JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for accused petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State, perused the case diary and other material produced during the course of arguments. 2. It is contended on behalf of the accused petitioner Smt. Asha Devi that she has falsely been implicated in this matter being mother-in-law of the complainant, she is 60 years of age and suffering from various ailments and even, she is not able to move properly. It is also submitted that Vijay Singh who is husband of the complainant has been arrested, so called dowry articles have been recovered from him and he has been enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 4. Without making any observation on merits, having considered the rival submissions made at the bar, nature of accusation, material on record and all other facts and circumstances, I deem it proper to grant the benefit of pre- arrest bail to accused petitioner Smt. Asha Devi. 5. In the result, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petition Smt. Asha Devi W/o. Late Shri Vimleshwar Prasad Singh, she shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating officer in FIR No. 210/2006 registered at Police Station Kotwali Tonk, District Tonk provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- together with two sureties each in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- to his satisfaction on the following conditions : 1) that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required, 2) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer; and 3) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. Bail allowed *******