Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 2580 (RAJ)

Rameshwar v. Roopanarayan

2006-08-28

KAMAL NAYAN SHRIMAL

body2006
Jheky] lnL;-&;g vihy jkesoj iq= dY;k.k }kjk jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj }kjk ikfjr vknsk fnukad 17-4-2002 tks vihy la- 7@2000 esa ikfjr fd;k x;k] ds fo:) ;ksftr dh xbZ gSA izuxr vknsk }kjk fo}ku jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj us mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] lkaHkjysd }kjk ikfjr vkoaVu vknsk fnukad 28-5-1992 dks cgky j[kkA 2- fuxjkuh ls lEcfU/kr rF;kRed fooj.k bl izdkj gS fd izR;FkhZ la-1 :iukjk;.k dks fnukad 28-5-1992 dks mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] lkaHkjys }kjk vkoaVu desVh dh flQkfjk ij [kljk uEcj 517] 420] 520] 86] 84 dqy jdck 3 ch?kk 16 fcLok Hkwfe dk vkoaVu fd;k x;kA mä vkoaVu ls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZ us jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj ds le{k vihy izLrqr dhA vihy ds lkFk vihykFkhZ us ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;kA jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj us vihy dks dky-ckf/kr gksus ds vk/kkj ij gh vihy fnukad 17-4-2002 dks fujLr dj nhA mä vknsk ds fo:) vihykFkhZ us orZeku vihy ;ksftr dh gSA 3- eSus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k ds rdZ lqus ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 4- fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koäk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd fo}ku voj U;k;ky;ksa us vius vknsk ikfjr djus esa fof/kd =qfV dh gSA mUgksaus rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd fuxjkuhdrkZ dks lk{; ,oa lquokbZ dk volj ugha iznku fd;k x;k gS rFkk vihykFkhZ us ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 dk izkFkZuk i= e; kiFk i= izLrqr fd;k ,oa mlesa foyEc ?kfVr gksus ds Li"V dkj.k nkkZ;s x, Fks ij v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us ml ij leqfpr fopkj ugha fd;kA vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koäk dk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izR;FkhZ la-1 dks Hkwfe dk vkoaVu fu;eksa ds fo:) fd;k x;kA vkoaVu fcuk ehfVax dh vf/klwpuk tkjh fd, fd;k x;kA izr;FkhZ la-1 jkT; ljdkj dk deZpkjh gS] ftlus vkoaVu gsrq izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus ls iwoZ jkT; ljdkj ls vuqefr izkir ugha dhA fu;eksa ds fo:) fd, x, vkoaVu esa ifjlhek ykxw ugha gksrhA vkoaVu vknsk kwU; gS bl dkj.k fujLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA 5- izR;FkhZ la-1 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us fof/kd fcUnq ij Hkyh Hkkafr fopkj djus ds mijkar viuk vknsk ikfjr fd;k gS] ftlesa gLr{ksi fd, tkus dh dksbZ vko;drk ugha gS vkSj vihy dks fujlr fd, tkus dk vuqjks/k fd;kA 6- eSus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koäkvksa ds rdksZ ij Hkyh Hkkafr euu fd;k moa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- i=koyh ds voyksdu ls Li"V gS fd izuxr ekeys esa v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk vihy dky ckf/kr gksus ds dkj.k izkjfEHkd fcUnq ekurs gq, vihy dks fuf.kZr dj fn;kA vkoaVu fujLrhdj.k ds lEcU/k esa vihykFkhZ us tks rF; izLrqr fd,] mu ij dksbZ fopkj ugha fd;k x;kA izR;FkhZ la-1 dks Hkwfe jktLFkku Hkw jktLo ¼rkykc isVk Hkwfe dk —f"k iz;kstukFkZ vkoaVu½ fu;e 1961 ¼ftls rRipkr~ ^fu;e 1961* dgk tkosxk½] ds rgr vkoafVr dh xbZA ^fu;e 1961* ds fu;e 3 ds ijUrqd esa og O;fä Hkwfeghu dkrdkj ugha gS tks fd ljdkjh deZpkjh gSA fu;e 1961 ds fu;e 3 dk ijUrqd ¼,½ bl izdkj gS%& "Landless Agriculturist" ............... Provided that the folowing categories shall not be considered to be landless agriculturist, namely:— (a) an employee of the Government or of a commercial or industrial establishment or concern, his wife, and children dependent on him but this does not include a casual or work charge labourer; (b) ........... Provided that the folowing categories shall not be considered to be landless agriculturist, namely:— (a) an employee of the Government or of a commercial or industrial establishment or concern, his wife, and children dependent on him but this does not include a casual or work charge labourer; (b) ........... (c) ............" ^fu;e 1961* dk fu;e 4¼2½¼IV½ bl izdkj gS%& ^^4- vkosnu gsrq i= izLrqr djus dh vof/k rFkk mldh fo"k;-oLrq%& 1- vkoaVu gsrq vkosnu i= mn~?kks"k.kk tkjh gksus ds ,d lIrkg ds vUnj izLrqr fd, tk,axsA 2- vkosnd dks vfuok;Z :i ls Li"Vr% dFku djuk pkfg,A -------------- ¼1½ ----------------------------- ¼2½ ----------------------------- ¼3½ ----------------------------- ¼4½ fd og ljdkjh deZpkjh ugha gS rFkk -----------------------------** izR;FkhZ la-1 }kjk izLrqr ewy vkosnu i= ds voyksdu ls ;g Kkr gksrk gS fd O;olk; ds dkWye esa vkosnudrkZ us ^fpfdRlky; esa ifjpkjd* fy[k j[kk gSA jktLFkku Hkw-jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 dh /kkjk 101¼3½ fnukad 26-397 ls iwoZ bl izdkj Fkh%& ^^101 —"kd iz;kstuksa ds fy, Hkwfe dk vkoaVu%& ¼1½ ----------------------------- ¼2½ ----------------------------- ¼3½ jkT; ljdkj dh lsokjr fdlh O;fä dks fcuk jkT; ljdkj dh Loh—fr ds bl izdkj Hkwfe dk dksbZ vkoaVu ugha fd;k tk,xk ijUrq vjktif=r vf/kdkfj;ksa ds fy, ftyk/khk dh Loh—fr i;kZIr gksxhA** vfHkys[k ds voyksdu ls ;g Li"V gS fd izuxr izdj.k esa vkoaVu djus ls iwoZ ftyk dysDVj dh Loh—fr izkIr ugha dh xbZA izFken`"V;k izR;FkhZ la-1 dks vkoaVu fu;eksa ds fo:) fd;k x;k gS] bl dkj.k vihykFkhZ }kjk tks rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkoaVu vknsk fu;eksa ds fo:0 gksus ds dkj.k voS/k o kwU; gS] bl dkj.k ifjlhek ds izko/kku ykxw ugha gksaxs] esa lkj gSa] D;ksafd ^fu;e 1961* ds fu;e 3 ds vuqlkj Hkwfe Hkwfeghu —"kd dks gh vkoafVr dh tk ldrh gSA izR;FkhZ la-1 ml Js.kh ds vUrxZr ugha vkrkA jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us mijksä rF; dks /;ku esa u j[krs gq, izkjfEHkd fcUnq ij gh vihy dks fujLr djus esa fof/kd =qfV dh gS] ftls U;k; dh n`f"V ls mfpr ugha dgk tk ldrk] D;ksafd izR;FkhZ la-1 dk nkok voS/k nLrkost ds vk/kkj ij gS] ftlls mlds gd esa dksbZ fof/kd vf/kdkj mRiUu ugha gksrsA 8- mijksDr ds izdkk esa o izgykn Fkzw ,yvklZ cuek cksMZ vkWQ jsosU;w ,.M vnlZ 2006¼1½ MCY;w-,y-lh- 320] lksgu d¡oj cuek cksMZ vkWQ jsosU;w vkjvkjMh 2002 i`"B 1] jkskuyky cuke LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku ¼2004½ 13 ,l-lh-lh- 559 ds U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izuxr vihy Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA jkskuyky okys izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us dgk gS fd%& "A. Tenancy and Land Laws — Allotment of land — Allotment made to and ineligible person — Cancellation of — Legality — Long lapse of time — Effect of — Held, apart from other findings recorded by the Revenue Authorities, since it was concurrently found that R (father or appellants) was not resident of the same chak in which the land allotted was situated, it rendered R ineligible to get the allotment of land — No reason to disturb the concurrent findings — Cancellation of allotment, confirmed — Contention that after a lapse of about fifteen yars the possession of the appellants over the land should not be disturbed by cancelling the allotment, held, could not be sustained — Rajasthan Colonisation (Gang Canal Lands Permanent Allotment and Sale) Rules, 1956, Rule 3(1)(viii)(b)." mijksDr fof/kd ,oa rF;kRed fLFkfr ds ifjisz{; esa jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj dk vihy la-7@2000 esa ikfjr vknsk fnukad 17-4-2004 o mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] lkaHkjysd }kjk vkoaVu desVh dh flQkfjk ij [kljk ua-517] 420] 520] 86] 84 dqy jdck 3 ch?kk 16 fcLok dk vkoaVu fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA 9- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA