JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. According to the learned counsel for the appellant, the respondents themselves clearly admitted that they are not going to alienate the property in dispute. It is submitted that in a suit filed for specific performance of contract, if the property in dispute will be alienated, then this will create third party interest. Learned counsel for the appellant pointed out that the appellant never prayed against the recording to mutation in the name of vendor because the appellant is seeking title from the vendor, therefore, if his name is entered in the revenue record, he could not have any grievance. According to the learned counsel for the appellant, the Court below committed error of law by considering the facts in relation to the land dispute which was not the subject matter in this suit. However, according to the learned counsel for the appellant, the appellant's only prayer is that during the pendency of the suit, the property in question be not further alienated. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the respondents already gave in writing that they are not alienating the property and that fact has been recorded by the trial Court in its order specifically. In view of the above, it is prayed that the appeal deserves to be dismissed. 4. I considered the submissions of learned counsels for the parties and perused the facts. 5. Since the only prayer of the appellant is that during the pendency of the suit, the property in question may not be dealt with and alienated so as to create third party rightly and for this the respondents have already agreed in writing before the trial Court, therefore, this appeal is disposed of after recording the statement of the respondents through their counsel that the respondents are not alienating the property in dispute during the pendency of the suit. 6. At this stage, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the suit itself may be decided expeditiously in view of the number of litigations between the parties. 7. In the circumstances of the case, if will be proper to direct the Court below to decide the suit expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of the copy of this order which may be filed by the appellant before the Court below.Appeal disposed of. *******