Jheky] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr lgk;d dysDVj] laxfj;k ds vknsk fnukad 2-4-2004 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- la{ksi esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd oknh fydyflag us izfroknh jkesojh o vU; 8 ds fo:) ,d jktLo okn pd 10 ,u-Vh-MCY;w- rglhy lkaxfj;k ftyk guqekux<+ esa fLFkfr vkjkth ds lEcU/k esa U;k;ky; mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] lkaxfj;k esa izLrqr fd;kA lEeu rkehy ds ipkr~ izfroknh uEcj&2 guqeku ds fo:) fnukad 31-7-2001 dks ,di{kh; dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ xbZA fnukad 2-4-2004 dks guqeku us ,d izkFkZuk i= e; kiFk i= isk dj mlds fo:) ikfjr ,di{kh; vknsk dks vikLr dj tokcnkok izLrqr djus gsrq leqfpr volj fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA oknh us fnukad 2-4-2004 dks gh tokc izLrqr dj izkFkZuk i= dks fujLr djus dk fuosnu fd;kA i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ fopkj.k U;k;ky; us muds vknsk fnukad 2-4-2004 }kjk izfroknh guqeku dk izkFkZuk i= fujLr dj fn;kA mä vknskksa ls O;fFkr gksdj izkFkhZ guqeku us izuxr fuxjkuh jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa izLrqr dhA 3- mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dks lquk x;k o muds }kjk izLrqr rdksZ ij euu fd;k x;kA 4- fopkj.k U;k;ky; us ;g ekuk gS fd izkFkhZ us iwoZ esa U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr u gksus ds fy, i;kZI; gsrqd ugha crk;k blfy, izkFkhZ dk izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k x;k ftlesa eSa dksbZ vf/kdkfjrk lEcU/kh =qfV ugha ikrkA eaxyflag cuke lkxjey ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1957 jktLFkku 68 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd%& "When an application under O. 9 R. 7 has been dismissed it is open to the defendant to take a ground under S. 105 in the appeal which would finally come to the High Court from the decree passed in the suit, and therefore, a revision from an order dismissing an application under O. 9 R. 7 does not lie." mijksä U;kf;d n`"VkUr ds ifjizs{; esa ,sls vknsk ds fo:) fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; ugha gS ijUrq tgka rd izkFkhZ dh ;g vkkadk gS fd og izdj.k dh dk;Zokgh esa vkt Hkh Hkkx ugha ys ldrk] HkzkfUriw.kZ gSA vknsk 9 fu;e 6¼d½ ds vUrxZr tc ,d i{kh; lquokbZ dk vknsk ifkjr gks tkos rks mlds vkxs dh izfØ;k dh O;k[;k djrs gq, ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us vtqZu flag cuke eksfgUnj dqekj ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1964 ,l-lh- 993 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %& "On the terms of O. IX R. 7 if the defendant appears on such adjourned date and satisfies the Court by showing good cause for his non-appearance on the previous day or days he might have the earlier proceedings recalled—"set the clock back" and have the suit heard in his presence. On the other hand, he might fail in showing good cause. Even in such a case he is not penalised in the sense of being forbidden to take part in the further proceedings of the suit or whatever might still remain of the trial, only he cannot claim to be relegated to the position that the occupied at the commencement of the trial. Thus every contingency which is likely to happen in the trial vis-a-vis the non-appearance of the defendant at the hearing of a suit has been provided for and O.IX R. 7 and O. IX R. 13 between them exhaust the whole gamut of situations that might arise during the course of the trial. If, thus provision has been made for every contingency, it stands to reason that there is no scope for the invocation of the inherent powers of the Court to make an order necessary for the ends of justice." 5- mijksä foospuk ds ifjizs{; esa izkFkhZ dh fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; ugha gksus ds dkj.k fujLr dh tkrh gSA ;gka ;g Hkh Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ izdj.k esa vkxs dh dk;Zokgh esa Hkkx ys ldrk gSA 6- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA