Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 2535 (RAJ)

Kalawati v. Raja Ram

2006-08-22

A.C.BHATT, KAMAL NAYAN SHRIMAL

body2006
Jheky] lnL;-&;g f}rh; vihy vUrxZr /kkjk 224 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 19 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dgk tkosxk½ fo:) fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] Hkjriqj fnukad 7-12-2001 ds izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- vihykFkhZ ¼izkFkhZ-½ eq- dykorh ds vuqlkj izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd vihykFkhZ ds firk dqUnu Fks] ftlds vihykFkhZ ,oa nks iq= uRFkh o tloar gq,] bl dkj.k vihykFkhZ tks dqUnu dh iq=h gS] mldk dqUnu dh lEifr esa cjkcj dk fgLlk gS ysfdu bl rF; dks Nqikrs gq, izR;FkhZ la- 1 ls 4 ¼jktkjke] uoyflag] Hkxokuflag] eksguflag½ us ,d okn vUrxZr /kkjk 88] 188 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e ds rgr ks"k izR;FkhZx.k ds fo:) ;g dgrs gq, isk fd;k fd dqUnu ds flQZ nks iq= uRFkh o tloar Fks] ftuesa tloar cM+k Fkk] ftUgksaus jktLo deZpkfj;ksa ls lkt djds dqUnu dh QkSrxh ds ipkr~ lEiw.kZ vkjkth [kljk ua- 117 lkfcd jdck 17 ch?kk 2 fcLok ftldk cankscLr }kjk gky [kljk ua- 236 jdck 3 ch?kk 15 fcLok] 237 jdck 3 ch?kk 14 fcLok] 238 jdck 6 ch?kk 12 fcLok] 239 jdck 1 fcLok okdS xzke dLck /kkSyiqj vius vdsys ds uke jktLo] jsdkMZ esa bUnzkt djk fy;k gS tcfd izR;FkhZ la- 1 ls 4 ¼jktkjke] uoyflag] Hkxokuflag] eksguflag½ mDr fookfnr vkjkth dqUnu }kjk NksM+h xbZ ds 1@2 fuLQ Hkkx ds gdnkj gS ,oa izR;FkhZ ua- 9 yxk;r 12 ¼cSdq.Bh] bejrh] HkkxhjFkh] vtesjflag½ tks tloar ds okfjl gS] us mDr jdck izRkFkhZ la- 13 yxk;r 16 ¼dSykk] lqjsk] ljkst] ljorh½ dks cspku dj c;ukek djk fn;k gS] ftl dk mUgsa dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha FkkA vUr esa izkFkZuk dh fd oknh dk nkok fMØh djrs gq, mUgsa fookfnr vkjkth ds 1@2 Hkkx dk [kkrsnkj ?kksf"kr fd;k tkosaA 3- mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] /kkSyiqj us vius vknsk fnukad 9-4-2001 }kjk izR;FkhZ la- 1 ls 4 ¼jktkjke] uoyflag] Hkxokuflag] eksguflag½ dk okn fMØh djrs gq, mDr oknhx.k dks 1@2 Hkkx dk [kkrsnkj ?kksf"kr dj fn;k] ftlls vlarq"V gksdj izR;FkhZ la- 13 ls 16 ¼dSykk] lqjsk] ljkst] ljorh½ us ,d vihy jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] Hkjriqj ds U;k;ky; esa isk dh ftls mUgksaus vius fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 7-12-2001 }kjk vihy Lohdkj djrs gq, mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] /kkSyiqj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 9-4-2001 dks fujLr dj fn;kA mDr fu.kZ; ds fo:) izR;FkhZx.k us f}rh; vihy jktLo e.My] vtesj esa isk dh] ftlesa tloar ds okfjlku izR;FkhZx.k us bdckyh tokc ns fn;k ,oa fnukad 4-1-2005 dks izR;FkhZ ua- 1 ls 4 ¼jktkjke] uoyflag] Hkxokuflag] eksguflag½ }kjk vihy foMªks djus dk izkFkZuk i= isk fd;k] ftl ij jktLo e.My us vius vknsk fnukad 11-1-2005 }kjk vihy ugha pykus dh lwjr esa vihy foMªks djus ds vknsk iznku dj fn;s] ftl ij lHkh izr;FkhZx.k us lkt dj fookfnr vkjkth esa ls vihykFkhZ dks mlds gd fgLls ls oafpr j[krs gq, vkilh le>kSrs ds rgr fookfnr vkjkth tks fd izR;FkhZ la- 13 ls 16 ¼dSykk] lqjsk] ljkst] ljorh½ dks c; dj nh Fkh] mls ;Fkkor j[krs gq, ckdh cph vkjkth dks vkxs cspku dh dok;n kq: dj nh ,oa orZeku fookfnr vkjkth dks [kqnZ&cqnZ djus dh fQjkd esa gS] bu lHkh rF;ksa dk Kku vihykFkhZ dks rc gqvk tc vihykFkhZ vius fgLls dh Qly ysus izR;FkhZ la- 1 ls 4 ¼jktkjke] uoyflag] Hkxokuflag] eksguflag½ ds ikl igqaph] D;ksafd vihykFkhZ us izR;FkhZ la- 1 ls 4 ¼jktkjke] uoyflag] Hkxokuflag] eksguflag½ dks gh vius fgLls dh ns[kHkky djus ds fy, fu;qDr dj j[kk Fkk ysfdu tc vihykFkhZ dks bu lc dk;Zokfg;ksa dk irk pyk vkSj izR;FkhZx.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dks mlds fgLls nsus ls ;g dgrs gq, bUdkj dj fn;k fd mDr vkjkth esa vihykFkhZ dk dksbZ fgLlk o gd ugha gS ,oa uk gh mlds uke jktLo jsdkMZ esa bUnzkt gS ,oa mDr vkjkth dks rks mUgksaus csp Hkh fn;k gS bl rF; dh tkudkjh gksrs gh vihykFkhZ us fofHkUu U;k;ky;ksa esa gq, QSlyksa dh tkudkjh dh ,oa udysa izkIr dhA pwafd jktLo e.My ls vihy dks QSlyk xq.kkxq.k ij ugha gqvk vkSj fdlh Hkh U;k;ky; esa vihykFkhZ dks dgha Hkh i{kdkj ugha cuk;k gS] bl dkj.k jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh ds vknsk fnukad 7-12-2001 ds fo:) izuxr vihy isk dhA 4- vihy ds lkFk vihykFkhZ us /kkjk 96 lh-ih-lh- dk izkFkZuk i= ,oa ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;kA vihy ds yfEcr jgrs izR;FkhZ la- 13 o 14 ¼dSykk o lqjsk½ dh vksj ls muds vf/koDrk us odkyrukek izLrqr fd;kA 5- i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dks lquk x;kA 6- fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk dFku gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us bl ckr ij xkSj ugha fd;k fd vihykFkhZ ewy [kkrsnkj dqUnu dh iq=h gS] ftldk fooknxzLr vkjkth esa 1@3 fgLlk gS fdUrq izR;FkhZ la- 1 ls 4 ¼jktkjke] uoyflag] Hkxokuflag] eksguflag½ us vihykFkhZ dks okn esa i{kdkj cuk;s fcuk ,oa okLrfod rF;ksa dks fNikrs gq, vius i{k esa okn fMØh djok fy;k rFkk jktLo e.My esa oknh o izfroknhx.k us feydj vihy foMªks dj yh ,oa fooknxzLr Hkwfe dk cspku izR;FkhZ dSykk] lqjsk] ljkst] ljorh ds i{k esa djok fn;kA bl izdkj v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; izkd`frd U;k; ds fl)kUrksa ds foijhr gSA vihykFkhZ dqUnu dh fgUnw mRrjkf/kdkj vf/kfu;e] 1956 ds rgr izFke Js.kh dks okfjl gksus ls fooknxzLr vkjkth esa mldk tUe ls gh vf/kdkj Fkk ijUrq oknh o izfroknh us bu lHkh rF;ksa dks fNikrs gq, vihykFkhZ dks i{kdkj cuk, fcuk le>kSrk dj fy;k tks dkuwu ds fo:) gS vkSj fujLr ;ksX; gSA 7- izR;FkhZ la- 13] 14 ¼dSykk o lqjsk½ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vihykFkhZ dk fooknkxzLr vkjkth esa dksbZ fgLlk ugha gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ; dkuwu ds vuqlkj gSA i{kdkjksa ds e/; fookn dk jktLo e.My }kjk vihy@fMØh@ fVusalh@289@2001@/kkSyiqj esa vfUre :i ls fnukad 11-1-2005 dks fuLrkj.k gks pqdk gSa vihykFkhZ dks ;fn dksbZ fkdk;r gS rks og l{ke U;k;ky; esa pkjktksbZ dj ldrh gSA vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vihy iks"k.kh; u gksus ds dkj.k blh vk/kkj ij fujLr dh tkosaA 8- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ij euu fd;k] v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ;ksa dk v/;;u fd;kA 9- LVsV vkWQ iatkc cuke vej flag ,vkbZvkj 1974 ,llh 994 esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& ``Under such circumstances a person who is not a party may prefer an appeal with the leave of the Appellate Court if he would be prejudicially affected by the Judgment and if it would be binding on him as resjudicata under the Explanation 6 to section 11. 10- /kkjk 96 lh-ih-lh- ds vuqlkj ,d ,slk O;fDr tks okn esa i{kdkj ugha gS] og Hkh vihyh; U;k;ky; dh vuqefr ls vihy dj ldrk gS vxj mlds fgr ij ,sls fu.kZ; ls izfrdwy izHkko iM+rk gS vkSj ,slk fu.kZ; ml ij resjudicata ds :i esa ykxw gksxkA 11- izuxr izdj.k esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa oknhx.k dk dFku Fkk fd fooknkxzLr vkjkth oknhx.k ds iwoZ iq:"k dqUnu dh dkr esa FkhA dqUnu dk nsgkUr lEor~ 1997 esa gks x;kA dqUnu ds nks iq= uRFkh ,oa tloar Fks fdUrq dqUnu ds nsgkUr ds ckn laor~ 2005 esa vdsys tloar ds }kjk viuk uke jsdkMZ esa vafdr djok fy;k x;kA izR;FkhZ lqjsk o dSykk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us cgl ds oDr [kkrk [kljk ua- 117 dLck /kkSyiqj lEor~ 2006&09 dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi isk dh mlesa QkSr ds vk/kkj ij tloar ds uke [kkrk [kqyk bl izdkj ;g rks fufpr gS fd dqUnu dh e`R;q fnukad 17 twu] 1956 ls iwoZ gks xbZ] ftl jkst fgUnw mRrjkf/kdkj vf/kfu;e] 1956 izHkko esa vk;kA Jherh jkuhnsoh cuke ijekuan 1961 vkj,yMCY;w ist 240 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us iSjk 5 esa dgk gS%& ``In the above case, the widow became entitled to the property under the Hindu Womens Rights to Property Act,1937. That Act did not confer any rights on the daughter. 12- mijksDr fu.kZ; ds iSjk 9 o 10 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS%& `` The question is whether there is anything contained in the Hindu Succession Act which would divest the properties from these in whom it had already vested on the opening of the succession before the Hindu Succession Act came into force. In the case which his Lordship had before him if Achki Jha died before the coming into force of the Hindu Womens Rights to Property Act, 1937, the property would vest on his death in his other heirs. Those heirs could not be divested of this property on the coming into force of the Hindu Succession Act 1956 and that the property could not therefore vest in Achki Jhas widow. In the present case, on the death of Shri Ram in 1938, his property vested in his three sons. Their sons cannot be divested of any part of that property by virtue of the coming into force of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. In the present case, on the death of Shri Ram in 1938, his property vested in his three sons. Their sons cannot be divested of any part of that property by virtue of the coming into force of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The daughters consequently cannot get any share out of Shri Rams property after the coming into force of that Act. The applicant thus cannot claim any share in the properties of Shri Ram. She is not a proper party to the partition suit and her application was rightly rejected. ¼js[kkafdr cy nsus ds fy, fd;k x;k gSA½ 13- ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us bjEek cuke uh:iUUkk ,vkbZvkj 1966 ,llh 1879 esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd fgUnw mRrjkf/kdkj vf/kfu;e] 1956 dh /kkjk 8 Hkwry{kh ugha gS tks mRrjkf/kdkj vf/kfu;e ikfjr gksus ls igys fufgr gks pqdk gS og /kkjk 8 fgUnw mRrjkf/kdkj vf/kfu;e] 1956 }kjk fufuZfgr gksdj u, mRrjkf/kdkfj;ksa dks ugha feyrkA gekjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa mijksDr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa ds ifjizs{; esa vihykFkhZ dks vihy isk djus dk dksbZ U;k;kf/kdkj ugha gSA 14- ifj.kkeLo:i vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr lh-ih-lh- iks"k.kh; ugha gksus ds dkj.k fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA rnuqlkj ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 dk izkFkZuk i= ,oa vihy Hkh fujLr fd;s tkrs gSA 15- vknsk [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA