JUDGMENT 1. - This appeal is directed against the order by which the learned Single Judge declined to grant interim relief and thus rejected the stay application. 2. It is said that interim order had been passed earlier on 8.6.2005 directing the respondents to consider the candidature of the appellant in the OBC category and if she is otherwise found eligible, consider her for appointment on the post of Teacher Gr. III in that category. 3. The dispute is whether the appellant can be considered in the OBC category. It appears from the submission of the counsel that the appellant was a resident of State of Haryana but married in State of Rajasthan. She belongs to a community which is recognised as OBC in the State of Rajasthan but not in State of Haryana. Dispute arose as to whether on the basis of caste certificate/educational certificates obtained in the State of Haryana, she can claim OBC status. We are of the view that the question as to whether on marriage the appellant can be treated as an OBC, in the facts and circumstances of the case, is an issue which is to be decided by judgment at the final hearing, and as such, no interim relief could be granted by an interim order. In the circumstances, the impugned order of the learned Single Judge dated 17.4.2006 by which he virtually vacated the earlier order dated 8.6.2005 cannot be said to be erroneous. 4. Counsel submitted that if the Court is not inclined to pass interim relief, one post may be kept reserved for her so that in the event of success she may be appointed on such post. 5. It is not possible to pass such an order as it would not be in the interest of the candidates at large or the department, that is, in public interest. All that we would like to observe that in the event of success, respondents would consider the case of the appellant for appointment on the post of Teacher, Gr. III any available post.With the above observation, the appeal is disposed of.Appeal disposed of as above - Order of single judge sustained. *******