Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2006 DIGILAW 2817 (RAJ)
Hari Singh v. Kishan Singh
2006-10-04
B.L.MEENA
body2006
eh.kk] lnL;-&;g f}rh; vihy vUrxZr /kkjk 224 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ dkrdkjh ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dgk tkosxk½ fo:) fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] mn;iqj 31-8-2000 ds izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- la{ksi esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd oknh gfjflag us izfroknh mn;flag] fdkuflag ,oa jkT; ljdkj tfj, rglhynkj] oYyHkuxj ds fo:) vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 53] 88] 188 ds vUrxZr jktLo okn la- 45@90 U;k;ky; mi ftyk dysDVj] oYyHkuxj esa fnukad 31-1-1990 dks tokc izLrqr fd;k rFkk lkFk esa izfroknh mn;flag o fdkuflag us fnukad 7-5-1990 dks tokc izLrqr fd;k rFkk lkFk esa izfrnkok Hkh izLrqr fd;kA fnukad 6-6-1990 dks oknh us tokcqytokc isk fd;kA okn ds yfEcr jgrs fnukad 4-8-1994 dks izfroknh mn;flag dk LoxZokl gks x;kA fnukad 27-3-1995 dks oknh us ,d izkFkZuk i= isk dj mn;flag ds okfjlku HkS:flag] vejflag] gfjflag] ehM+flag] Jherh pk¡ndaoj dks vfHkys[k ij ysus dk fuosnu fd;kA izfroknhx.k us fnukad 19-2-1996 dks mä izkFkZuk i= dk tokc isk dj dgk fd oknh dk izkFkZuk i= fe;kn ckgj gS] izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk kiFk i= ugha gS rFkk izkFkZuk i= fdl /kkjk ds vUrxZr izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] dk mYys[k ugha gksus ds dkj.k mls fujLr fd;k tkosA i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ fopkj.k U;k;ky; us muds vknsk fnukad 18-2-97 }kjk oknhx.k dk izkFkZuk i= fujLr dj fn;k vkSj vcsVesaV ds vk/kkj ij okn [kkfjt dj fn;kA mä vknsk fnukad 18-2-1997 ls O;fFkr gksdj oknh us Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] mn;iqj ds le{k vf/kfu;e] 1955 dh /kkjk 223 ds rgr vihy izLrqr dhA vihy ds yfEcr jgrs Jherh pk¡ndaoj dk LoxZokl gks x;k vkSj vknsk fnukad 9-7-1998 }kjk Jhefr pk¡ndaoj dk uke rdZ fd;k x;k] D;ksafd e`rd ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k vfHkys[k ij iwoZ ls gh ekStwn FksA i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us muds fu.kZ; fnukad 31-8-2000 }kjk oknh gjhflag dh vihy [kkfjt dj nhA mä fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh ls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZ gfjflag us izuxr f}rh; vihy ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 224 jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa fnukad 8-6-2001 dks izLrqr dhA vihy ds lkFk vihykFkhZ us ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 dk izkFkZuk i= Hkh izLrqr fd;kA vihy ds yfEcr jgrs izR;FkhZ Qrsgflag dh e`R;q fnukad 20-3-2002 dks gks xbZA e.My ds vknsk fnukad 6-11-2002 }kjk e`rd Qrsgflag ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dks vfHkys[k ij fy;k x;kA 3- i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dks lquk x;kA 4- fo}ku vf/koäk izR;FkhZx.k us izkjfEHkd vkifÙk mBkrs gq, dgk fd vihykFkhZx.k }kjk fu.kZ; fnukad 31-8-2000 ds fo:) f}rh; vihy izLrqr dh xbZ gS tcfd mä vknsk ds fo:) fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; gS] vr% vihykFkhZx.k dh vihy blh vk/kkj ij fujLr dh tkosaA vius mijksä dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1983 ,l-lh- 676 U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk lgkjk fy;kA izR;FkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koäk dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa vihykFkhZx.k us fnukad 27-3-1995 dks izkFkZuk i= isk dj mn;flag ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dks vfHkys[k ij ysus dk fuosnu fd;k Fkk ijUrq mä izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk vihykFkhZx.k us kiFk i= izLrqr ugha fd;k tks fd jktLo dksM esU;wvy ikVZ lSds.M ds fue; 33¼7½ ds vuqlkj vkKkRed gS] bl dkj.k vihykFkhZx.k dh vihy Hkh v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k iksk.kh; ugha FkhA izR;FkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koäk dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa vihykFkhZx.k us vknsk 22 fu;e 9 lh-ih-lh- dk dksbZ izkFkZuk i= isk ugha fd;k] bl dkj.k vihykFkhZx.k dh vihy iks"k.kh; ugha gS vkSj mls fujLr fd;k tkosA 5- fo}ku vf/koäk vihykFkhZx.k dk rdZ gS fd v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us izdj.k la- 91@97 esa fu.kZ; fnukad 31-8-2000 dks ikfjr fd;k mä fu.kZ; dh v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us fMØh cukbZ vkSj D;ksafd fMØh dh vihy gksrh gS] bl dkj.k muds }kjk izLrqr vihy iks"k.kh; gSa fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa izfroknh mn;flag dh e`R;q okn ds yfEcr jgrs gks xbZ Fkh ijUrq izfroknhx.k us mldh dksbZ lwpuk u rks U;k;ky; dks nh vkSj u gh vihykFkhZx.k dksA bl dkj.k muds }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= iks"k.kh; Fkk] ftlds lkFk foyEc gks {kek djus ds fy, izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus dh vko;drk ugha FkhA ;g izfroknh dk drZO; Fkk fd og e`rd mn;flag ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dks vfHkys[k ij ysus ds fy, tks izkFkZuk i= fnukad 27-3-1995 dks izLrqr fd;k] og iks"k.kh; Fkk] vius mijksä dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus 2005 vkj-ch-ts- 677 U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk lgkjk y;kA vihykFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koäk dk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd ;fn U;k;ky; bl fu"d"kZ ij igq¡ps fd fu.kZ; fnukad 31-8-2000 ds fo:) fuxjkuh gh iks"k.kh; gS rks vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vihy dks fuxjkuh esa rCnhy fd;k tkosaA 6- geus i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dks lquk o muds }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- ;g fufoZokn gs fd izR;FkhZx.k us mn;flag dh e`R;q dh dksbZ lwpuk vihykFkhZ gfjflag dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa ugha nh vkSj u gh bl vkk; dk dksbZ izkFkZuk i= izR;FkhZx.k }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;kA ucZnk kadj cuke ctjaxyky ,.M vnlZ 2005 vkj-ch-ts- 677 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS%& "In fact, the very purpose of inclusion of Rule 10-A in the CPC, is to obviate the difficulties which the parties have to encounter in case of death of a party to a pending and therefore, the provision incorporated in the Act has to be resroted to in letter and spirit.
It is for this very purpose that the informal information which is attributed to the counsel for the appellant will have to be ignored. It is an admitted position that the application for substitution was filed within a period of 90 days from the date of communication of death of the respondent and therefore, this appeal cannot be held to have abated." izuxr izdj.k esa izR;FkhZx.k us e`rd mn;flag dh e`R;q dh rkjh[k o mlds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dk vkosnu i= fnukad 27-3-1995] tks vihykFkhZ us fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds lEeq[k isk fd;k] mlds laca/k esa dksbZ fookn ugha fd;kA Hkaojyky ,.M vnlZ cuke ghjkyky ,.M vnlZ vkj-vkj-Mh 1996 i`"B 129 esa jktLo e.My ds le{k izuxr izdj.k ds leku gh izu mRiUu gqvk] mlesa [k.MihB us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& ^^nwljs bl vihy esa fo}ku jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds ;gka jsLiksaMsaVx.k Jh lwjtey czãkuUn ,oa xkscjhyky dh vksj ls vfHkHkk"kdx.k Hkh fu;qä jgs gS ,oa mUgksaus vUr rd oknhx.k jsLiksaMsaVx.k dk izfrfuf/kRo fo}ku jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds U;k;ky; esa fd;k gSA vUrxZr vknsk 22 fu;e 10, lh-ih-lh bu vfHkHkk"kdx.k dk ;g dÙkZO; Fkk fd os e`rd oknh jsLiksaMsaV Jh lwjtey dh e`R;q dh lwpuk U;k;ky; esa nsrs] ijUrq mUgksaus ,slk ugha fd;k gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa vUrxZr vknsk 22 fu;e 10, lh-ih-lh- ;gh ekuk tkosxk fd bl lEcU/k esa e`rd Jh lwjtey oknh jsLiksaMsaV ,oa muds vfHkHkk"kdx.k ds chp tks odkyr djus dk lafonk Fkk og fnukad 10-3-1989 rd dk;e jgk gS vkSj ,slh fLFkfr esa ;gh ekuk tkosxk fd e`rd Jh lwjtey dh vksj ls bu vfHkHkk"kdx.k }kjk izfrfuf/kRo dkuwulEer rjhds ls fo}ku jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds U;k;ky; esa gksrk jgk gS vkSj bl dkj.k Hkh bl vihy dks Jh lwjtey dh e`R;q ds dkj.k vcsV ekudj [kkfjt ugha fd;k tk ldrkA** ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us egsUnz lkM+h ,Eiksfj;e cuke th-oh- Jhfuoklu 111 ¼2004½ lh-,y-Vh- 316 ¼,l-lh-½ esa dgk gS fd%& "Abatement kills the right to sue and has the effect of unceremoniously terminating the pending legal proceedings without adjudication on merits. It has to be strictly construed and applied only to such cases to which its applicability is undoubtedly attracted.
It has to be strictly construed and applied only to such cases to which its applicability is undoubtedly attracted. Excepting where an otherwise legislative intention is expressly or by necessary implication deducible, a provision for abatement of pending proceedings shall abate only such proceedings as were pending on that day and at that stage and not the original proceedings which had already stood concluded that were reopened by a superior forum for the purpose of examining legality of propriety thereof." feBkbZyky nylaxkj flag ,.M vnlZ cuke vUukckbZ nsojke dhuh ,.M vnlZ IV ¼2003½ lh-,y-Vh- 89 ¼,l-lh-½ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %& "Once, the prayer made by the legal representatives of the deceased plaintiff for setting aside the abatement has regards the deceased plaintiff was allowed, and the legal representatives of the deceased plaibntiff came on record the constitution of the suit was rendered good; it revived and the abatement of the suit would be deemed to have been set aside in its entirely even though there was no specific prayer made and no specific order of the Court passed in that behalf." vr% mijksä U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa ds ifjizs{; esa ge izR;FkhZx.k dh bl nyhy ls lger ugha gS fd vihykFkhZ us fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa mn;flag ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dks vfHkys[k ij ysus ds izkFkZuk i= esa bl ckr dk mYys[k ugha fd;k gS fd okn dk mikeu gks x;k gS] ftls fujLr fd;k tk,A bl dkj.k vihykFkhZ gjhflag dks vihy v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa iks"k.kh; ugha FkhA 8- tgk¡ rd jsosU;w dksVZ~l eSU;wvy ikVZ f}rh; ds fu;e 33¼7½ dk izu gS] ;g fu;e vknskkRed iz—fr dk u gksdj funsZkkRed iz—fr dk gSA jkefp=k cuke Kkuh jke o vU; vkj-vkj-Mh- 1992 i`"B 165] Hkwiflag cuke dslkjke o vU; vkj-vkj-Mh- 1994 i`"B 545 esa kiFk i= dks isk djuk funsZkkRed iz—fr dk ekuk gS vkSj vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd kiFk i= ds vHkko esa izkFkZuk i= lk/kkj.kr;k fujLr ugha fd;k tk ldrkA 9- flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 104 o vknsk 43¼1½ ftu vknskksa ds fo:) vihy gks ldrh gS] muls lEcfU/kr gSA flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 2¼14½ ds vuqlkj vknsk ls rkRi;Z gS fd ^^vknsk ls flfoy U;k;ky; ds fdlh fofufp; dh iz:fid vfHkO;fä vfHkizsr gS] tks fMØh ugha gSA** vr% U;k;ky; dk fu.kz; tks vknsk ds vUrxZr vkrk gS] og fMØh ugha gks ldrkA 10- flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk ds vknsk 43¼1½¼V½ bl izdkj gS%& ^^vknskksa dh vihysa & /kkjk 104 ds micU/kksa ds v/khu fuEufyf[kr vknskksa dh vihy gksxh] vFkkZr~ %& ¼V½ okn ds mikeu ;k [kkfjth dks vikLr djus ls bUdkj djus ls bUdkj dk vknsk tks vknsk 22 ds fu;e 9 ds v/khu fn;k x;k gksA** flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 104¼2½ bl izdkj gS%& ^^bl /kkjk ds v/khu vihy esa ikfjr fdlh Hkh vknsk dh dksbZ Hkh vihy ugha gksxhA** mijksä izko/kkuksa ls ;g Li"V gS fd okn ds fujLrh ds fo:) vihy dj nh xbZ rks mlds fo:) f}rh; vihy dk dksbZ izko/kku ugha gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us ;fn xyrh ls fu.kZ; fnukad 31-8-2000 dh fMØh cuk nh rks bldk vFkZ ;g ugha fy;k tk ldrk fd fMØh ds fo:) vihy iks"k.kh; gSA vihy dk vf/kdkj ,d lkjHkwr vf/kdkj gS u fd izfØ;k laca/kh vf/kdkjA enuuk;d cuke galwckyk nsoh ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1983 ,l-lh- 676 esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS%& "Abatement of an appeal for want of substitution does not imply adjudication on merits and hence a specific provision had to be made in Order 22 Rule 9(1) that no fresh suit could be brought on the same cause of action.
Therefore when the appeal abates there is no decree, disposing of the appeal. An order under Order 22, Rule 9(2) refusing to set aside abatement is specifically appealable under Order 43, Rule 11(k). but such an adjudication if it can be so styled would not be a decree as defined in Section 2(2) and no second appal would lie against such an order." vr% fu.kZ; fnukad 31-8-2005 ds fo:) f}rh; vihy iks"k.kh; ugha gSA 11- mijksä ds ifjizs{; esa izR;FkhZ }kjk mBkbZ xbZ izkjfEHkd vkifÙk lQy gksrh gSA 12- izdj.k jktLo e.My esa fnukad 8-6-2001 ls yfEcr gS rFkk bl rduhdh vk/kkj ij fd fu.kZ; fnukad 31-8-2000 ds fo:) fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; gS u fd vihy bl dkj.k vihy dks fujLr fd;k tk, rFkk bls fuxjkuh esa rCnhy u fd;k tk,] izR;FkhZ ds bl rdZ ls ge lger ugha gS D;ksafd tgk¡ substantial justice o technical considration dk izu fufgr gksa ogk¡ substantial justice dks ofj;rk nsuh pkfg,A vr% U;k;fgr esa ge bl vihy dks fuxjkuh esa rCnhy djuk mfpr le>rs gSA 13- mijksä foospu ds ifjizs{; esa ;g f}rh; vihy fuxjkuh esa rCnhy fd;s tkus dk vknsk fn;k tkrk gSA lEcfU/kr dk;kZy; dks fyfid dkss funsZk fn;k tkrk gS fd og bl f}rh; vihy dks jftLVj esa ls gVk;k tkdj fuxjkuh esa ntZ jftLVj djsA vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koäk dks ;g funsZk fn;s tkrs gSa fd og lakksf/kr dkWt-VkbZVy 20 fnol esa isk djsaA i=koyh fdlh Hkh ,dyihB ds le{k fnukad 27-10-2006 dks isk gksA 14- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA[ 2006 DIGILAW 2817 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]