ORDER : 1. One Karunakaran Nadar had married a Christian lady Maria Augustine in 1955. He had two daughters and several sons. In 1975 he gifted particular property to the defendant No.1, his daughter. The validity of the gift was challenged by the appellants who are the sons of Karunakaran and Maria by filing a suit. The suit was dismissed by the trial court. The matter was carried in appeal by the appellants. The First Appellate Court remanded the suit for re-decision. Challenging the order of remand the matter was carried by the respondents before the High Court. The High Court upheld the decree of the trial court. The submission of the appellants that the father, namely, Karunakaran Nadar was incompetent to execute the deed in respect of the property in question because it was joint family property was negatived on two grounds. The first ground was that the marriage between Karunakaran Nadar and Maria Augustine was not valid and therefore the children born of that marriage did not form members of a joint family as per Hindu law. The second ground was that even on the basis that it was joint family property, it was held that the property gifted given at the time of marriage was within the permissible limits of the law and was a reasonable portion of the joint family property given for the marriage of the daughter. 2. As far as second ground is concerned, we see no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. However, as for as the first ground is concerned, the validity of the marriage of Karunakaran Nadar and his wife Maria Augustine was never in dispute between the parties. The issue not having been raised, the High Court entirely exceeded its jurisdiction in holding that the marriage was invalid. That part of the order of the High Court is accordingly set aside. However, the second reasoning of the High Court is upheld. The High Courts decision is affirmed on the second ground alone. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.