Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 2792 (RAJ)

Jashoda v. Peerulal

2006-09-28

KAMAL NAYAN SHRIMAL

body2006
Jheky] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] vtesj ds vknsk fnukad 13-9-2000 ftlds }kjk mUgksaus izkFkhZx.k dh izkjfEHkd vkifÙk dks fujLr fd;k gS] ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds la{ksai esa rF; bl izdkj gSa fd okfnuh yhykorh o fkojkt us jktLo okn la-82@79 izfroknh iqD[kk] toajh o dkyw ds fo:0 vf/kfu;e 1955 dh /kkjk 183@188 ds vUrxZr mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] vtesj ds U;k;ky; esa xzke cklsayh esa fLFkr vkjkth [kljk ua- 458 jdck 3 ch?kk 8 fcLok ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;kA i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] vtesj us muds fu.kZ; fnukad 31-12-84 }kjk oknhx.k dk okn fMØh dj fn;kA mä fu.kZ; o fMØh ls O;fFkr gksdj izfroknh iqD[kk o vU; us vihy la-34@86 jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] vtesj ds le{k izLrqr dh] ftls mUgksaus muds fu.kZ; fnukad 23-2-87 }kjk fe;kn ds fcUnq ij [kkfjt dj nhA mä fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh ls O;fFkr gksdj izfroknh iqD[kk o vU; us vihy la-123@87@Vh,@fMØh@vtesj jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa izLrqr dh] ftls jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB us muds fu.kZ; fnukad 5-8-92 }kjk fujLr dj nhA mi[k.M vf/kdkjh }kjk izdj.k la- 82@79 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 31-12-84 ds fo:) ih:yky iq= isek us vihy la- 62@99 ¼41@98½ fnukad 8-6-1998 dks jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] vtesj ds le{k izLrqr dhA vihy ds lkFk ih:yky us /kkjk 96 lh-ih-lh- dk izkFkZuk i= ,oa ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 dk izkFkZuk i= e; kifk i= izLrqr fd;kA ih:yky }kjk yfEcr vihy esa oknh tkksnk csok fkojkt us ih:yky }kjk izLrqr /kkjk 96 lh-ih-lh- ds izkFkZuk i= dk tokc izLrqr dj ih:yky dk izkFkZuk i= fujLr djus dk fuosnu fd;kA i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us muds vknsk fnukad 13-9-2000 }kjk izkfFkZ;k tkksnk dh izkFkZuk fujLr dj nhA mä vknsk fnukad 13-9-2000 ls O;fFkr gksdj izkfFkZ;k tkksnk o vU; us izuxr fuxjkuh jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa izLrqr dhA 3- i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA 4- izkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koäk rdZ gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vknsk rF; o dkuwu ds fo:) gSa vizkFkhZ ih:yky ihfM+r i{kdkj ugha gS] bl dkj.k mls jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds le{k vihy izLrqr djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha Fkk o gSA okn la- 82@79 ds izfroknh ds izfroknhx.k us fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 31-12-84 dks jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds U;k;ky; esa pqukSrh nh] ftls mUgksaus fujlr dj fn;k] ftlds fo:) okn la- 82@79 ds izfroknhx.k us jktLo e.My esa f}rh; vihy isk dh tks Hkh jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB us [kkfjt dj nhA vizkFkhZ ih:yky ewy okn ¼82@79½ esa i{kdkj ugha Fkk] bl dkj.k mls vihy izLrqr djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha Fkk o gSA vizkFkhZ ih:yky us ewy okn ds yfEcr jgrs rFkk ewy okn esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMØh ds fo:) dh xbZ vihyksa esa i{kdkj cuus ds fy, dksbZ vkosnu izLrqr ugha fd;kA jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB us muds fu.kZ; fnukad 5-8-92 }kjk izfroknh iqD[kk o vU; }kjk izLrqr vihy dks vafre :i ls fnukad 5-8-92 }kjk fuf.kZr dj fn;k] bl izdkj jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 5-8-92 esa foy; gks x;k gSA bl dkj.k vizkFkhZ iqD[kk }kjk izLrqr vihy jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh ds ;gk¡ iks"k.kh; ugha gSA vizkFkhZ iqD[kk dks pkfg, Fkk fd ;k rks og fu.kZ; fnukad 5-8-92 ds fo:) utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djrk vFkok ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] tks/kiqj ds le{k pkjktksbZ djrkA vr% izkFkhZx.k dh fuxjkuh Lohdkj dh tkosa o jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh }kjk ikfjr vknsk fnukad 13-9-2000 dks fujLr fd;k tkosaA 5- fo}ku vf/koäk vizkFkhZ iqD[kk ds fo}ku vf/koäk dk dFku gS fd okn la- 82@79 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 31-12-84 ds fo:) izLrqr vihys jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ,oa jktLo e.My us fe;kn ds fcUnq ij gh [kkfjt dh nhA bl dkj.k foy;u dk fl)kar izuxr izdj.k ds rF;ksa dks ns[krs gq, ykxw ugha gksrkA vius mijksä dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkjvkjMh 1989 i`"B 196] vkjvkjMh 1990 i`"B 703] vkjvkjMh 1996 i`"B 373 U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk lgkjk fy;kA vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koäk dk ;g Hkh rdz gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 31-12-84 iVokjh dh fjiksVZ ds vk/kkj ij fd;k x;k gS rFkk iVokjh dh fjiksVZ esa vizkFkhZ ds firk dk Hkh dCtk fookfnr vkjkth esa crk;k x;k gSA ewy nkok 1000 oxZ xt ds vfrØe.k ds laca/k esa vizkFkhZ iqD[kk o taojh o dkyw ds fo:) fd;k x;k Fkk tcfd fopkj.k U;k;ky; us lEiw.kZ 3 ch?kk 8 fcLok ds laca/k esa fu.kZ; ns fn;k tks {ks=kf/kdkj foghu gS rFkk vizkFkhZ ds fgr izHkkfor gksrs gS] bl dkj.k mls vihy izLrqr dk lqus tkus dk vf/kdkj Fkk o gSa vr% vizkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh dks fujLr fd;k tkosA 6- eSus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dks lquk o muds }kjk izLrqr rdksZ ij euu fd;k rFkk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dh i=kofy;ksa dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- ;g fufoZokn gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk okn la- 82@79 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 31-12-84 ds fo:) ml okn ds izfroknhx.k }kjk izLrqr vihy jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ,oa jktLo e.My }kjk fujLr dh xbZA vizkFkhZ iqD[kk us jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds ;gk¡ fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 31-12-84 dks izLrqr dh vFkkZr~ ;g vihy jktLo e.My }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 5-8-92 ds ckn izLrqr dh xbZA 8- Sheodan Singh vs. Daryao Kunwar, AIR 1866 SC 1332, esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds le{k ;g izu vk;k fd fMØh ds fo:0 ;fn vihy fe;kn ds fcUnq ij [kkfjt dj nh xbZ rks og fu.kZ; vihy esa ekuk tk,xk vFkok ugha\ ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "We are, therefore, of opinion that where a decision is given on the merits by the Trial Court and the matter is taken in appeal and the appeal si dismissed on some preliminary ground like limitation or default in printing, it must be held that such dismissal when it confirms the decision of the Trial Court on the merits, itself amounts to the appeal being heard and finally decided on the merits whatever may be the ground for dismissal of the appeal." ;ke lqUnj kekZ cuke iUukyky tSloky ,.M vnlZ ¼2005½ 1 ,l-lh-lh- ist 436 esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %& "On going through the said decision in the light of the objects and reasons for the introduction of the explanation to Order IX Rule 13 and the concept of an appeal as indicated by the Privy Council and this Court in the decision already cited, the argument that an appeal which is dismissed for default of as barred by limitation because of the dismissal of the application for condoning the delay in filing the same, should be treated on a part with the nonfiling of an appeal or the withdrawal of an appeal, cannot be accepted. The argument that since there is no merger of the decree of the Trial Court in that of the appellate Court in a case of this nature and consequently the explanation should not be applied, cannot also be accepted in the context of what this Court has earlier stated and what we have noticed above." 9- mijksä U;kf;d n`"Vkar ls ;g Li"V gS fd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] vtesj }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 23-2-87 dh iqf"V jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB us vius fu.kZ; fnukad 5-8-92 }kjk dj nhA bl izdkj jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh dk fu.kZ;] jktLo e.My }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; esa foyhu gks x;kA jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds le{k vizkFkhZ ih:yky us mi[k.M vf/kdkjh }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; dks pqukSrh nh gS] tcfd mä fu.kZ; ds fo:) izLrqr vihy jkto vihy izkf/kdkjh o jktLo e.My }kjk igys gh fuf.kZr dh tk pqdh gSA ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ;ke lqUnj kekZ ds izdj.k esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr dh ifjizs{; esa eSa vizkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dh foospuk djuk mfpr ugha le>rkA 10- mijksä foospuk ds ifjizs{; esa esjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh dks vc mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] vtesj ds }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMØh esa gLr{ksi djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj {ks= ugha jgrkA 11- ifj.kkeLo:i izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk vizkFkhZ la-1 ih:yky }kjk jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] vtesj ds le{k izLrqr vihy la[;k 62@99 ¼41@98½ muokuh ih:yky cuke yhykorh o vU; dks vfHk[kf.Mr dj fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA 12- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA