Jheky] lnL; & ;g f}rh; vihy vUrxZr /kkjk 225 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ ^^vf/kfu;e 1955^^ dgk tkosxk½ fo:} fu.kZ; Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] Hkjriqj fnukad 6-1-2006 ds izLrqr dh xbZA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd xzke xks<jk rglhy oSj esa fLFkr vkjkth jdck 34 ch?kk 12 fcLok ds lEcU/k esa oknh ch?kkjke us izfroknh fokEHkj n;ky o jktLFkku ljdkj ds fo:} ^vf/kfu;e 1955^ dh /kkjk 88] 89 o 53 ds rgr~ ,d jktLo okn mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] oSj ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;kA rkehy ds ipkr~ izfroknh fokEHkj n;ky ,d jkthukek izLrqr fd;k ,oa i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ fopkj.k U;k;ky; u muds fu.kZ; fnukad 2-4-2003 }kjk oknh dk okn fMdzh dj fn;kA mDr fu.kZ; o fMdzh ls O;fFkr gksdj izfroknh fokEHkj n;ky us vihy la- 63@2003 Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] Hkjriqj le{k izLrqr dhA vihy ds lkFk vihykFkhZ ifjlhek vf/kfu;e U;k;ky; us muds fu.kZ; fnukad 6-1-2006 }kjk vihy Lohdkj djrs gq, mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] oSj ds fu.kZ; o fMdzh fnukad 2-4-2003 dks fujLr dj fn;k rFkk i=koyh fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks bl funsZk ds lkFk izfrizsf"kr dh fd os fookfnr vkjkth [kljk ua- 452 o 588 ds iSr`d gksus o u gksus ds lEcU/k esa i{kdkjksa dh lk{; ysrs gq, jkT; ljdkj o lEcfU/kr cSad dks i{kdkj cukrs gq, jkthukes dh okLrfodrk ij xkSj djrs gq, iqu% viuk fu.kZ; xq.kkoxq.k ij ikfjr djsaA mDr fu.kZ; fnukad 6-1-2006 ls O;fFkr gksdj oknh@vihykFkhZ ch/kkjke us izuxr f}rh; vihy jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa izLrqr dh gSA ¼3½ i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dks vihy dh xzkgrk ds Lrj ij lquk x;kA ¼4½ vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk eq[; dFku gS fd v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; fof/k vuqlkj ugh gSA vihykFkhZ o izfroknh la- 1 us fnukad 28-3-2003 dks jkthukek izLrqr fd;k] ftls fopkj.k U;k;ky; us nkos dks fMdzh dj fn;kA jkthukek lgh gS ;k xyr] bldk fu.kZ; djus esa jktLo U;k;ky; l{ke ugh gSA bldks fuf.kZr djus ds fy, dsoy ,d ek= flfoy U;k;ky; dh l{ke gSA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us jkthukes dh oS/kkfudrk dk ifj{k.k dj vius vf/kdkj {ks= ls ijs tkdj fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gS] ftldk fd mUgs vf/kdkj ugh FkkA vius mijksDr dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkj-vkj-Mh- 1995 i`"B 392] vkj-vkj-Mh- 1997 i`"B 117] vkj-vkj-Mh- 1995 i`"B 409] vkj-vkj-Mh- 1993 i`"B 821] U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dk lgkjk fy;kA vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izR;FkhZx.k us foyEc dks {kek djus ds lEcU/k esa i;kZIr dkj.kksa dk mYys[k ugh fd;k Fkk] fQj Hkh vihyh; U;k;ky; us izR;FkhZx.k dh vihy dks le;kof/k esas ekudj fof/kd =qfV dh gSA ¼5½ izR;FkhZ la- 1 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; eas izR;FkhZ us vihy dks le; ij izLrqr u djus ds lEcU/k esa i;kZIr dkj.kksa dk lkiFk izkFkZuk i= fn;k Fkk] ftls Lohdkj dj v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us dksbZ fof/kd =qfV ugh dh gSA jkthukesa dks vihy ds ek/;e ls pqukSfr nh tk ldrh gSA vius mijksDr dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksus ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1993 ,l-lh- 1139 o 1996 Mh-,u-ts- i`"B 1 U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd;kA ¼6½ geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa }kjk izLrqr rdksZ ij euu fd;k rFkk vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vihy eheksa o mlds lkFk layXu v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ;ks rFkk izekf.kr izfrfyfi jkthukek fnukad 28-3-2003 dk voyksdu fd;kA ¼7½ v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us nsjh ds dkj.kksa dks i;kZIr dkj.k ekudj vihy dks le;kof/k ds vUnj ekuk gSA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us izR;FkhZ fokEHkj }kjk izLrqr vihy ds lkFk ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 d izkFkZuk i= dks Lohdkj dj vihy dks vUnj fe;kn ekuk gS] ftlesa fdlh izdkj ds gLr{ksi fd;s tkus dh vko;drk ugh gS D;ksafd v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk Lofoosd dk mi;ksx djrs gq, ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 ds vUrxZr foyEc {kE; fd;s tkus ds vkosnu dks Lohdkj fd;k gSA fu.kZ; fnukad 6-1-2006 dks i<us ls ;g dgh fof/kr ugh gksrk fd izuxr fu.kZ; iw.kZ :i ls vFkok U;kf;d fl}kUr ds foifjr ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us foyEc ds dkj.kksa ds vkSfpR; vkSj Li"Vhdj.k ij fopkj djus ds ckn foyEc {kE; djus ds i;kZIr dkj.k ekus gSA ,u- ckyd`".ku cuke ,e- d`".kkewfrZ] ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1998 ,l-lh- ist 3222 esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %& "It is axiomatic that condonation od delay is a matter of discretion of the Court. Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not say that such discretion can exercised only if the delay is within a certain limit. Length of delay is no matter, accptability of the explanation is the only criterion. Sometimes delay of the shortest range may be uncondonable due to want of acceptable exp;anation whereas in certain other cases delay of very long rance can be condoned as the explanation thereof is satisfactor. Once the Court accepts the explanation as sufficient it is the result of positive exercise of discretion and normally the superior Court should not disturb such finding, much less in revisional jurisdiction, unless the exercise of discertion was wholly untenable grounds or arbitrary or perverse. But it is different matter when the first Court refuses to condone the delay. In such cases, the superior Court would be free to consider the cause shown for the delay afresh and it is open to such superior Court to cometo its own finding even untrammeled by the conclusion of the lower Court." 10. The reason for such a different stance is thus: The Primary function of a Court is to adjudicate the dispute between the parties and to advance substantial justice. Time limit fixed for approaching the Court in different situation is not because on the expiry of such time a bad cause would transform into a good cause." blh izdkj dk er txnhk lokuh cuke gjcal flag ,-vkbZ-vkj- 2000 ,l-lh- ist 413 esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us vfHkfu/kkZfjr djrs gq, ;g dgk gS fd %& "The Hihg Court ought to have accepted the finding as to sufficiency of cause in explanining the delay to prefer the appeal and should not have interfered with the same that too in a proceeding under Section 115, CPC the scope of which is very limited, the power of the Court to interfere being only in cases of error of jurisdiction resulting in miscarriage of justice. We find no such infirmity in this case." foyEc ds fy, ekQh iznku djuk U;k;ky; ds foosdkf/kdkj dk ekeyk gSA ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 ;g ugh dgrh fd foosdkf/kdkj dks iz;ksx ek= lHkh fd;k tk,xk tcfd foyEc fufpr ifjlhek ds vUnj gksA foyEc dh le;kof/k dk dksbZ egRo ugh gS rFkk Li"Vhdj.k gh Lohdk;Zrk gh ek= ekin.M gksrh gSA mijksDr ds ifjizs{; esa gekjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us nsjh ds dkj.kksa dks i;kZIr ekudj tks vihy le;kof/k ds vUnj ekuh gS] mlesa ge gLr{ksi djuk mfpr ugh le>rs gSA ¼8½ xksiky cuke ckcwyky] 204¼2½ MCY;w,ylh ¼jktLFkku½ 662 = ¼RLW 2004(3) Raj. 1369½ esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS %& A suit challenging the compromise decree is completely barred under Order 23 Rule 3-A, read with explanation to Order 23 Rule 3, CPC the law however, provides two modes to challenge a compromise decree to a party to the compromise. The first remedy is under proviso to Rule 3 of Order 23 of teh Code of Civil Procedure. According to the proviso, a party can question the compromise before the Court which has recorded the same and has passed the decree in accordance therewith the second remedy lies in filing an appeal under section 96(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure against the compromise decree. Jherh x.ksk cuke ykMwjke] vkj-vkj-Mh- 1986 i`"B 666 esa jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %& "Raj. Tenancy Act, Secs. 223 & 208 - CPC, Sec. 96(3) & O.43, R. 1A(2) - Consent decree passed by A.C. n basis of compromise, held appealable before R.A.A. - 1978 RRD 11, referred - No restriction imposed by Sec.223 that appeal shall not lie from a consent decree - No provision, similar to Sec. 223 that appeal in R.t. Act - According to Sec. 208 provision of CPC inconsistent with R.T. Act, not applicable - No specific provision debarring appeals against consent decrees, exists in R.T. Act. - Even provisions of CPC imposing a bar on such decrees, amended in 1976 by incorporating O. 43 R. 1A(2) - R.A.A. erred in holding that no appeal lay against consent decree - case, remanded for deciding appeal on merits. - Even provisions of CPC imposing a bar on such decrees, amended in 1976 by incorporating O. 43 R. 1A(2) - R.A.A. erred in holding that no appeal lay against consent decree - case, remanded for deciding appeal on merits. (Para 6)" mijksDr fu.kZ; ds ifjizs{; esas gekjh jk; esa jkthukesa ds vk/kkj ij tks fMdzh ikfjr dh xbZ mlds fo:} izR;FkhZ la- 1 dh vihy v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; esa iks"k.kh; FkhA ¼9½ geus jkthukek fnukad 28-3-2003 dk voyksdu fd;k izuxr izdj.k foHkktu ls lEcfU/kr gS ftlesa fd Hkwfe/kkjh vko;d i{kdkj gSA jkthukesa ij Hkwfe/kkjh dh vksj ls dksbZ Lohd`fr vafdr ugh gSA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us vius fu.kZ; fnukad 6-1-2006 esa foks"k :i ls dgk gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; jkthukesa dh okLrfodrk ij xkSj djrs gq, iqu% viuk fu.kZ; xq.kkxq.k ij ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] ftlesa ge dksbZ fof/kd =qfV ugh ikrsA ¼10½ ifj.kkeLo:i vihykFkhZ dh vihy xzkg;rk ds Lrj ij fujLr dh tkrh gSA ¼11½ vknsk [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA