Jheky] lnL;-&;g f}rh; vihy vUrxZr /kkjk 224 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dgk tkosxk½ fo:) fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] vyoj fnukad 13-11-2000 ds izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd oknh dkywjke o lsBh iq=ku fdkuyky us tfj, eq- uguh L=h fdkuyky ,d jktLo okn izfroknh fdkuyky eq- ewyh] txnhk] izgykn] jktw] eqdsk] HkEHkksyk] dSykk] izfroknhx.k o rjrhch izfroknh eq- fdkuh] eq- /kuckbZ] eq- ghjk] eq- teuh] eq- Hkksyh ,oa jkT; ljdkj ds fo:) vf/kfu;e 1955 dh /kkjk 88] 89] 53 ,o1 188 ds vUrxZr mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] vyoj ds U;k;ky; esa vkjkth [kljk uEcj 350 jdck 2 ch?kk 6 fcLok] 360 jdck 1 ch?kk 18 fcLok] 362 jdck 1 ch?kk 18 fcLok] 436 jdck 1 ch?kk 14 fcLok] 437 jdck 2 ch?kk] 447 jdck 1 ch/kk 16fcLok] 448 jdck 1 ch?kk 5 fcLok] 827 jdck 1 ch?kk 6 fcLok] 451 jdck 1 ch/kk 5 fcLok 452 jdck 1 ch?kk 2 fcLok] 825 jdck 1 ch?kk 1 fcLok] 826 jdck 1 ch?kk 1 fcLok] dqy fdrk 11 jdck 18 ch?kk 12 fcLok okds xzke Hkwxksj rglhy vyoj ¼ftls rRipkr~ ^fookfnr vkjkth* ls lEcksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds lEcU/k esa izLrqr dj dgk fd fookfnr vkjkth jkepUnz ds dts dkr dh [kkrsnkjh dh gSA izfroknh fdkuyky] jkepUnz dk iq= gS ftlus igys uguh ls kknh dj yh rFkk ckn esa uguh ls ukjkt gksdj eq- deyh ls fookg dj fn;kA uguh ds xHkZ ls rFkk fdkuyky ds rqQ~rs ls oknh dkywjke o lsBh gq, ,oa fdkuyky ds rqQ~rs ls o deyh ds xHkZ ls 6 iq= txnhk] izgykn] jktw] eqdsk] vEcksyk ,oa dSykk gq,A oknhx.k dh ekrk uguh vius iq=ksa dks lkFk ysdj jkepUnz ds lkFk jgus yx xbZ ,oa mudk lkFk dkr djus esa nsrh Fkh blfy, jkepUnz us eq- uguh dh lsok ls izlUu gksdj oknhx.k ds gd esa tckuh olh;r ls fookfnr vkjkth dh [kkrsnkjh ns nh rFkk vk/ks fgLls dh izfroknhx.k dks [kkrsnkj jgus dh ckr dg nhA fookfnr vkjkth esa ls vk/ks Hkkx dh tckuh olh;r oknhx.k ds gd esa dj nh ,oa tkfgj fd;k fd mldh e`R;q ds ckn vk/ks Hkkx vkjkth ds oknhx.k o ks"k vk/ks Hkkx vkjkth ds izfroknh la-1 ls 8 fdkuyky] eq-ewyh] txnhk] izgykn] jktw] eqdsk] HkEHkksyk] dSykk [kkrsnkj dkrdkj jgsaxsA izfroknhx.k ds eu esa csbZekuh vk xbZA tks fookfnr vkjkth dk fojklru bardky vius uke djk dj oknxzLr vkjkth dks eqUrfdyh djuk pkgrs gS blfy, oknhx.k] izfroknhx.k ds lkFk jgdj kkfey esa dkr ugha djuk pkgrsA vr% oknhx.k dk okn fMØh fd;k tk,A fopkj.k U;k;ky; us izdj.k esa ntZ jftLVj dj izfroknhx.k dks lEeu ls rkehy fd;kA okn ds yfEcr jgrs fnukad 18-3-98 dks oknhx.k us ,d izkFkZuk i= isk dj fuosnu fd;k fd os rjrhch izfroknh 9 yxk;r 13 ds fo:) dksbZ vuqrks"k ugha pkgrs gS blfy, mudk uke rdZ fd;k tk,A izfroknhx.k us Hkh lgefr O;ä dhA bl dkj.k fopkj.k U;k;ky; us muds vknsk fnukad 9-6-1998 }kjk izfroknh la-9 yxk;r 13 ds uke rdZ dj fn;sA izfroknhx.k us ,d jkthukek isk dj jkthukesa ds vuqlkj okn dks fMØh djus dk fuosnu fd;kA i{kdkjksa ds vfHkopuksa ds vk/kkj ij o jkthukesa ds vuqlkj mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us oknhx.k dk okn bl izdkj ls fMØh dj fn;k fd %& ^^vkjkth [k-ua- 350 jdck 3 ch?kk 6 fcLok] 360 jdck 1 ch?kk 18 fcLok lkfye ,oa vk-[k- ua-362 jdck 1 ch?kk 18 fcLok esa ls 16 fcLok okds xzke Hkwxksj ds oknhx.k ,oa vk-[k-ua-362 jdck 1 ch- 18 fc- esa ls ks"k jdck 1 ch- 2 fc-] 436 jdck 1 ch- 14 fc-] 437 jdck 2 ch- 47 jdck 1 ch- 16 fc0] 448 jdck 1 ch- 5 fc- 827 jdck 1 ch- 6 fc-] 451 jdck 1 ch- 5 fc-] 452 jdck 1 ch- 2 fc-] 825 jdck 1 ch- 1 fc-] 826 jdck 1 ch- 1 fc- okds xzke Hkwxksj rglhy vyoj dk izfroknh la-1 fdkuyky o izfroknh la-2 eq- ewyh csok jkepUnz [kkrsnkj dkrdkj ?kksf"kr fd;k tkrk gSA** 3- mä fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh ls O;fFkr gksdj izfroknhx.k txnhk] izgykn] jktw] eqdsk] HkEHkksyk] dSykk] uohu us tfj, eq- deyh vihy izfroknh fdkuyky] eq- ewyh] oknh dkyw] lsBh ,oa izfroknh jkT; ljdkj dks i{kdkj cukrs gq, vihy jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] vyoj ds le{k izLrqr dhA vihy ds lkFk vihykFkhZx.k us ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;kA i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] vyoj us muds fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 13-11-2000 izfroknh@vihykFkhZ dh vihy fujLr dj nhA mä fu.kZ; o fMØh ls O;fFkr gksdj txnhk] izgykn] jktw] eqdsk] HkEHkksyk] dSykk] uohu us tfj, eq- deyh ;g f}rh; vihy jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa izLrqr dh gSA 4- geus mHk; ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dks lqukA 5- vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koäk dk rdZ gS fd izR;FkhZ@oknhx.k us ekSf[kd olh;r ds vk/kkj ij okn izLrqr fd;k ijUrq olh;r fyf[kr gksuh pkfg, tSlk fd vkjvkjMh 2006 i`"B 497 esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us le>kSrs ds vk/kkj ij [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj iznku dj fn,] ftldk fd dksbZ izko/kku ugha gSA izR;FkhZx.k us vihykFkhZx.k dks }kjk xkjft;u deyh okn esa i{kdkj cuk j[kk FkkA deyh ij lEeu dh dksbZ rkehy ugha gqbZA fdkuyky ij lEeu dh rkehy gqbZ ijUrq vihykFkhZx.k okn esa }kjk xkjft;u fdkuyky ds i{kdkj ugha FksA ijUrq fopkj.k U;k;ky; us fdkuyky ij rkehy dks vihykFkhZx.k ij rkehy ekudj fu.kZ; ikfjr dj fn;k] tks fof/k fo:) gSA fdkuyky] vihykFkhZx.k dk izk—frd firk gS rFkk og izR;FkhZx.k dk Hkh firk gSA le>kSrs ds vk/kkj ij okn fMØh dj fn;k tks fujLr ;ksX; gSaA deyh okn esa vyx i{kdkj ugha Fkh u ml ij lEeu rkehy gq,] bl dkj.k le>kSrs ds vk/kkj ij tks fMØh gqbZ mls pqukSrh nh tk ldrh gS rFkk vius mijksä dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus 2004 vkjchts 261 U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk lgkjk fy;kA izR;FkhZx.k us vius okn esa gh vihykFkhZx.k dks vo;Ld crk j[kk gSA vr% fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fy, vknsk 32 fu;e 2, 3 lhihlh ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr laj{kd fu;qä djuk vko;d Fkk bl dkj.k fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fMØh kwU; gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vknsk 32 fu;e 3 lhihlh ds izko/kkuksa dks vuns[kk fd;k bl dkj.k fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; blh vk/kkj ij fujLr ;ksX; gSA vius dFku dh iqf"V esa mUgksaus vkjvkjMh 1985 i`"B 112 U;kf;d n`"Vkar ij Hkjkslk fd;kA izuxr izdj.k esa jkT; ljdkj Hkh i{kdkj Fkh mldh lgefr ds fcuk fopkj.k U;k;ky; us okn fMØh dj fof/kd =qfV dhA okn foHkktu dk Fkk bl dkj.k izkjfEHkd fMØh ikfjr djuk vko;d FkkA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us i;kZIr dkj.k ekudj foyEc dks {kek fd;k gSA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vihy Lohdkj dh tk,A 6- izR;FkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koäk dh cgl gS fd v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; esa vihykFkhZx.k dh vihy] 173 fnu dh le;kof/k ds ckgj izLrqr dh xbZ FkhA foyEc dks {kek dj v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us =qfV dh gSA fdkuyky vihykFkhZx.k dk izk—frd laj{kd gSaA vihykFkhZx.k vo;Ld gSA bl dkj.k lEeu dh rkehy tks fdkuyky ij dh xbZ] og fof/kor~ gSA le>kSrs ds vk/kkj ij ikfjr fMØh ds fo:) vihy iks"k.kh; ugha gS] mls mlh U;k;ky; esa pqukSrh nh tk ldrh gS ftl U;k;ky; esa le>kSrs ds vk/kkj ij fMØh ikfjr dh xbZ gksA vius mijksä dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus ¼2006½ 5 ,l-lh-lh- 566 U;kf;d n`"Vkar dk lgkjk fy;kA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us vihy dks fujLr djus esa D;k =qfV dh] bl ckr dks vihykFkhZx.k us ugha crk;kA vr% vihykFkhZx.k dh vihy fujLr dh tk,A ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 53¼3½] 1992 ls jktLFkku vf/kfu;e la[;k 22 }kjk fnukad 11-11-1992 ls