Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 2443 (RAJ)

GUARA DEVI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2006-08-10

JITENDRA RAY GOYAL

body2006
Judgment JITENDRA RAY GOYAL, J. ( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for accused petitioner as well as complainant, learned public prosecutor for the State, perused the case diary and other material produced during the course of arguments. ( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for accused petitioner contended that Sunita Devi has been given the benefit of pre-arrest bail by the Additional Sessions Judge, Behror, camp Bansoor (Alwar ) and the case of the present accused petitioner Smt. Guara devi is at par with her. It is also submitted that no grievous injury on any vital part of the injured has been alleged to have been inflicted by the present accused petitioner and at the most it is a case of 452 and325 ipc. It is further submitted that the accused petitioner is a woman having small children. ( 3 ) LEARNED public prosecutor and counsel appearing for the complainant opposed the bail application. ( 4 ) WITHOUT making any observations on merits, having considered the rival submissions made at the bar, nature of accusation, material on record and all other facts and circumstances, I deem it proper to give the benefit of the pre-arrest bail to accused petitioner Smt. Guara Devi. ( 5 ) IN the result, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Smt. Guara devi W/o Malla Ram, she shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/investigating officer in FIR No. 209/2006 registered at Police Station Bansoor, District Alwar provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- together with two sureties each in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- to his satisfaction on the following conditions:-1. that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. 2. that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer: and 3. that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. Bail Application allowed