ORDER 1. Special leave granted. 2. We have heard counsel for the parties. The appellant before us is the landlord who is aggrieved by the impugned order of the High Court dated 3-2-2005 whereby the High Court has disposed of the writ petition preferred by the respondents permitting the respondents to file a review application under Section 16(5) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). In the last sentence of the operative part of the impugned order a direction is given to the Rent Controller and Eviction Officer to consider the argument with regard to declaration of vacancy also along with application, if any, under Section 16(5) of the Act. 3. Counsel for the appellant submits that though an order made under Section 16 ordering a release may be reviewed under Section 16(5) of the Act only on the grounds enumerated therein, the said provision will not apply to an order declaring a vacancy which is passed under Section 12 of the Act and which in the instant case has attained finality. Counsel for the respondents submits that in the instant case he will be satisfied if the direction made by the High Court is confined to review of the order passed under Section 16 of the Act without considering the question as to the validity of the release (sic) order made under Section 12 of the Act. 4. In the circumstances, we dispose of this appeal by modifying the impugned order of the High Court to the extent that the Rent Controller and Eviction Officer will consider the review application, if any, filed under Section 16(5) of the Act only against the order passed under Section 16 of the Act and on the grounds enumerated in Section 16(5). This appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above. The counsel for the respondents states that they will be filing the review application within a month from today. Let that be done. 5. No order as to the costs.