foyksfir dj nh xbZ gSA bl dkj.k fnukad 11-11-92 ds ckn Hkw-/kkjd ds lgefr dh vko;drk ugha jghA 7- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k ds rdksZ ij euu fd;k rFkk muds }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dk o v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; dh i=kofy;ksa dk voyksdu fd;kA 8- vihykFkhZx.k us v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; esa ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 ds izkFkZuk i= dk dksbZ tokc izLrqr ugha fd;kA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk Lofoosd dk mi;ksx djrs gq, ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 ds vUrxZr foyEc {kE; fd;s tkus ds vkosnu dks Lohdkj fd;k gSA fu.kZ; fnukad 13-11-2000 dks i<+us ls ;g dgha fofnr ugha gksrk fd izuxr fu.kZ; iw.kZ :i ls vFkok U;kf;d fl)kUr ds foijhr ifjlhek ds lEcU/k esa ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us foyEc ds dkj.kksa ds vkSfpR; vkSj Li"Vhdj.k ij fopkj djus ds ckn foyEc] {kE; djus ds i;kZIr dkj.k ekus gSa ,u- ckyk—".ku cuke ,e —".kkewfrZ ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1998 ,l-lh- ist 3222 esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "It is axiomatic that condonation of delay is a matter of discretion of the Court. Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not say that such discretion can be exercised only if the delay is within a certain limit. Length of delay is no matter, acceptability of the explanation is the only criterion. Sometimes delay of the shortest range may be un-condonable due to want of acceptable explanation whereas in certain other cases delay of very long range can be condoned as the explanation thereof is satisfactory. Once the Court accepts the explanation as sufficient it is the result of positive exercise of discretion and normally the superior Court should not disturb such finding, muchless in revisional jurisdiction, unless the exercise of discretion was wholly untenable grounds or arbitrary or perverse. But it is different matter when the first Court refuses to condone the delay. In such cses, the superior Court would be free to consider the cause shown for the delay afresh and it is open to such superior Court to come to its own finding even untrammeled by the conclusion of the lower Court." 10. The reason for such a different stance is thus : The Primary function of a court is to adjudicate the dispute between the parties and to advance substantial justice. The reason for such a different stance is thus : The Primary function of a court is to adjudicate the dispute between the parties and to advance substantial justice. Time limit fixed for approaching the Court in different situation is not because on the expiry of such time a bad cause would transform into a good cause." Hkkxey cuke ,e-ih- dkWijsfVo ekdsZfVax ,.M datwej QsMjsku fyfeVsM ,.M vnlZ ,-vkbZ-vkj- 2004 ,l-lh- 1230 esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "Himachal Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act (3 of 1969), S. 93 — Limitation Act (36 of 1963), Sec. 5 — Award mulcting appellant with financial liability — Appeal Challenging award — Delay — Condonation — Appellant during interval between date of passing award and date of his filing appeal taking steps challenging conviction and sentence imposed upon him and he succeeded in setting aside his conviction — Thereafter moved managing director for exonerating him from financial liability — All said events considered appellate authority for condoning delay — Delay condoned by appellate authority in its discretion, is well within its jurisdiction — Interference with, by High Court not proper." 9- /kkjk ¼3½ lh-ih-lh- bl izdkj gS%& ^^96- ewy fMØh dh vihy ¼1½ ----------------------- ¼2½ ----------------------- ¼3½ i{kdkjksa dh lgefr ls tks fMØh U;k;ky; us ikfjr dh gS] mldh dksbZ vihy ugha gksxhA ¼4½ -----------------------** ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 208 bl izdkj gS%& flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk dk ykxw gksuk&flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk] 1908 ¼1908 dk dsUnzh; vf/kfu;e 5½ ds mica/k bl vf/kfu;e ds v/khu ds lc oknksa vkSj dk;Zokfg;ksa ij flok;%& ¼d½ bl vf/kfu;e esa fdlh ckr ls vlaxr mica/kksa ds] ,slh vlaxfr dh lhek rd] ¼[k½ bl vf/kfu;e dh O;kfIr ds ckgj ds foks"k oknksa ;k dk;Zokfg;ksa ij gh ykxw mica/kksa ds] rFkk ¼x½ prqFkZ vuqlwph dh lwph ¼1½ esa vUrfoZ"V mica/kksa ds] prqFkZ vuqlwph dh lwph esa vUrfoZ"V mikUrj.kksa ds v/;/khu ykxw gksaxsA ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh prqFkZ lwph dh lwph 1 ds vUrxZr flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk] 1908 dh os /kkjk,a vkSj vknsk vkrs gS tks ^vf/kfu;e 1955* ds v/khu ds oknksa vkSj dk;ZokbZ;ksa ij ykxw ugha gksrsA ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh prqFkZ lwph dh lwph 2 esa flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk 1908 dh os /kkjk,a vksj vknsk mYysf[kr gS tks dqN dfFkr mikUrj.kksa ds v/;/khu ykxw gksrs gSa /kkjk 96¼3½ flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk dh prqFkZ lwph] lwph&1 ds vUrxZr vkrh gSA /kkjk 5¼1½ flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk U;k;ky;ksa ij flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk dh iz;ksT;rk ds ckjs esa izko/kku djrh gSA bl izdkj tgk¡ flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk esa jktLo U;k;ky; dks kkflr djus okys foks"k mica/k ugha gS ogk¡ ,sls fo"k;ksa esa os flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk ls kkflr gksrs gSA ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 223] 224] 225 ds vUrxZr vihyksa ds lEcU/k esa foks"k mica/k gSA vr% ^vf/kfu;e 1955* ds vUrxZr vihys flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk ls kkflr ugha gksxhA izR;FkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koäk us gekjs le{k iq"ik nsoh Hkxr cuke jkftUnz flag ,.M vnlZ ¼2006½ 5 lqizhe dksVZ dsflt+ 566 U;kf;d n`"VkUr izLrqr fd;k gS] ftldk geus Hkyh Hkkafr voyksdu fd;kA ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us mä fu.kZ; esa le>kSrs dh fMØh ds lEcU/k esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd & "17. The position that emerges from the amended provisions of Order 23 can be summed up thus: (i) No appeal is maintainable against a consent decree having regard to the specific bar contained in Section 96(3) CPC. (ii) No appeal is maintainable against theorder of the Court recording the compromise (or refusing to record a compromise) in view of the deletion of clause (m) of Rule 1 Order 43. (iii) No independent suit can be filed for setting aside a compromise decree on the ground that the compromise was not lawful in view of the bar contained in rule 3-A. (iv) A consent decree operates as an estoppel and is valid and binding unless it is set aside by the Court which passed the consent decree, by an order on an application under the proviso to Rule 3 Order 23. Therefore, the only remedy available to a party to a consent decree to avoid such consent decree, is to approach the Court which recorded the compromise and made a decree in terms of it, and establish that there was no compromise. In that event, the Court which recorded the compromise will itself consider and decide the question as to whether there was a valid compromise or not. This is so because a consent decree is nothing but contract between parties superimposed with the seal of approval of the Court. The validity of a consent decree depends wholly on the validity of the agreement or compromise on which it is made. The second defendant, who challenged the consent compromise decree was fully aware of this position as she filed an application for setting aside the consent decree on 21.8.2001 by alleging that there was no valid compromise in accordance with law. Significantly, none of the other defendants challenged the consent decree. For reasons best known to herself, the second defendant within a few days thereafter (that is on 27.8.2001) filed an appeal and chose not to pursue the application filed before the court which passed the consent decree. Such an appeal by the second defendant was not maintainable, having regard to the express bar contained in section 96(3) of the Code. For reasons best known to herself, the second defendant within a few days thereafter (that is on 27.8.2001) filed an appeal and chose not to pursue the application filed before the court which passed the consent decree. Such an appeal by the second defendant was not maintainable, having regard to the express bar contained in section 96(3) of the Code. /kkjk 96¼3½ flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk ds izko/kku ds tSls izko/kku ^vf/kfu;e 1955* esa ugha gS bl dkj.k gekjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa iq"ik nsoh Hkxr ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar esa tks fl)kUr ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us izfrikfnr fd;k gS] og izuxr izdj.k esa fof/k ds izko/kkuksa ls fHkUu gksus ds dkj.k ykxw ugha gksrkA jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB us fpEeu yky cuke bLyke [kk¡ 1978 vkj-vkj-Mh- i`"B 11 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "(a) Raj. Tenancy Act, Secs. 223, 222 & 208 — C.P.C., Sec. 96(3) — Applicability — Whether appeal against consent decree, maintainable before R.A.A. — No restriction in Sec. 23 that appeal shall not lie from a consent decree — No such provision like Sec. 96(3) finds place in R.T. Act — According to Sec. 222 no appeal can lie except as provided in Act — Right of appeal is substantive right and is creature of Statute — Hence nature and character of relief must be controlled by provisions of Statute — No prohibition, placed on filing of appeal against a consent decree according to Secs. 222 & 223, read together — Sec. 96(3) barring appeal from consent decree, held inconsistent with provisions of Sec. 223 and also 24 and as such Sec. 96(3) not applicable to appeals from decrees of Rev. Courts — Appeal against consent decree of S.D.O. held maintainable before R.A.A." ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us kkg ckcwyky [khth cuke t;kcsu ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1981 ,l-lh- 1973 esa /kkjk 5 flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk ds lEcU/k esa ;g dgk gS fd%& "5. Application of the Code to Revenue Courts. (1) Where any Revenue Courts are governed by the provisions of this Code in those matters of procedure upon which any special enactment applicable to them is silent, the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare that any portions of those provisions which are not expressly made applicable this Code shall not apply to those Courts, or shall only apply to them with such modifications as the State Government may prescribe. (2) "Revenue Courts" in sub-section (1) means a court having jurisdiction under any local law to entertain suits or other proceedings relating to the rent, revenue or profits of land used for agricultural purposes, but does not include a Civil Courts having original jurisdiction under this Code to try such suits or proceedings as being suits or proceedings of a civil nature." 21. The importance of this section is that wherever the provisions of the code of civil Procedure are sought to be excluded by any special enactment which may be silent on the point, the State government can be notification apply he provisions of the code to Revenue Courts. A bare perusal of this section would clearly reveal that excepting Revenue Courts all other Civil Courts would normally be governed by the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure in the matter of procedure, Section 4(1) of the Code of 1908 which is a saving provision clearly provides that in the absence of any specific provisions to the contrary the provisions of the Code does not limit or affect any special or local law. mijksDr foospuk ds ifjizs{; esa ge bl fufpr er ds gSa fd vihykFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr vihy iks"k.kh; gSA 10- ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 53¼3½ fnukad 11-11-92 ls iwoZ bl izdkj Fkh%& ^^¼3½ fdlh tksr ds foHkktu vkSj mlds yxku ds fooj.k ds fy, dksbZ djkj Hkw-/kkjd ij rc rd vko)dj ugha gksxk tc rd og fyf[kr ea mldh lgefr u ns nsA** mijksDr /kkjk 1992 ds jktLFkku vf/kfu;e la[;k 22 }kjk fnukad 11-11-92 ls foyksfir dj nh xbZ gS bl dkj.k ge izR;FkhZ ds bl dFku esa lkj ikrs gS fd le>kSrs ds fy, fnukad 11-11-92 ds ipkr~ Hkw-/kkjd dh lgefr dh vkodrk ugha gSA 11- fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa izR;FkhZx.k us vihykFkhZx.k dks tfj, xkftZ;u deyh i{kdkj cuk j[kk FkkA bl dkj.k gekjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa xkftZ;u deyh ij lEeu dh rkehy vko;d FkhA lEeu dh rkehy fdkuyky ij gqbZ] og vihykFkhZx.k dk izk—frd laj{kd vo; gS ijUrq og izR;FkhZx.k dk Hkh izk—frd laj{kd gSa izR;FkhZx.k us xkftZ;u eq- uguh dks cukdj okn izLrqr fd;k FkkA eq- uguh ,oa eq- deyh nksuksa fdkuyky eh.kk dh ifRu;ka gS] bl dkj.k fopkj.k U;k;ky; us lEeu dh rkehy fdkuyky ij iw.kZ gksuk ekudj okn dk fu.kZ; fd;k gS] ftls ge =qfViw.kZ ekurs gSA 12- vihykFkhZx.k vo;Ld Fks] vr% vknsk 23 fu;e 3 lh-ih-lh- ds vUrxZr fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk Hkh ;g drZO; Fkk fd og vihykFkhZx.k ds fy, laj{kd fu;qDr djrhA laj{kd dh fu;qfDr vfr vko;d Fkh vkSj mlds vHkko esa tks fMØh ikfjr dh xbZ gS] og kwU; gSA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us Hkh mldh iqf"V dj =qfV dh gSA 13- vknsk 23 fu;e 7 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr dksbZ Hkh oknfe= ;k oknkFkZ laj{kd vo;Ld dh vksj ls dksbZ le>kSrk U;k;ky; dh btktr ds fcuk ugha dj ldrk gSA izuxr izdj.k esa le>kSrk fnukad 9-3-98 o vfHkys[k ds voyksdu ls ;g ik;k tkrk gS fd fyf[kr esa le>kSrs ds lEcU/k esa U;k;ky; dh btktr dh dk;Zokgh vfHkys[k ij miyC/k ugha gSA bl dkj.k vknsk 32 fu;e 7¼2½ flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk ds izko/kku ds vuqlkj le>kSrk fnukad 9-3-98 i{kdkjksa ds e/; kwU;dj.kh; gSA 14- mijksDr foospuk ds ifjizs{; esa ;g f}rh; vihy Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] vyoj }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 13-11-2000 ¼vihy la- 5@99½ ,oa mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] vyoj }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 9-9-98 ¼jktLo okn la[;k 1@181@93½ vikLr fd, tkrs gSa rFkk izdj.k iqu% mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] vyoj dsk bl funsZk ds lkFk izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkrk gS fd og vo;Ld i{kdkjksa ds lEcU/k esa laj{kd fu;qDr dj fof/kiw.kZ rjhds ls okn dk iqu% u;s rjhds ls fuLrkj.k djsaA 15- i{kdkjksa dks funsZk fn, tkrs gS fd os mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] vyoj ds U;k;ky; esa fnukad 17-10-2006 dks mifLFkr gksaA ml jkst+ fopkj.k U;k;ky; vkxs dh dk;Zokgh lqfufpr djsaxsA 16- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA