Judgment 1. The present revision application is by the wife, who was defendant in a Matrimonial suit for divorce. The Matrimonial Suit was decreed as against the defendant- petitioner. Against which First Appeal No. 652 of 1998 is pending before this court in owing parties have appeared. 2. While disposing of the Matrimonial Suit in terms of Section 25 of Hindu Marriage Act alimony and maintenance of minor children was provided for. Subsequently the defendant-petitioner filed I.A. No. 9448/ 99 in the said First Appeal, inter alia for enhancement of alimony in terms of Section 25 of Hindu Marriage Act. 3. The matter was contested and ultimately this Hon ble Court by order dated 1.10.1999 allowed the application and enhanced the alimony. Now, the defendant- petitioner wanted further enhancement in alimony. Instead of moving any application in the said First Appeal, as he had done earlier, he chose to move an application before the learned Matrimonial Court for enhancement of alimony as now fixed by this court in the said First Appeal. The impugned order is the rejection of defendant-petitioners said application by the matrimonial court. I am afraid no exception can be taken to the order impugned. Once the decree of divorce is passed and the appeal is pending before this Court, ancillary relief while passing decree also became subject matter before the appellate court. Any application for any modification of the decree or for ancillary order thereto can only be entertained by the appellate court i.e. this Court in the said First Appeal. This is what the defendant-petitioner had done on the earlier occasion. As such matrimonial court has rightly rejected the application noticing the aforesaid fact and I see no reason to interfere with the same. 4. The application is dismissed.