZ voS/kkfudrk ugha gSA 14- mijksä foospu ds ifj.kkeLo:i ;g fuxjkuh vLohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa rglhynkj] ?kM+lkuk }kjk ikfjr vknsk fnukad 23-7-1999 ;Fkkor~ j[kk tkrk gS lkFk gh ;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd rglhynkj }kjk ukekUrjdj.k ds lEcU/k esa ikfjr dksbZ Hkh vknsk fu;fer okn esa ikfjr gksus okys vknsk@fu.kZ; ds v/khu jgsxk rFkk mä okn dk fu.kZ; gksus rd dksbZ Hkh i{kdkj E;wVsku ds bUnzkt vFkok jktLo fjdkMZ ds bUnzktkr ds vk/kkj ij Hkwfe dk cspku] csad esa jgu bR;kfn vFkok fdlh izdkj ls vUrj.k ugha djsxkA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA